Comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with rapid plasma reagin for screening of syphilis in blood donors

World Health Organization (WHO) recommends screening of syphilis in low prevalence populations of blood donors by treponemal tests like enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), whereas in India screening is done by rapid plasma reagin (RPR). The present pilot study evaluated the performance of ELI...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suchet Sachdev, Arun Kumar Sharma, Sunil Sethi, Sachin Garg, Divjot Singh Lamba, Ratti Ram Sharma, Neelam Marwaha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Asian Journal of Transfusion Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ajts.org/article.asp?issn=0973-6247;year=2018;volume=12;issue=2;spage=165;epage=168;aulast=Sachdev
id doaj-15598cba701046ea8f9cde21249f79c6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-15598cba701046ea8f9cde21249f79c62020-11-24T21:27:20ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAsian Journal of Transfusion Science0973-62471998-35652018-01-0112216516810.4103/ajts.AJTS_126_17Comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with rapid plasma reagin for screening of syphilis in blood donorsSuchet SachdevArun Kumar SharmaSunil SethiSachin GargDivjot Singh LambaRatti Ram SharmaNeelam MarwahaWorld Health Organization (WHO) recommends screening of syphilis in low prevalence populations of blood donors by treponemal tests like enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), whereas in India screening is done by rapid plasma reagin (RPR). The present pilot study evaluated the performance of ELISA compared to RPR, keeping Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay as a reference test. ELISA was equally sensitive (100%), more specific (56.3% vs. 0%), more accurate (83.7% vs. 62.7%), had better positive predictive value (79.4% vs. 62.8%) and negative predictive value (100% vs. 0%), and less biological false positivity (37.2% vs. 20.6%) when compared to RPR. The WHO recommendations of screening for syphilis in low prevalence population of blood donors using ELISA may be adopted for usage in transfusion services that have the facility of ELISA.http://www.ajts.org/article.asp?issn=0973-6247;year=2018;volume=12;issue=2;spage=165;epage=168;aulast=SachdevBiological false positivityenzyme-linked immunosorbent assaynegative predictive valuepositive predictive valuerapid plasma reaginsyphilisTreponema pallidum hemagglutination assayVenereal Disease Research Laboratory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suchet Sachdev
Arun Kumar Sharma
Sunil Sethi
Sachin Garg
Divjot Singh Lamba
Ratti Ram Sharma
Neelam Marwaha
spellingShingle Suchet Sachdev
Arun Kumar Sharma
Sunil Sethi
Sachin Garg
Divjot Singh Lamba
Ratti Ram Sharma
Neelam Marwaha
Comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with rapid plasma reagin for screening of syphilis in blood donors
Asian Journal of Transfusion Science
Biological false positivity
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
negative predictive value
positive predictive value
rapid plasma reagin
syphilis
Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay
Venereal Disease Research Laboratory
author_facet Suchet Sachdev
Arun Kumar Sharma
Sunil Sethi
Sachin Garg
Divjot Singh Lamba
Ratti Ram Sharma
Neelam Marwaha
author_sort Suchet Sachdev
title Comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with rapid plasma reagin for screening of syphilis in blood donors
title_short Comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with rapid plasma reagin for screening of syphilis in blood donors
title_full Comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with rapid plasma reagin for screening of syphilis in blood donors
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with rapid plasma reagin for screening of syphilis in blood donors
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with rapid plasma reagin for screening of syphilis in blood donors
title_sort comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with rapid plasma reagin for screening of syphilis in blood donors
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Asian Journal of Transfusion Science
issn 0973-6247
1998-3565
publishDate 2018-01-01
description World Health Organization (WHO) recommends screening of syphilis in low prevalence populations of blood donors by treponemal tests like enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), whereas in India screening is done by rapid plasma reagin (RPR). The present pilot study evaluated the performance of ELISA compared to RPR, keeping Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay as a reference test. ELISA was equally sensitive (100%), more specific (56.3% vs. 0%), more accurate (83.7% vs. 62.7%), had better positive predictive value (79.4% vs. 62.8%) and negative predictive value (100% vs. 0%), and less biological false positivity (37.2% vs. 20.6%) when compared to RPR. The WHO recommendations of screening for syphilis in low prevalence population of blood donors using ELISA may be adopted for usage in transfusion services that have the facility of ELISA.
topic Biological false positivity
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
negative predictive value
positive predictive value
rapid plasma reagin
syphilis
Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay
Venereal Disease Research Laboratory
url http://www.ajts.org/article.asp?issn=0973-6247;year=2018;volume=12;issue=2;spage=165;epage=168;aulast=Sachdev
work_keys_str_mv AT suchetsachdev comparativeevaluationofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaywithrapidplasmareaginforscreeningofsyphilisinblooddonors
AT arunkumarsharma comparativeevaluationofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaywithrapidplasmareaginforscreeningofsyphilisinblooddonors
AT sunilsethi comparativeevaluationofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaywithrapidplasmareaginforscreeningofsyphilisinblooddonors
AT sachingarg comparativeevaluationofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaywithrapidplasmareaginforscreeningofsyphilisinblooddonors
AT divjotsinghlamba comparativeevaluationofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaywithrapidplasmareaginforscreeningofsyphilisinblooddonors
AT rattiramsharma comparativeevaluationofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaywithrapidplasmareaginforscreeningofsyphilisinblooddonors
AT neelammarwaha comparativeevaluationofenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaywithrapidplasmareaginforscreeningofsyphilisinblooddonors
_version_ 1725975350388719616