Resection of peritoneal metastases causing malignant small bowel obstruction

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Resection of peritoneal metastases has been shown to improve survival in patients with abdominal metastatic disease from abdominal or extra abdominal malignancy. This study evaluates the benefit of peritoneal metastatic resection in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Merrie Arend EH, Abbas Saleh M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-10-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Online Access:http://www.wjso.com/content/5/1/122
id doaj-15e4f4c331494c5c8640abcaafa5cefa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-15e4f4c331494c5c8640abcaafa5cefa2020-11-24T21:25:48ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192007-10-015112210.1186/1477-7819-5-122Resection of peritoneal metastases causing malignant small bowel obstructionMerrie Arend EHAbbas Saleh M<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Resection of peritoneal metastases has been shown to improve survival in patients with abdominal metastatic disease from abdominal or extra abdominal malignancy. This study evaluates the benefit of peritoneal metastatic resection in patients with malignant small bowel obstruction and a past history of treated cancer.</p> <p>Patients and methods</p> <p>Patients undergoing laparotomy for resection of peritoneal metastases from recurrence of previous cancer between 1992–2003 were reviewed retrospectively. Data were collected about type of primary cancer, interval to recurrence, extent of the disease and completeness of resection, morbidity and mortality and long-term survival.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Between 1992 and 2003 there were 79 patients (median age 62, range 19–91) who had laparotomy for small bowel obstruction due to recurrent cancer. The primary cancer was colorectal (31), gynaecologic cancer (19), melanoma (16) and others (13). Overall, the rate of complications was 35% and mortality was 10%. Median survival was 5 months; patients with history of colorectal cancer had better survival than other cancer (median survival 7 months vs. 4 months; p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that the extent of recurrent disease was the only factor that affected overall survival.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Laparotomy for small bowel obstruction is a worthwhile option for patients with malignant small bowel obstruction. Although it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality it offers a reasonable survival benefit in particular for patients with completely resectable disease.</p> http://www.wjso.com/content/5/1/122
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Merrie Arend EH
Abbas Saleh M
spellingShingle Merrie Arend EH
Abbas Saleh M
Resection of peritoneal metastases causing malignant small bowel obstruction
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
author_facet Merrie Arend EH
Abbas Saleh M
author_sort Merrie Arend EH
title Resection of peritoneal metastases causing malignant small bowel obstruction
title_short Resection of peritoneal metastases causing malignant small bowel obstruction
title_full Resection of peritoneal metastases causing malignant small bowel obstruction
title_fullStr Resection of peritoneal metastases causing malignant small bowel obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Resection of peritoneal metastases causing malignant small bowel obstruction
title_sort resection of peritoneal metastases causing malignant small bowel obstruction
publisher BMC
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
issn 1477-7819
publishDate 2007-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Resection of peritoneal metastases has been shown to improve survival in patients with abdominal metastatic disease from abdominal or extra abdominal malignancy. This study evaluates the benefit of peritoneal metastatic resection in patients with malignant small bowel obstruction and a past history of treated cancer.</p> <p>Patients and methods</p> <p>Patients undergoing laparotomy for resection of peritoneal metastases from recurrence of previous cancer between 1992–2003 were reviewed retrospectively. Data were collected about type of primary cancer, interval to recurrence, extent of the disease and completeness of resection, morbidity and mortality and long-term survival.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Between 1992 and 2003 there were 79 patients (median age 62, range 19–91) who had laparotomy for small bowel obstruction due to recurrent cancer. The primary cancer was colorectal (31), gynaecologic cancer (19), melanoma (16) and others (13). Overall, the rate of complications was 35% and mortality was 10%. Median survival was 5 months; patients with history of colorectal cancer had better survival than other cancer (median survival 7 months vs. 4 months; p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that the extent of recurrent disease was the only factor that affected overall survival.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Laparotomy for small bowel obstruction is a worthwhile option for patients with malignant small bowel obstruction. Although it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality it offers a reasonable survival benefit in particular for patients with completely resectable disease.</p>
url http://www.wjso.com/content/5/1/122
work_keys_str_mv AT merriearendeh resectionofperitonealmetastasescausingmalignantsmallbowelobstruction
AT abbassalehm resectionofperitonealmetastasescausingmalignantsmallbowelobstruction
_version_ 1725982646515793920