The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems
Alternatives to conventional rigid fusion have been proposed for several conditions related to degenerative disc disease when nonoperative treatment has failed. Semirigid fixation, in the form of dynamic stabilization or PEEK rods, is expected to provide compression under loading as well as an inter...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Advances in Orthopedics |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/745610 |
id |
doaj-15b82a054bb54a64a310403a548c03f6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-15b82a054bb54a64a310403a548c03f62020-11-24T20:51:33ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Orthopedics2090-34642090-34722013-01-01201310.1155/2013/745610745610The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization SystemsD. K. Sengupta0Brandon Bucklen1Paul C. McAfee2Jeff Nichols3Raghavendra Angara4Saif Khalil5Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USAGlobus Medical, Inc., Valley Forge Business Center, 2560 General Armistead Avenue, Audubon, PA 19403, USATowson Orthopaedic Associates, P.A.—Scoliosis and Spine Center, O'Dea Medical Arts Building, Suite 104, 7505 Osler Drive, Towson, MD 21204, USAGlobus Medical, Inc., Valley Forge Business Center, 2560 General Armistead Avenue, Audubon, PA 19403, USAGlobus Medical, Inc., Valley Forge Business Center, 2560 General Armistead Avenue, Audubon, PA 19403, USAGlobus Medical, Inc., Valley Forge Business Center, 2560 General Armistead Avenue, Audubon, PA 19403, USAAlternatives to conventional rigid fusion have been proposed for several conditions related to degenerative disc disease when nonoperative treatment has failed. Semirigid fixation, in the form of dynamic stabilization or PEEK rods, is expected to provide compression under loading as well as an intermediate level of stabilization. This study systematically examines both the load-sharing characteristics and kinematics of these two devices compared to the standard of internal rigid fixators. Load-sharing was studied by using digital pressure films inserted between an artificially machined disc and two loading fixtures. Rigid rods, PEEK rods, and the dynamic stabilization system were inserted posteriorly for stabilization. The kinematics were quantified on ten, human, cadaver lumbosacral spines (L3-S1) which were tested under a pure bending moment, in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The magnitude of load transmission through the anterior column was significantly greater with the dynamic device compared to PEEK rods and rigid rods. The contact pressures were distributed more uniformly, throughout the disc with the dynamic stabilization devices, and had smaller maximum point-loading (pressures) on any particular point within the disc. Kinematically, the motion was reduced by both semirigid devices similarly in all directions, with slight rigidity imparted by a lateral interbody device.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/745610 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
D. K. Sengupta Brandon Bucklen Paul C. McAfee Jeff Nichols Raghavendra Angara Saif Khalil |
spellingShingle |
D. K. Sengupta Brandon Bucklen Paul C. McAfee Jeff Nichols Raghavendra Angara Saif Khalil The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems Advances in Orthopedics |
author_facet |
D. K. Sengupta Brandon Bucklen Paul C. McAfee Jeff Nichols Raghavendra Angara Saif Khalil |
author_sort |
D. K. Sengupta |
title |
The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems |
title_short |
The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems |
title_full |
The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems |
title_fullStr |
The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems |
title_sort |
comprehensive biomechanics and load-sharing of semirigid peek and semirigid posterior dynamic stabilization systems |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Advances in Orthopedics |
issn |
2090-3464 2090-3472 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Alternatives to conventional rigid fusion have been proposed for several conditions related to degenerative disc disease when nonoperative treatment has failed. Semirigid fixation, in the form of dynamic stabilization or PEEK rods, is expected to provide compression under loading as well as an intermediate level of stabilization. This study systematically examines both the load-sharing characteristics and kinematics of these two devices compared to the standard of internal rigid fixators. Load-sharing was studied by using digital pressure films inserted between an artificially machined disc and two loading fixtures. Rigid rods, PEEK rods, and the dynamic stabilization system were inserted posteriorly for stabilization. The kinematics were quantified on ten, human, cadaver lumbosacral spines (L3-S1) which were tested under a pure bending moment, in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The magnitude of load transmission through the anterior column was significantly greater with the dynamic device compared to PEEK rods and rigid rods. The contact pressures were distributed more uniformly, throughout the disc with the dynamic stabilization devices, and had smaller maximum point-loading (pressures) on any particular point within the disc. Kinematically, the motion was reduced by both semirigid devices similarly in all directions, with slight rigidity imparted by a lateral interbody device. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/745610 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dksengupta thecomprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems AT brandonbucklen thecomprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems AT paulcmcafee thecomprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems AT jeffnichols thecomprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems AT raghavendraangara thecomprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems AT saifkhalil thecomprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems AT dksengupta comprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems AT brandonbucklen comprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems AT paulcmcafee comprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems AT jeffnichols comprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems AT raghavendraangara comprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems AT saifkhalil comprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems |
_version_ |
1716801842226135040 |