The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems

Alternatives to conventional rigid fusion have been proposed for several conditions related to degenerative disc disease when nonoperative treatment has failed. Semirigid fixation, in the form of dynamic stabilization or PEEK rods, is expected to provide compression under loading as well as an inter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. K. Sengupta, Brandon Bucklen, Paul C. McAfee, Jeff Nichols, Raghavendra Angara, Saif Khalil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Advances in Orthopedics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/745610
id doaj-15b82a054bb54a64a310403a548c03f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-15b82a054bb54a64a310403a548c03f62020-11-24T20:51:33ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Orthopedics2090-34642090-34722013-01-01201310.1155/2013/745610745610The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization SystemsD. K. Sengupta0Brandon Bucklen1Paul C. McAfee2Jeff Nichols3Raghavendra Angara4Saif Khalil5Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USAGlobus Medical, Inc., Valley Forge Business Center, 2560 General Armistead Avenue, Audubon, PA 19403, USATowson Orthopaedic Associates, P.A.—Scoliosis and Spine Center, O'Dea Medical Arts Building, Suite 104, 7505 Osler Drive, Towson, MD 21204, USAGlobus Medical, Inc., Valley Forge Business Center, 2560 General Armistead Avenue, Audubon, PA 19403, USAGlobus Medical, Inc., Valley Forge Business Center, 2560 General Armistead Avenue, Audubon, PA 19403, USAGlobus Medical, Inc., Valley Forge Business Center, 2560 General Armistead Avenue, Audubon, PA 19403, USAAlternatives to conventional rigid fusion have been proposed for several conditions related to degenerative disc disease when nonoperative treatment has failed. Semirigid fixation, in the form of dynamic stabilization or PEEK rods, is expected to provide compression under loading as well as an intermediate level of stabilization. This study systematically examines both the load-sharing characteristics and kinematics of these two devices compared to the standard of internal rigid fixators. Load-sharing was studied by using digital pressure films inserted between an artificially machined disc and two loading fixtures. Rigid rods, PEEK rods, and the dynamic stabilization system were inserted posteriorly for stabilization. The kinematics were quantified on ten, human, cadaver lumbosacral spines (L3-S1) which were tested under a pure bending moment, in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The magnitude of load transmission through the anterior column was significantly greater with the dynamic device compared to PEEK rods and rigid rods. The contact pressures were distributed more uniformly, throughout the disc with the dynamic stabilization devices, and had smaller maximum point-loading (pressures) on any particular point within the disc. Kinematically, the motion was reduced by both semirigid devices similarly in all directions, with slight rigidity imparted by a lateral interbody device.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/745610
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. K. Sengupta
Brandon Bucklen
Paul C. McAfee
Jeff Nichols
Raghavendra Angara
Saif Khalil
spellingShingle D. K. Sengupta
Brandon Bucklen
Paul C. McAfee
Jeff Nichols
Raghavendra Angara
Saif Khalil
The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems
Advances in Orthopedics
author_facet D. K. Sengupta
Brandon Bucklen
Paul C. McAfee
Jeff Nichols
Raghavendra Angara
Saif Khalil
author_sort D. K. Sengupta
title The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems
title_short The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems
title_full The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems
title_fullStr The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems
title_full_unstemmed The Comprehensive Biomechanics and Load-Sharing of Semirigid PEEK and Semirigid Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems
title_sort comprehensive biomechanics and load-sharing of semirigid peek and semirigid posterior dynamic stabilization systems
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Orthopedics
issn 2090-3464
2090-3472
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Alternatives to conventional rigid fusion have been proposed for several conditions related to degenerative disc disease when nonoperative treatment has failed. Semirigid fixation, in the form of dynamic stabilization or PEEK rods, is expected to provide compression under loading as well as an intermediate level of stabilization. This study systematically examines both the load-sharing characteristics and kinematics of these two devices compared to the standard of internal rigid fixators. Load-sharing was studied by using digital pressure films inserted between an artificially machined disc and two loading fixtures. Rigid rods, PEEK rods, and the dynamic stabilization system were inserted posteriorly for stabilization. The kinematics were quantified on ten, human, cadaver lumbosacral spines (L3-S1) which were tested under a pure bending moment, in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The magnitude of load transmission through the anterior column was significantly greater with the dynamic device compared to PEEK rods and rigid rods. The contact pressures were distributed more uniformly, throughout the disc with the dynamic stabilization devices, and had smaller maximum point-loading (pressures) on any particular point within the disc. Kinematically, the motion was reduced by both semirigid devices similarly in all directions, with slight rigidity imparted by a lateral interbody device.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/745610
work_keys_str_mv AT dksengupta thecomprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems
AT brandonbucklen thecomprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems
AT paulcmcafee thecomprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems
AT jeffnichols thecomprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems
AT raghavendraangara thecomprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems
AT saifkhalil thecomprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems
AT dksengupta comprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems
AT brandonbucklen comprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems
AT paulcmcafee comprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems
AT jeffnichols comprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems
AT raghavendraangara comprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems
AT saifkhalil comprehensivebiomechanicsandloadsharingofsemirigidpeekandsemirigidposteriordynamicstabilizationsystems
_version_ 1716801842226135040