‘Sidelight on an unwilling grey eminence – Schlosser as “Schlüsselfigur”’. A paper originally presented at the conference Viennese Art Historiography 1854-1938, University of Glasgow, 1-4 October 2009

While Riegl, Dvořák, Sedlmayr and Pächt have each of them aroused widespread enthusiasm at one point or another, the same cannot be said of Julius Schlosser (1866-1938). To speak in general terms about his intellectual trajectory and its significance, one meets two questions, the first rather obviou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karl Johns
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Art History, University of Birmingham 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Art Historiography
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2021/05/johns-doc.pdf
id doaj-15207a99f8594c998372c827873aca7d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-15207a99f8594c998372c827873aca7d2021-07-04T10:38:00ZengDepartment of Art History, University of BirminghamJournal of Art Historiography2042-47522021-06-012424KJ2doi.org/10.48352/uobxjah.00003434‘Sidelight on an unwilling grey eminence – Schlosser as “Schlüsselfigur”’. A paper originally presented at the conference Viennese Art Historiography 1854-1938, University of Glasgow, 1-4 October 2009Karl Johns0IndependentWhile Riegl, Dvořák, Sedlmayr and Pächt have each of them aroused widespread enthusiasm at one point or another, the same cannot be said of Julius Schlosser (1866-1938). To speak in general terms about his intellectual trajectory and its significance, one meets two questions, the first rather obvious, and the other quite opaque. Although he wrote and lectured in a style that was difficult, his arguments were consistent and perhaps predictable – a continuation of Wickhoff’s approach, and the principles upheld by the Institut für Geschichtsforschung, as well as something later called structure and system, which is most apparent today in his thoughts about what he called the language and grammar of art, but also in his study from 1889 of the original architectural layout of western European abbeys which is a very early example of a functional analysis. In the last decade or two of his life he seems by contrast to have made some generalizations apparently difficult to reconcile with his earlier devotion to the particularity of historical sources.https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2021/05/johns-doc.pdfjulius von schlosserinstitut für geschichtsforschungvienna school of art historiansfranz wickhoffkunstgeschichtliche anzeigenkunsthistorisches museumcimabuekunstsprachethe language of artanschluß
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karl Johns
spellingShingle Karl Johns
‘Sidelight on an unwilling grey eminence – Schlosser as “Schlüsselfigur”’. A paper originally presented at the conference Viennese Art Historiography 1854-1938, University of Glasgow, 1-4 October 2009
Journal of Art Historiography
julius von schlosser
institut für geschichtsforschung
vienna school of art historians
franz wickhoff
kunstgeschichtliche anzeigen
kunsthistorisches museum
cimabue
kunstsprache
the language of art
anschluß
author_facet Karl Johns
author_sort Karl Johns
title ‘Sidelight on an unwilling grey eminence – Schlosser as “Schlüsselfigur”’. A paper originally presented at the conference Viennese Art Historiography 1854-1938, University of Glasgow, 1-4 October 2009
title_short ‘Sidelight on an unwilling grey eminence – Schlosser as “Schlüsselfigur”’. A paper originally presented at the conference Viennese Art Historiography 1854-1938, University of Glasgow, 1-4 October 2009
title_full ‘Sidelight on an unwilling grey eminence – Schlosser as “Schlüsselfigur”’. A paper originally presented at the conference Viennese Art Historiography 1854-1938, University of Glasgow, 1-4 October 2009
title_fullStr ‘Sidelight on an unwilling grey eminence – Schlosser as “Schlüsselfigur”’. A paper originally presented at the conference Viennese Art Historiography 1854-1938, University of Glasgow, 1-4 October 2009
title_full_unstemmed ‘Sidelight on an unwilling grey eminence – Schlosser as “Schlüsselfigur”’. A paper originally presented at the conference Viennese Art Historiography 1854-1938, University of Glasgow, 1-4 October 2009
title_sort ‘sidelight on an unwilling grey eminence – schlosser as “schlüsselfigur”’. a paper originally presented at the conference viennese art historiography 1854-1938, university of glasgow, 1-4 october 2009
publisher Department of Art History, University of Birmingham
series Journal of Art Historiography
issn 2042-4752
publishDate 2021-06-01
description While Riegl, Dvořák, Sedlmayr and Pächt have each of them aroused widespread enthusiasm at one point or another, the same cannot be said of Julius Schlosser (1866-1938). To speak in general terms about his intellectual trajectory and its significance, one meets two questions, the first rather obvious, and the other quite opaque. Although he wrote and lectured in a style that was difficult, his arguments were consistent and perhaps predictable – a continuation of Wickhoff’s approach, and the principles upheld by the Institut für Geschichtsforschung, as well as something later called structure and system, which is most apparent today in his thoughts about what he called the language and grammar of art, but also in his study from 1889 of the original architectural layout of western European abbeys which is a very early example of a functional analysis. In the last decade or two of his life he seems by contrast to have made some generalizations apparently difficult to reconcile with his earlier devotion to the particularity of historical sources.
topic julius von schlosser
institut für geschichtsforschung
vienna school of art historians
franz wickhoff
kunstgeschichtliche anzeigen
kunsthistorisches museum
cimabue
kunstsprache
the language of art
anschluß
url https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2021/05/johns-doc.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT karljohns sidelightonanunwillinggreyeminenceschlosserasschlusselfigurapaperoriginallypresentedattheconferenceviennesearthistoriography18541938universityofglasgow14october2009
_version_ 1721320705998454784