10. Inspiring Writing in the Sciences: An Undergraduate Electronic Journal Project

Most faculty will agree that students must learn to write well (Emerson, MacKay, MacKay, & Funnell, 2006), and in the sciences, a variety of approaches have been taken. In the College of Physical and Engineering Science at the University of Guelph, we have developed a way of embedding research,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peggy Pritchard, Dan Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2011-06-01
Series:Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching
Online Access:https://celt.uwindsor.ca/index.php/CELT/article/view/3240
id doaj-1529fc616e20439fa4926f6398242df5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1529fc616e20439fa4926f6398242df52020-11-25T03:01:38ZengUniversity of WindsorCollected Essays on Learning and Teaching2368-45262011-06-01310.22329/celt.v3i0.324010. Inspiring Writing in the Sciences: An Undergraduate Electronic Journal ProjectPeggy Pritchard0Dan Thomas1University of GuelphUniversity of GuelphMost faculty will agree that students must learn to write well (Emerson, MacKay, MacKay, & Funnell, 2006), and in the sciences, a variety of approaches have been taken. In the College of Physical and Engineering Science at the University of Guelph, we have developed a way of embedding research, writing, and analytical skills into an introductory Nanoscience course that gives students the true-to-life experience of writing for publication, ignites their imaginations, and inspires them to do their best. Following the process of scholarly publication, students become researchers, authors, and reviewers for an electronic journal. Through appropriately timed workshops and tutorials, they receive support and feedback. Rubrics for the assessment of the students’ performances as authors and peer reviewers provide them with more insight into what constitutes work that falls below expectations, or meets or exceeds them. These rubrics also enable faculty to evaluate student contributions efficiently and fairly. In this essay, we showcase a suite of pedagogical tools that includes learning activities, open access software and assessment rubrics, and share our experiences of a faculty-librarian collaboration.https://celt.uwindsor.ca/index.php/CELT/article/view/3240
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peggy Pritchard
Dan Thomas
spellingShingle Peggy Pritchard
Dan Thomas
10. Inspiring Writing in the Sciences: An Undergraduate Electronic Journal Project
Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching
author_facet Peggy Pritchard
Dan Thomas
author_sort Peggy Pritchard
title 10. Inspiring Writing in the Sciences: An Undergraduate Electronic Journal Project
title_short 10. Inspiring Writing in the Sciences: An Undergraduate Electronic Journal Project
title_full 10. Inspiring Writing in the Sciences: An Undergraduate Electronic Journal Project
title_fullStr 10. Inspiring Writing in the Sciences: An Undergraduate Electronic Journal Project
title_full_unstemmed 10. Inspiring Writing in the Sciences: An Undergraduate Electronic Journal Project
title_sort 10. inspiring writing in the sciences: an undergraduate electronic journal project
publisher University of Windsor
series Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching
issn 2368-4526
publishDate 2011-06-01
description Most faculty will agree that students must learn to write well (Emerson, MacKay, MacKay, & Funnell, 2006), and in the sciences, a variety of approaches have been taken. In the College of Physical and Engineering Science at the University of Guelph, we have developed a way of embedding research, writing, and analytical skills into an introductory Nanoscience course that gives students the true-to-life experience of writing for publication, ignites their imaginations, and inspires them to do their best. Following the process of scholarly publication, students become researchers, authors, and reviewers for an electronic journal. Through appropriately timed workshops and tutorials, they receive support and feedback. Rubrics for the assessment of the students’ performances as authors and peer reviewers provide them with more insight into what constitutes work that falls below expectations, or meets or exceeds them. These rubrics also enable faculty to evaluate student contributions efficiently and fairly. In this essay, we showcase a suite of pedagogical tools that includes learning activities, open access software and assessment rubrics, and share our experiences of a faculty-librarian collaboration.
url https://celt.uwindsor.ca/index.php/CELT/article/view/3240
work_keys_str_mv AT peggypritchard 10inspiringwritinginthesciencesanundergraduateelectronicjournalproject
AT danthomas 10inspiringwritinginthesciencesanundergraduateelectronicjournalproject
_version_ 1724692858403815424