Clinical effectiveness of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic review

Background Omental transposition has been used to facilitate perineal wound healing in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR). However, there is no high-level evidence supporting the effectiveness of omental transposition in this regard. This study aimed to investigate the clinical eff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sungjin Kim, Sung Il Kang, Sohyun Kim, Jae Hwang Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Yeungnam University College of Medicine 2021-07-01
Series:Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-yujm.org/upload/pdf/yujm-2020-00871.pdf
id doaj-155416bbcdcf4d70b461163938e786de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-155416bbcdcf4d70b461163938e786de2021-06-22T00:18:48ZengYeungnam University College of MedicineYeungnam University Journal of Medicine2384-02932021-07-0138321922410.12701/yujm.2020.008712630Clinical effectiveness of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic reviewSungjin Kim0Sung Il Kang1Sohyun Kim2Jae Hwang Kim3 Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu, Korea Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, KoreaBackground Omental transposition has been used to facilitate perineal wound healing in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR). However, there is no high-level evidence supporting the effectiveness of omental transposition in this regard. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after APR. Methods In this systematic review, we systematically searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for literature regarding the topic of our study. Studies published since the inception of each database were considered for review. The outcomes of interest were the perineal wound healing rate at 1 and 3 months postoperatively, perineal wound infection rate, and perineal wound healing period. Results Of the 1,923 studies identified, four articles representing 819 patients (omental transposition patients, n=295) were included in the final analysis. The wound healing rates at 1 and 3 months postoperatively in the omental transposition group (68.5% and 79.7%, respectively) did not significantly differ from those in the control group (57.4% and 78.7%, respectively) (p=0.759 and p=0.731, respectively). Perineal wound infection and chronic wound complication rates, including sinus, dehiscence, and fistula rates, also did not significantly differ between the omental transposition (8% and 7%, respectively) and control (11% and 7%, respectively) groups (p=0.221 and p=0.790, respectively). Conclusion Our results suggest that omental transposition does not affect perineal wound healing in patients who undergo APR.http://www.e-yujm.org/upload/pdf/yujm-2020-00871.pdfabdominoperineal resectionomental transpositionperineal woundwound healing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sungjin Kim
Sung Il Kang
Sohyun Kim
Jae Hwang Kim
spellingShingle Sungjin Kim
Sung Il Kang
Sohyun Kim
Jae Hwang Kim
Clinical effectiveness of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic review
Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine
abdominoperineal resection
omental transposition
perineal wound
wound healing
author_facet Sungjin Kim
Sung Il Kang
Sohyun Kim
Jae Hwang Kim
author_sort Sungjin Kim
title Clinical effectiveness of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic review
title_short Clinical effectiveness of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic review
title_full Clinical effectiveness of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical effectiveness of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical effectiveness of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic review
title_sort clinical effectiveness of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic review
publisher Yeungnam University College of Medicine
series Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine
issn 2384-0293
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Background Omental transposition has been used to facilitate perineal wound healing in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR). However, there is no high-level evidence supporting the effectiveness of omental transposition in this regard. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after APR. Methods In this systematic review, we systematically searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for literature regarding the topic of our study. Studies published since the inception of each database were considered for review. The outcomes of interest were the perineal wound healing rate at 1 and 3 months postoperatively, perineal wound infection rate, and perineal wound healing period. Results Of the 1,923 studies identified, four articles representing 819 patients (omental transposition patients, n=295) were included in the final analysis. The wound healing rates at 1 and 3 months postoperatively in the omental transposition group (68.5% and 79.7%, respectively) did not significantly differ from those in the control group (57.4% and 78.7%, respectively) (p=0.759 and p=0.731, respectively). Perineal wound infection and chronic wound complication rates, including sinus, dehiscence, and fistula rates, also did not significantly differ between the omental transposition (8% and 7%, respectively) and control (11% and 7%, respectively) groups (p=0.221 and p=0.790, respectively). Conclusion Our results suggest that omental transposition does not affect perineal wound healing in patients who undergo APR.
topic abdominoperineal resection
omental transposition
perineal wound
wound healing
url http://www.e-yujm.org/upload/pdf/yujm-2020-00871.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sungjinkim clinicaleffectivenessofomentaltranspositioninfacilitatingperinealwoundhealingafterabdominoperinealresectionasystematicreview
AT sungilkang clinicaleffectivenessofomentaltranspositioninfacilitatingperinealwoundhealingafterabdominoperinealresectionasystematicreview
AT sohyunkim clinicaleffectivenessofomentaltranspositioninfacilitatingperinealwoundhealingafterabdominoperinealresectionasystematicreview
AT jaehwangkim clinicaleffectivenessofomentaltranspositioninfacilitatingperinealwoundhealingafterabdominoperinealresectionasystematicreview
_version_ 1721363887236841472