Is a mean machine better than a dependable drive? It’s geared towards your regulatory focus

While many studies have investigated the role of message-level valence in persuasive messages (i.e., how positive or negative message content affects attitudes), none of these have examined whether word-level valence can modulate such effects. We investigated whether emotional language used within...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Graham G. Scott, Sara C. Sereno, Patrick J. O'Donnell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00268/full
id doaj-159bd656eef04bbdbd292e9aae67a6f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-159bd656eef04bbdbd292e9aae67a6f62020-11-25T01:15:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782012-08-01310.3389/fpsyg.2012.0026814744Is a mean machine better than a dependable drive? It’s geared towards your regulatory focusGraham G. Scott0Sara C. Sereno1Sara C. Sereno2Patrick J. O'Donnell3University of AberdeenUniversity of GlasgowUniversity of GlasgowUniversity of GlasgowWhile many studies have investigated the role of message-level valence in persuasive messages (i.e., how positive or negative message content affects attitudes), none of these have examined whether word-level valence can modulate such effects. We investigated whether emotional language used within persuasive messages influenced attitudes and whether the processing of such communications could be modulated by regulatory focus. Using a 2 (Message: Positive, Negative) × 2 (Words: Positive, Negative) design, participants read car reviews and rated each on a series of semantic differentials and product recommendations. While positive messages were always rated higher than negative ones, the valence of a message’s component words differentially impacted attitudes toward distinct aspects of the product. On promotion-focus features, messages containing negative words produced higher ratings; for prevention-focus aspects, those with positive words resulted in higher ratings. We argue that adopting a prevention- or promotion-focused stance can influence the interpretation of emotion words in relation to overall message comprehension.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00268/fullemotionattitude changemessagesregulatory focuswords
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Graham G. Scott
Sara C. Sereno
Sara C. Sereno
Patrick J. O'Donnell
spellingShingle Graham G. Scott
Sara C. Sereno
Sara C. Sereno
Patrick J. O'Donnell
Is a mean machine better than a dependable drive? It’s geared towards your regulatory focus
Frontiers in Psychology
emotion
attitude change
messages
regulatory focus
words
author_facet Graham G. Scott
Sara C. Sereno
Sara C. Sereno
Patrick J. O'Donnell
author_sort Graham G. Scott
title Is a mean machine better than a dependable drive? It’s geared towards your regulatory focus
title_short Is a mean machine better than a dependable drive? It’s geared towards your regulatory focus
title_full Is a mean machine better than a dependable drive? It’s geared towards your regulatory focus
title_fullStr Is a mean machine better than a dependable drive? It’s geared towards your regulatory focus
title_full_unstemmed Is a mean machine better than a dependable drive? It’s geared towards your regulatory focus
title_sort is a mean machine better than a dependable drive? it’s geared towards your regulatory focus
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2012-08-01
description While many studies have investigated the role of message-level valence in persuasive messages (i.e., how positive or negative message content affects attitudes), none of these have examined whether word-level valence can modulate such effects. We investigated whether emotional language used within persuasive messages influenced attitudes and whether the processing of such communications could be modulated by regulatory focus. Using a 2 (Message: Positive, Negative) × 2 (Words: Positive, Negative) design, participants read car reviews and rated each on a series of semantic differentials and product recommendations. While positive messages were always rated higher than negative ones, the valence of a message’s component words differentially impacted attitudes toward distinct aspects of the product. On promotion-focus features, messages containing negative words produced higher ratings; for prevention-focus aspects, those with positive words resulted in higher ratings. We argue that adopting a prevention- or promotion-focused stance can influence the interpretation of emotion words in relation to overall message comprehension.
topic emotion
attitude change
messages
regulatory focus
words
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00268/full
work_keys_str_mv AT grahamgscott isameanmachinebetterthanadependabledriveitsgearedtowardsyourregulatoryfocus
AT saracsereno isameanmachinebetterthanadependabledriveitsgearedtowardsyourregulatoryfocus
AT saracsereno isameanmachinebetterthanadependabledriveitsgearedtowardsyourregulatoryfocus
AT patrickjodonnell isameanmachinebetterthanadependabledriveitsgearedtowardsyourregulatoryfocus
_version_ 1725154171774042112