Mandibular Range of Movement and Pain Intensity in Patients with Anterior Disc Displacement without Reduction

Objective: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are the most common source of orofacial pain of a non-dental origin. The study was performed to investigate the therapeutic effect of the conventional occlusal splint therapy and the physical therapy. The hypothesis tested was that the simultaneous use...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marijana Gikić, Melita Valentić-Peruzović, Iva Z. Alajbeg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb. School of Dental Medicine 2015-01-01
Series:Acta Stomatologica Croatica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/206540
id doaj-158935ee92214c95a0a98c021a5f0ba5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-158935ee92214c95a0a98c021a5f0ba52020-11-24T23:57:13ZengUniversity of Zagreb. School of Dental MedicineActa Stomatologica Croatica0001-70191846-04102015-01-01492119127Mandibular Range of Movement and Pain Intensity in Patients with Anterior Disc Displacement without ReductionMarijana Gikić0Melita Valentić-Peruzović1Iva Z. Alajbeg2Private dental clinic, Zagreb, CroatiaCroatian Academy of Medical Sciences, Croatian Academy of Medical SciencesDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine University of Zagreb, zagreb, CroatiaObjective: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are the most common source of orofacial pain of a non-dental origin. The study was performed to investigate the therapeutic effect of the conventional occlusal splint therapy and the physical therapy. The hypothesis tested was that the simultaneous use of occlusal splint and physical therapy is an effective method for treatment of anterior disc displacement without reduction. Materials and Methods: Twelve patients (mean age =30.5 y) with anterior disc displacement without reduction (according to RDC/TMD and confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging) were randomly allocated into 2 groups: 6 received stabilization splint (SS) and 6 received both physical therapy and stabilization splint (SS&PT). Treatment outcomes included pain-free opening (MCO), maximum assisted opening (MAO), path of mouth opening and pain as reported on visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: At baseline of treatment there were no significant differences among the groups for VAS scores, as well as for the range of mandibular movement. VAS scores improved significantly over time for the SS&PT group (F=28.964, p=0.0001, effect size =0.853) and SS group (F=8.794, p=0.001, effect size =0.638). The range of mouth opening improved significantly only in the SS&PT group (MCO: F=20.971, p=0.006; MAO: F=24.014, p=0.004) (Figure 2). Changes in path of mouth opening differ significantly between the groups (p=0.040). Only 1 patient in SS&PT group still presented deviations in mouth opening after completed therapy while in the SS group deviations were present in 5 patients after completed therapy. Conclusion: This limited study gave evidence that during the treatment period lasting for 6 months, the simultaneous use of stabilization splint and physical therapy was more efficient in reducing deviations and improving range of mouth opening than the stabilization splint used alone. Both treatment options were efficient in reducing pain in patients with anterior disc displacement without reduction. Despite of objectively diagnosed disruption of temporomandibular joint anatomy, physiological function was regained.http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/206540Temporomandibular JointDislocationsPainOcclusal SplintsExercise TherapyPhysical Therapy Modalities
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marijana Gikić
Melita Valentić-Peruzović
Iva Z. Alajbeg
spellingShingle Marijana Gikić
Melita Valentić-Peruzović
Iva Z. Alajbeg
Mandibular Range of Movement and Pain Intensity in Patients with Anterior Disc Displacement without Reduction
Acta Stomatologica Croatica
Temporomandibular Joint
Dislocations
Pain
Occlusal Splints
Exercise Therapy
Physical Therapy Modalities
author_facet Marijana Gikić
Melita Valentić-Peruzović
Iva Z. Alajbeg
author_sort Marijana Gikić
title Mandibular Range of Movement and Pain Intensity in Patients with Anterior Disc Displacement without Reduction
title_short Mandibular Range of Movement and Pain Intensity in Patients with Anterior Disc Displacement without Reduction
title_full Mandibular Range of Movement and Pain Intensity in Patients with Anterior Disc Displacement without Reduction
title_fullStr Mandibular Range of Movement and Pain Intensity in Patients with Anterior Disc Displacement without Reduction
title_full_unstemmed Mandibular Range of Movement and Pain Intensity in Patients with Anterior Disc Displacement without Reduction
title_sort mandibular range of movement and pain intensity in patients with anterior disc displacement without reduction
publisher University of Zagreb. School of Dental Medicine
series Acta Stomatologica Croatica
issn 0001-7019
1846-0410
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Objective: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are the most common source of orofacial pain of a non-dental origin. The study was performed to investigate the therapeutic effect of the conventional occlusal splint therapy and the physical therapy. The hypothesis tested was that the simultaneous use of occlusal splint and physical therapy is an effective method for treatment of anterior disc displacement without reduction. Materials and Methods: Twelve patients (mean age =30.5 y) with anterior disc displacement without reduction (according to RDC/TMD and confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging) were randomly allocated into 2 groups: 6 received stabilization splint (SS) and 6 received both physical therapy and stabilization splint (SS&PT). Treatment outcomes included pain-free opening (MCO), maximum assisted opening (MAO), path of mouth opening and pain as reported on visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: At baseline of treatment there were no significant differences among the groups for VAS scores, as well as for the range of mandibular movement. VAS scores improved significantly over time for the SS&PT group (F=28.964, p=0.0001, effect size =0.853) and SS group (F=8.794, p=0.001, effect size =0.638). The range of mouth opening improved significantly only in the SS&PT group (MCO: F=20.971, p=0.006; MAO: F=24.014, p=0.004) (Figure 2). Changes in path of mouth opening differ significantly between the groups (p=0.040). Only 1 patient in SS&PT group still presented deviations in mouth opening after completed therapy while in the SS group deviations were present in 5 patients after completed therapy. Conclusion: This limited study gave evidence that during the treatment period lasting for 6 months, the simultaneous use of stabilization splint and physical therapy was more efficient in reducing deviations and improving range of mouth opening than the stabilization splint used alone. Both treatment options were efficient in reducing pain in patients with anterior disc displacement without reduction. Despite of objectively diagnosed disruption of temporomandibular joint anatomy, physiological function was regained.
topic Temporomandibular Joint
Dislocations
Pain
Occlusal Splints
Exercise Therapy
Physical Therapy Modalities
url http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/206540
work_keys_str_mv AT marijanagikic mandibularrangeofmovementandpainintensityinpatientswithanteriordiscdisplacementwithoutreduction
AT melitavalenticperuzovic mandibularrangeofmovementandpainintensityinpatientswithanteriordiscdisplacementwithoutreduction
AT ivazalajbeg mandibularrangeofmovementandpainintensityinpatientswithanteriordiscdisplacementwithoutreduction
_version_ 1725455014505218048