Analytical Model for Predicting Productivity of Radial-Lateral Wells

An analytical model for predicting the productivity of Radial-lateral wells (RLW) drilled using radial jet drilling technology was developed in this work. The model assumes uniformly distributed equal-geometry laterals draining oil or gas under pseudo-steady state flow conditions within the lateral-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boyun Guo, Rashid Shaibu, Xu Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6386
id doaj-15d65db976ab450fbb50fed61b4fb92c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-15d65db976ab450fbb50fed61b4fb92c2020-12-04T00:01:53ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-12-01136386638610.3390/en13236386Analytical Model for Predicting Productivity of Radial-Lateral WellsBoyun Guo0Rashid Shaibu1Xu Yang2Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USADepartment of Petroleum Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USADepartment of Petroleum Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USAAn analytical model for predicting the productivity of Radial-lateral wells (RLW) drilled using radial jet drilling technology was developed in this work. The model assumes uniformly distributed equal-geometry laterals draining oil or gas under pseudo-steady state flow conditions within the lateral-reached drainage area. A numerical simulation and production data from three field cases of RLW were used to compare and validate the model. The result indicates that the model overestimates the well production rates for wells by 7.7%, 3.25%, and 8.8%, respectively. The error is attributed to several sources including, lack of data for well skin factor, uncertainty of horizontal permeability (<i>k<sub>H</sub></i>) in the well area, uncertainty of permeability anisotropy (<i>I<sub>ani</sub></i>), and uncertainty in bottom hole pressure (pw). Error analysis of uncertainties in <i>k<sub>H</sub></i>, <i>I<sub>ani</sub></i>, and pw showed that the model could predict productivity well with an acceptable error (10%) over practical ranges of these parameter values. Parameter sensitivity analyses showed that an increasing number of laterals, lateral length, and horizontal permeability would almost proportionally increase productivity. Well productivity is sensitive to well skin factor and oil viscosity, but not sensitive to the radius of the lateral.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6386radial lateral wellsradial jet drillingunconventional reservoirsanalytical modelingwell completion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Boyun Guo
Rashid Shaibu
Xu Yang
spellingShingle Boyun Guo
Rashid Shaibu
Xu Yang
Analytical Model for Predicting Productivity of Radial-Lateral Wells
Energies
radial lateral wells
radial jet drilling
unconventional reservoirs
analytical modeling
well completion
author_facet Boyun Guo
Rashid Shaibu
Xu Yang
author_sort Boyun Guo
title Analytical Model for Predicting Productivity of Radial-Lateral Wells
title_short Analytical Model for Predicting Productivity of Radial-Lateral Wells
title_full Analytical Model for Predicting Productivity of Radial-Lateral Wells
title_fullStr Analytical Model for Predicting Productivity of Radial-Lateral Wells
title_full_unstemmed Analytical Model for Predicting Productivity of Radial-Lateral Wells
title_sort analytical model for predicting productivity of radial-lateral wells
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2020-12-01
description An analytical model for predicting the productivity of Radial-lateral wells (RLW) drilled using radial jet drilling technology was developed in this work. The model assumes uniformly distributed equal-geometry laterals draining oil or gas under pseudo-steady state flow conditions within the lateral-reached drainage area. A numerical simulation and production data from three field cases of RLW were used to compare and validate the model. The result indicates that the model overestimates the well production rates for wells by 7.7%, 3.25%, and 8.8%, respectively. The error is attributed to several sources including, lack of data for well skin factor, uncertainty of horizontal permeability (<i>k<sub>H</sub></i>) in the well area, uncertainty of permeability anisotropy (<i>I<sub>ani</sub></i>), and uncertainty in bottom hole pressure (pw). Error analysis of uncertainties in <i>k<sub>H</sub></i>, <i>I<sub>ani</sub></i>, and pw showed that the model could predict productivity well with an acceptable error (10%) over practical ranges of these parameter values. Parameter sensitivity analyses showed that an increasing number of laterals, lateral length, and horizontal permeability would almost proportionally increase productivity. Well productivity is sensitive to well skin factor and oil viscosity, but not sensitive to the radius of the lateral.
topic radial lateral wells
radial jet drilling
unconventional reservoirs
analytical modeling
well completion
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6386
work_keys_str_mv AT boyunguo analyticalmodelforpredictingproductivityofradiallateralwells
AT rashidshaibu analyticalmodelforpredictingproductivityofradiallateralwells
AT xuyang analyticalmodelforpredictingproductivityofradiallateralwells
_version_ 1724400965504729088