Comparison of two minimally invasive restorative techniques in improving the oral health-related quality of life of pregnant women: a six months randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Women tend to delay dental treatment due to misconceptions regarding the safety of dental procedures during pregnancy which may negatively affect their quality of life. Minimally invasive restorative techniques offer alternatives for caries treatment and can improve their oral he...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: May M. Adham, Mona K. El Kashlan, Wafaa E. Abdelaziz, Ahmed S. Rashad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-04-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01581-5
id doaj-152bf96db53b4148b1d87058b08799da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-152bf96db53b4148b1d87058b08799da2021-05-02T11:42:25ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312021-04-012111910.1186/s12903-021-01581-5Comparison of two minimally invasive restorative techniques in improving the oral health-related quality of life of pregnant women: a six months randomized controlled trialMay M. Adham0Mona K. El Kashlan1Wafaa E. Abdelaziz2Ahmed S. Rashad3Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria UniversityDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria UniversityDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria UniversityDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Commerce, Damanhour UniversityAbstract Background Women tend to delay dental treatment due to misconceptions regarding the safety of dental procedures during pregnancy which may negatively affect their quality of life. Minimally invasive restorative techniques offer alternatives for caries treatment and can improve their oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) during this stage. Methods A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in 2019 and included 162 pregnant women visiting public family health centers in Alexandria, Egypt, with mild to moderate dental pain due to caries. Participants were randomly assigned into Papacarie-Duo group (n = 82) and ART group (n = 80). The outcome variable was percent change in OHRQoL (oral health impact profile, OHIP-14) after 6 months. T test/Mann Whitney U test were used to compare groups and a multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the factors affecting the outcome variable. Results A significant reduction (P < 0.002) was noted in OHIP-14 between baseline and 6 months indicating improvement in OHRQoL in the Papacarie-Duo and ART groups (16.26% and 18.91%, P = 0.120 in bivariate analysis). Multiple linear regression revealed significantly greater reduction in OHIP-14 scores in the Papacarie-Duo than the ART group (regression coefficient = 4.03, 95% confidence interval: 0.652, 7.409, P = 0.020). Conclusion Minimally invasive restorative techniques, such as ART and chemo-mechanical caries removal using Papacarie- Duo can improve the OHRQoL of pregnant women suffering from mild to moderate pain due to dental caries. Significantly more improvement was noted in the Papacarie-Duo group after adjusting all other variables. Trial registration ID NCT04619264 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ); November 6 2020, retrospective registration. ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04619264?term=NCT04619264&draw=2&rank=1 )https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01581-5Papacarie-DuoAtraumatic restorative techniqueMinimally invasive caries removalPregnant womenOral health related quality of lifeOHIP-14
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author May M. Adham
Mona K. El Kashlan
Wafaa E. Abdelaziz
Ahmed S. Rashad
spellingShingle May M. Adham
Mona K. El Kashlan
Wafaa E. Abdelaziz
Ahmed S. Rashad
Comparison of two minimally invasive restorative techniques in improving the oral health-related quality of life of pregnant women: a six months randomized controlled trial
BMC Oral Health
Papacarie-Duo
Atraumatic restorative technique
Minimally invasive caries removal
Pregnant women
Oral health related quality of life
OHIP-14
author_facet May M. Adham
Mona K. El Kashlan
Wafaa E. Abdelaziz
Ahmed S. Rashad
author_sort May M. Adham
title Comparison of two minimally invasive restorative techniques in improving the oral health-related quality of life of pregnant women: a six months randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of two minimally invasive restorative techniques in improving the oral health-related quality of life of pregnant women: a six months randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of two minimally invasive restorative techniques in improving the oral health-related quality of life of pregnant women: a six months randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of two minimally invasive restorative techniques in improving the oral health-related quality of life of pregnant women: a six months randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two minimally invasive restorative techniques in improving the oral health-related quality of life of pregnant women: a six months randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of two minimally invasive restorative techniques in improving the oral health-related quality of life of pregnant women: a six months randomized controlled trial
publisher BMC
series BMC Oral Health
issn 1472-6831
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Abstract Background Women tend to delay dental treatment due to misconceptions regarding the safety of dental procedures during pregnancy which may negatively affect their quality of life. Minimally invasive restorative techniques offer alternatives for caries treatment and can improve their oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) during this stage. Methods A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in 2019 and included 162 pregnant women visiting public family health centers in Alexandria, Egypt, with mild to moderate dental pain due to caries. Participants were randomly assigned into Papacarie-Duo group (n = 82) and ART group (n = 80). The outcome variable was percent change in OHRQoL (oral health impact profile, OHIP-14) after 6 months. T test/Mann Whitney U test were used to compare groups and a multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the factors affecting the outcome variable. Results A significant reduction (P < 0.002) was noted in OHIP-14 between baseline and 6 months indicating improvement in OHRQoL in the Papacarie-Duo and ART groups (16.26% and 18.91%, P = 0.120 in bivariate analysis). Multiple linear regression revealed significantly greater reduction in OHIP-14 scores in the Papacarie-Duo than the ART group (regression coefficient = 4.03, 95% confidence interval: 0.652, 7.409, P = 0.020). Conclusion Minimally invasive restorative techniques, such as ART and chemo-mechanical caries removal using Papacarie- Duo can improve the OHRQoL of pregnant women suffering from mild to moderate pain due to dental caries. Significantly more improvement was noted in the Papacarie-Duo group after adjusting all other variables. Trial registration ID NCT04619264 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ); November 6 2020, retrospective registration. ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04619264?term=NCT04619264&draw=2&rank=1 )
topic Papacarie-Duo
Atraumatic restorative technique
Minimally invasive caries removal
Pregnant women
Oral health related quality of life
OHIP-14
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01581-5
work_keys_str_mv AT maymadham comparisonoftwominimallyinvasiverestorativetechniquesinimprovingtheoralhealthrelatedqualityoflifeofpregnantwomenasixmonthsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT monakelkashlan comparisonoftwominimallyinvasiverestorativetechniquesinimprovingtheoralhealthrelatedqualityoflifeofpregnantwomenasixmonthsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wafaaeabdelaziz comparisonoftwominimallyinvasiverestorativetechniquesinimprovingtheoralhealthrelatedqualityoflifeofpregnantwomenasixmonthsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ahmedsrashad comparisonoftwominimallyinvasiverestorativetechniquesinimprovingtheoralhealthrelatedqualityoflifeofpregnantwomenasixmonthsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1721491809721384960