A Neuroeconomics Analysis of Investment Process with Money Flow Information: The Error-Related Negativity

This investigation is among the first ones to analyze the neural basis of an investment process with money flow information of financial market, using a simplified task where volunteers had to choose to buy or not to buy stocks based on the display of positive or negative money flow information. Aft...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cuicui Wang, João Paulo Vieito, Qingguo Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/701237
id doaj-15856d8a87e2449ca1aac2f240a1f270
record_format Article
spelling doaj-15856d8a87e2449ca1aac2f240a1f2702020-11-24T23:47:24ZengHindawi LimitedComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience1687-52651687-52732015-01-01201510.1155/2015/701237701237A Neuroeconomics Analysis of Investment Process with Money Flow Information: The Error-Related NegativityCuicui Wang0João Paulo Vieito1Qingguo Ma2School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, ChinaSchool of Business Studies, Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo, 4920311 Viana do Castelo, PortugalSchool of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, ChinaThis investigation is among the first ones to analyze the neural basis of an investment process with money flow information of financial market, using a simplified task where volunteers had to choose to buy or not to buy stocks based on the display of positive or negative money flow information. After choosing “to buy” or “not to buy,” participants were presented with feedback. At the same time, event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to record investor’s brain activity and capture the event-related negativity (ERN) and feedback-related negativity (FRN) components. The results of ERN suggested that there might be a higher risk and more conflict when buying stocks with negative net money flow information than positive net money flow information, and the inverse was also true for the “not to buy” stocks option. The FRN component evoked by the bad outcome of a decision was more negative than that by the good outcome, which reflected the difference between the values of the actual and expected outcome. From the research, we could further understand how investors perceived money flow information of financial market and the neural cognitive effect in investment process.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/701237
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cuicui Wang
João Paulo Vieito
Qingguo Ma
spellingShingle Cuicui Wang
João Paulo Vieito
Qingguo Ma
A Neuroeconomics Analysis of Investment Process with Money Flow Information: The Error-Related Negativity
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
author_facet Cuicui Wang
João Paulo Vieito
Qingguo Ma
author_sort Cuicui Wang
title A Neuroeconomics Analysis of Investment Process with Money Flow Information: The Error-Related Negativity
title_short A Neuroeconomics Analysis of Investment Process with Money Flow Information: The Error-Related Negativity
title_full A Neuroeconomics Analysis of Investment Process with Money Flow Information: The Error-Related Negativity
title_fullStr A Neuroeconomics Analysis of Investment Process with Money Flow Information: The Error-Related Negativity
title_full_unstemmed A Neuroeconomics Analysis of Investment Process with Money Flow Information: The Error-Related Negativity
title_sort neuroeconomics analysis of investment process with money flow information: the error-related negativity
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
issn 1687-5265
1687-5273
publishDate 2015-01-01
description This investigation is among the first ones to analyze the neural basis of an investment process with money flow information of financial market, using a simplified task where volunteers had to choose to buy or not to buy stocks based on the display of positive or negative money flow information. After choosing “to buy” or “not to buy,” participants were presented with feedback. At the same time, event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to record investor’s brain activity and capture the event-related negativity (ERN) and feedback-related negativity (FRN) components. The results of ERN suggested that there might be a higher risk and more conflict when buying stocks with negative net money flow information than positive net money flow information, and the inverse was also true for the “not to buy” stocks option. The FRN component evoked by the bad outcome of a decision was more negative than that by the good outcome, which reflected the difference between the values of the actual and expected outcome. From the research, we could further understand how investors perceived money flow information of financial market and the neural cognitive effect in investment process.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/701237
work_keys_str_mv AT cuicuiwang aneuroeconomicsanalysisofinvestmentprocesswithmoneyflowinformationtheerrorrelatednegativity
AT joaopaulovieito aneuroeconomicsanalysisofinvestmentprocesswithmoneyflowinformationtheerrorrelatednegativity
AT qingguoma aneuroeconomicsanalysisofinvestmentprocesswithmoneyflowinformationtheerrorrelatednegativity
AT cuicuiwang neuroeconomicsanalysisofinvestmentprocesswithmoneyflowinformationtheerrorrelatednegativity
AT joaopaulovieito neuroeconomicsanalysisofinvestmentprocesswithmoneyflowinformationtheerrorrelatednegativity
AT qingguoma neuroeconomicsanalysisofinvestmentprocesswithmoneyflowinformationtheerrorrelatednegativity
_version_ 1725489938723504128