Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación
The social history of spatial planning is a key element in the critical reevaluation of urban and territorial policies. In order to engage planning in the recovery of the commons and the formation of more democratic environments we need to understand its role in the historical production of our pres...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)
2014-08-01
|
Series: | EMPIRIA: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://e-spacio.uned.es/revistasuned/index.php/empiria/article/view/10862/10969 |
id |
doaj-15631d88f15e46b4bb10f9c71a61cb2b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-15631d88f15e46b4bb10f9c71a61cb2b2020-11-25T01:15:18ZspaUniversidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)EMPIRIA: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales1139-57372174-06822014-08-012727497210.5944/empiria.27.2014.10862Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificaciónÁlvaro Sevilla Buitrago0Universidad Politécnica de MadridThe social history of spatial planning is a key element in the critical reevaluation of urban and territorial policies. In order to engage planning in the recovery of the commons and the formation of more democratic environments we need to understand its role in the historical production of our present sociospatial structures. This historiographical approach provides an alternative account of the sociopolitical genesis of contemporary planning discourses, techniques and practices, describing their effects and impact on the everyday lives of planned populations. This article analyzes several conceptual and methodological moments of this research project. Firstly I suggest that we use Gramsci’s conceptualization of ‘hegemony‘ and Foucault’s ‘governmentality’ in order to understand the articulation between politics and everyday life in the context of a general social history. This theoretical framework is then translated into spatial terms through the concepts of ‘territory’ and ‘territoriality’. Finally, I study how planning has been mobilized throughout history by particular hegemonic/governmental projects in order to spatially regulate the processes of social reproduction, in a context shaped by struggles of territorility.http://e-spacio.uned.es/revistasuned/index.php/empiria/article/view/10862/10969social reproductionhegemonygovernmentalityeveryday lifeterritoriality |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Álvaro Sevilla Buitrago |
spellingShingle |
Álvaro Sevilla Buitrago Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación EMPIRIA: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales social reproduction hegemony governmentality everyday life territoriality |
author_facet |
Álvaro Sevilla Buitrago |
author_sort |
Álvaro Sevilla Buitrago |
title |
Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación |
title_short |
Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación |
title_full |
Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación |
title_fullStr |
Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación |
title_sort |
hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación |
publisher |
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED) |
series |
EMPIRIA: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales |
issn |
1139-5737 2174-0682 |
publishDate |
2014-08-01 |
description |
The social history of spatial planning is a key element in the critical reevaluation of urban and territorial policies. In order to engage planning in the recovery of the commons and the formation of more democratic environments we need to understand its role in the historical production of our present sociospatial structures. This historiographical approach provides an alternative account of the sociopolitical genesis of contemporary planning discourses, techniques and practices, describing their effects and impact on the everyday lives of planned populations. This article analyzes several conceptual and methodological moments of this research project. Firstly I suggest that we use Gramsci’s conceptualization of ‘hegemony‘ and Foucault’s ‘governmentality’ in order to understand the articulation between politics and everyday life in the context of a general social history. This theoretical framework is then translated into spatial terms through the concepts of ‘territory’ and ‘territoriality’. Finally, I study how planning has been mobilized throughout history by particular hegemonic/governmental projects in order to spatially regulate the processes of social reproduction, in a context shaped by struggles of territorility. |
topic |
social reproduction hegemony governmentality everyday life territoriality |
url |
http://e-spacio.uned.es/revistasuned/index.php/empiria/article/view/10862/10969 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alvarosevillabuitrago hegemoniagubernamentalidadterritorioapuntesmetodologicosparaunahistoriasocialdelaplanificacion |
_version_ |
1725154074021593088 |