Wolves without borders: Transboundary survival of wolves in Banff National Park over three decades

Large carnivores are important ecological drivers of ecosystem dynamics when they occur at ecologically effective densities. They are also challenging to conserve, especially in transboundary settings such as along borders of parks and protected areas. Here, we tested for effects of transboundary mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark Hebblewhite, Jesse Whittington
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-12-01
Series:Global Ecology and Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989420308349
id doaj-154fea1eb6c949e3b9906e5266fc5c98
record_format Article
spelling doaj-154fea1eb6c949e3b9906e5266fc5c982020-12-31T04:42:31ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942020-12-0124e01293Wolves without borders: Transboundary survival of wolves in Banff National Park over three decadesMark Hebblewhite0Jesse Whittington1Wildlife Biology Program, Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT, 59801, USA; Corresponding author.Parks Canada Agency, Banff National Park, Banff, Alberta, T1L 1K2, CanadaLarge carnivores are important ecological drivers of ecosystem dynamics when they occur at ecologically effective densities. They are also challenging to conserve, especially in transboundary settings such as along borders of parks and protected areas. Here, we tested for effects of transboundary movements on survival of 72 radiocollared gray wolves from 1987 to 2018 in and adjacent to Banff National Park, Canada. We fit Bayesian counting-process survival models to known-fate radiotelemetry data and tested for the influence of intrinsic covariates such as sex and age, time, and movements outside of protected areas on survival of wolves. We also estimated cause-specific mortality. Non-parametric survival was 0.733 (95% CI 0.622–0.816), and the top Bayesian survival model indicated that wolves outside the park had much lower annual survival rates (0.44, 95% BCI = 0.24–0.65) compared to wolves inside the park (0.84, 95% BCI = 0.73–0.91). The cumulative risk of mortality was on average 6.7 times higher (odds ratio 95% BCI = 2.2–21.4) for wolves outside the park, peaking during the winter hunting and trapping seasons. We found weak evidence for declining survival over time, opposite to patterns predicted by density-dependence. Bayesian cause-specific mortality indicated that the top three sources of mortality were trapping (rate = 0.080, 36% of mortality), followed by hunting (0.053, 18%), and highway (0.046, 18%) mortality. Surprisingly, we found no intraspecific mortality, and low dispersal from Banff National Park. This demographic profile is akin to other exploited populations across North America. While we were unable to combine survival rates with reproduction to estimate population trends, the overall mortality rates within our study area are consistent with a stable wolf population. Nonetheless, the long-term stability and ecological effectiveness of wolves likely differed inside and outside of protected areas, which highlights a challenge with managing transboundary carnivores exposed to different management regimes.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989420308349YellowstoneCarnivoreExploitationHuntingMortalityTrapping
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark Hebblewhite
Jesse Whittington
spellingShingle Mark Hebblewhite
Jesse Whittington
Wolves without borders: Transboundary survival of wolves in Banff National Park over three decades
Global Ecology and Conservation
Yellowstone
Carnivore
Exploitation
Hunting
Mortality
Trapping
author_facet Mark Hebblewhite
Jesse Whittington
author_sort Mark Hebblewhite
title Wolves without borders: Transboundary survival of wolves in Banff National Park over three decades
title_short Wolves without borders: Transboundary survival of wolves in Banff National Park over three decades
title_full Wolves without borders: Transboundary survival of wolves in Banff National Park over three decades
title_fullStr Wolves without borders: Transboundary survival of wolves in Banff National Park over three decades
title_full_unstemmed Wolves without borders: Transboundary survival of wolves in Banff National Park over three decades
title_sort wolves without borders: transboundary survival of wolves in banff national park over three decades
publisher Elsevier
series Global Ecology and Conservation
issn 2351-9894
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Large carnivores are important ecological drivers of ecosystem dynamics when they occur at ecologically effective densities. They are also challenging to conserve, especially in transboundary settings such as along borders of parks and protected areas. Here, we tested for effects of transboundary movements on survival of 72 radiocollared gray wolves from 1987 to 2018 in and adjacent to Banff National Park, Canada. We fit Bayesian counting-process survival models to known-fate radiotelemetry data and tested for the influence of intrinsic covariates such as sex and age, time, and movements outside of protected areas on survival of wolves. We also estimated cause-specific mortality. Non-parametric survival was 0.733 (95% CI 0.622–0.816), and the top Bayesian survival model indicated that wolves outside the park had much lower annual survival rates (0.44, 95% BCI = 0.24–0.65) compared to wolves inside the park (0.84, 95% BCI = 0.73–0.91). The cumulative risk of mortality was on average 6.7 times higher (odds ratio 95% BCI = 2.2–21.4) for wolves outside the park, peaking during the winter hunting and trapping seasons. We found weak evidence for declining survival over time, opposite to patterns predicted by density-dependence. Bayesian cause-specific mortality indicated that the top three sources of mortality were trapping (rate = 0.080, 36% of mortality), followed by hunting (0.053, 18%), and highway (0.046, 18%) mortality. Surprisingly, we found no intraspecific mortality, and low dispersal from Banff National Park. This demographic profile is akin to other exploited populations across North America. While we were unable to combine survival rates with reproduction to estimate population trends, the overall mortality rates within our study area are consistent with a stable wolf population. Nonetheless, the long-term stability and ecological effectiveness of wolves likely differed inside and outside of protected areas, which highlights a challenge with managing transboundary carnivores exposed to different management regimes.
topic Yellowstone
Carnivore
Exploitation
Hunting
Mortality
Trapping
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989420308349
work_keys_str_mv AT markhebblewhite wolveswithoutborderstransboundarysurvivalofwolvesinbanffnationalparkoverthreedecades
AT jessewhittington wolveswithoutborderstransboundarysurvivalofwolvesinbanffnationalparkoverthreedecades
_version_ 1724364953150816256