Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación

The social history of spatial planning is a key element in the critical reevaluation of urban and territorial policies. In order to engage planning in the recovery of the commons and the formation of more democratic environments we need to understand its role in the historical production of our pres...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Álvaro Sevilla Buitrago
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED) 2014-08-01
Series:EMPIRIA: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales
Subjects:
Online Access:http://e-spacio.uned.es/revistasuned/index.php/empiria/article/view/10862/10969
id doaj-15631d88f15e46b4bb10f9c71a61cb2b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-15631d88f15e46b4bb10f9c71a61cb2b2020-11-25T01:15:18ZspaUniversidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)EMPIRIA: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales1139-57372174-06822014-08-012727497210.5944/empiria.27.2014.10862Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificaciónÁlvaro Sevilla Buitrago0Universidad Politécnica de MadridThe social history of spatial planning is a key element in the critical reevaluation of urban and territorial policies. In order to engage planning in the recovery of the commons and the formation of more democratic environments we need to understand its role in the historical production of our present sociospatial structures. This historiographical approach provides an alternative account of the sociopolitical genesis of contemporary planning discourses, techniques and practices, describing their effects and impact on the everyday lives of planned populations. This article analyzes several conceptual and methodological moments of this research project. Firstly I suggest that we use Gramsci’s conceptualization of ‘hegemony‘ and Foucault’s ‘governmentality’ in order to understand the articulation between politics and everyday life in the context of a general social history. This theoretical framework is then translated into spatial terms through the concepts of ‘territory’ and ‘territoriality’. Finally, I study how planning has been mobilized throughout history by particular hegemonic/governmental projects in order to spatially regulate the processes of social reproduction, in a context shaped by struggles of territorility.http://e-spacio.uned.es/revistasuned/index.php/empiria/article/view/10862/10969social reproductionhegemonygovernmentalityeveryday lifeterritoriality
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Álvaro Sevilla Buitrago
spellingShingle Álvaro Sevilla Buitrago
Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación
EMPIRIA: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales
social reproduction
hegemony
governmentality
everyday life
territoriality
author_facet Álvaro Sevilla Buitrago
author_sort Álvaro Sevilla Buitrago
title Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación
title_short Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación
title_full Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación
title_fullStr Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación
title_full_unstemmed Hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. Apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación
title_sort hegemonía, gubernamentalidad, territorio. apuntes metodológicos para una historia social de la planificación
publisher Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)
series EMPIRIA: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales
issn 1139-5737
2174-0682
publishDate 2014-08-01
description The social history of spatial planning is a key element in the critical reevaluation of urban and territorial policies. In order to engage planning in the recovery of the commons and the formation of more democratic environments we need to understand its role in the historical production of our present sociospatial structures. This historiographical approach provides an alternative account of the sociopolitical genesis of contemporary planning discourses, techniques and practices, describing their effects and impact on the everyday lives of planned populations. This article analyzes several conceptual and methodological moments of this research project. Firstly I suggest that we use Gramsci’s conceptualization of ‘hegemony‘ and Foucault’s ‘governmentality’ in order to understand the articulation between politics and everyday life in the context of a general social history. This theoretical framework is then translated into spatial terms through the concepts of ‘territory’ and ‘territoriality’. Finally, I study how planning has been mobilized throughout history by particular hegemonic/governmental projects in order to spatially regulate the processes of social reproduction, in a context shaped by struggles of territorility.
topic social reproduction
hegemony
governmentality
everyday life
territoriality
url http://e-spacio.uned.es/revistasuned/index.php/empiria/article/view/10862/10969
work_keys_str_mv AT alvarosevillabuitrago hegemoniagubernamentalidadterritorioapuntesmetodologicosparaunahistoriasocialdelaplanificacion
_version_ 1725154074021593088