Fringe or Not Fringe? Strategies for Localizing Supported Accommodation in a Post‐Deinstitutional Era

Finding suitable locations for supported accommodations is crucial both for the wellbeing of individuals with psychiatric disabilities (PD) and to achieve the objectives of the mental health care reform in order to create opportunities for social inclusion. This article explores municipal strategies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Fjellfeldt, Ebba Högström, Lina Berglund-Snodgrass, Urban Markström
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2021-08-01
Series:Social Inclusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4319
id doaj-1572e03b469e43ba943d5d028dba51a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1572e03b469e43ba943d5d028dba51a52021-08-26T10:32:42ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032021-08-019320121310.17645/si.v9i3.43192120Fringe or Not Fringe? Strategies for Localizing Supported Accommodation in a Post‐Deinstitutional EraMaria Fjellfeldt0Ebba Högström1Lina Berglund-Snodgrass2Urban Markström3Department of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, SwedenDepartment of Spatial Planning, Blekinge Institute of Technology, SwedenDepartment of Spatial Planning, Blekinge Institute of Technology, SwedenDepartment of Social Work, Umeå University, SwedenFinding suitable locations for supported accommodations is crucial both for the wellbeing of individuals with psychiatric disabilities (PD) and to achieve the objectives of the mental health care reform in order to create opportunities for social inclusion. This article explores municipal strategies for localizing supported accommodations for people with PD. In a multiple case study, interviews with 20 municipal civil servants from social services and urban planning were conducted. Three strategies were identified and further analyzed with a public location theory approach: (1) re‐use, i.e., using existing facilities for a new purpose, (2) fill‐in, i.e., infilling new purpose‐built facilities in existing neighborhoods, and (3) insert, i.e., inserting new premises or facilities as part of a new development. The article shows that the “re‐use” strategy was employed primarily for pragmatic reasons, but also because re‐using former care facilities was found to cause less conflicts, as residents were supposedly used to neighbors with special needs. When the “fill‐in” and “insert” strategies were employed, new accommodations were more often located on the outskirts of neighborhoods. This was a way to balance potential conflicts between residents in ordinary housing and residents in supported accommodations, but also to meet alleged viewpoints of service users’ need for a quiet and secluded accommodation. Furthermore, ideas associated with social services’ view of social inclusion and urban planning’s notion of “tricky” tenants significantly influenced localization strategies. Finally, this article is also a call for more empirical research on the decision‐making processes, use of strategies (intended or not) and spatial outcomes, when localizing supported accommodation for people with PD and other groups in need of support and service.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4319municipal localization strategiespsychiatric disabilitiespublic facility locationsocial inclusionsupported accommodation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Fjellfeldt
Ebba Högström
Lina Berglund-Snodgrass
Urban Markström
spellingShingle Maria Fjellfeldt
Ebba Högström
Lina Berglund-Snodgrass
Urban Markström
Fringe or Not Fringe? Strategies for Localizing Supported Accommodation in a Post‐Deinstitutional Era
Social Inclusion
municipal localization strategies
psychiatric disabilities
public facility location
social inclusion
supported accommodation
author_facet Maria Fjellfeldt
Ebba Högström
Lina Berglund-Snodgrass
Urban Markström
author_sort Maria Fjellfeldt
title Fringe or Not Fringe? Strategies for Localizing Supported Accommodation in a Post‐Deinstitutional Era
title_short Fringe or Not Fringe? Strategies for Localizing Supported Accommodation in a Post‐Deinstitutional Era
title_full Fringe or Not Fringe? Strategies for Localizing Supported Accommodation in a Post‐Deinstitutional Era
title_fullStr Fringe or Not Fringe? Strategies for Localizing Supported Accommodation in a Post‐Deinstitutional Era
title_full_unstemmed Fringe or Not Fringe? Strategies for Localizing Supported Accommodation in a Post‐Deinstitutional Era
title_sort fringe or not fringe? strategies for localizing supported accommodation in a post‐deinstitutional era
publisher Cogitatio
series Social Inclusion
issn 2183-2803
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Finding suitable locations for supported accommodations is crucial both for the wellbeing of individuals with psychiatric disabilities (PD) and to achieve the objectives of the mental health care reform in order to create opportunities for social inclusion. This article explores municipal strategies for localizing supported accommodations for people with PD. In a multiple case study, interviews with 20 municipal civil servants from social services and urban planning were conducted. Three strategies were identified and further analyzed with a public location theory approach: (1) re‐use, i.e., using existing facilities for a new purpose, (2) fill‐in, i.e., infilling new purpose‐built facilities in existing neighborhoods, and (3) insert, i.e., inserting new premises or facilities as part of a new development. The article shows that the “re‐use” strategy was employed primarily for pragmatic reasons, but also because re‐using former care facilities was found to cause less conflicts, as residents were supposedly used to neighbors with special needs. When the “fill‐in” and “insert” strategies were employed, new accommodations were more often located on the outskirts of neighborhoods. This was a way to balance potential conflicts between residents in ordinary housing and residents in supported accommodations, but also to meet alleged viewpoints of service users’ need for a quiet and secluded accommodation. Furthermore, ideas associated with social services’ view of social inclusion and urban planning’s notion of “tricky” tenants significantly influenced localization strategies. Finally, this article is also a call for more empirical research on the decision‐making processes, use of strategies (intended or not) and spatial outcomes, when localizing supported accommodation for people with PD and other groups in need of support and service.
topic municipal localization strategies
psychiatric disabilities
public facility location
social inclusion
supported accommodation
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4319
work_keys_str_mv AT mariafjellfeldt fringeornotfringestrategiesforlocalizingsupportedaccommodationinapostdeinstitutionalera
AT ebbahogstrom fringeornotfringestrategiesforlocalizingsupportedaccommodationinapostdeinstitutionalera
AT linaberglundsnodgrass fringeornotfringestrategiesforlocalizingsupportedaccommodationinapostdeinstitutionalera
AT urbanmarkstrom fringeornotfringestrategiesforlocalizingsupportedaccommodationinapostdeinstitutionalera
_version_ 1721195653436014592