The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries

Background. Cancer incidence rates vary considerably between countries and by socioeconomic status (SES). We investigate the impact of SES upon the relative cancer risk in two neighbouring countries. Methods. Data on 229,824 cases for 16 cancers diagnosed in 1995–2007 were extracted from the cancer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David W. Donnelly, Avril Hegarty, Linda Sharp, Anne-Elie Carsin, Sandra Deady, Neil McCluskey, Harry Comber, Anna Gavin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Cancer Epidemiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/612514
id doaj-151657990ccc4198b2ac1e136fffaeba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-151657990ccc4198b2ac1e136fffaeba2020-11-24T23:46:54ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Cancer Epidemiology1687-85581687-85662013-01-01201310.1155/2013/612514612514The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European CountriesDavid W. Donnelly0Avril Hegarty1Linda Sharp2Anne-Elie Carsin3Sandra Deady4Neil McCluskey5Harry Comber6Anna Gavin7Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, Mulhouse Building, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6DP, UKMACSI, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Limerick, Limerick, IrelandNational Cancer Registry, Building 6800, Cork Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Cork, IrelandCentre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, SpainNational Cancer Registry, Building 6800, Cork Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Cork, IrelandNational Cancer Registry, Building 6800, Cork Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Cork, IrelandNational Cancer Registry, Building 6800, Cork Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Cork, IrelandNorthern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, Mulhouse Building, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6DP, UKBackground. Cancer incidence rates vary considerably between countries and by socioeconomic status (SES). We investigate the impact of SES upon the relative cancer risk in two neighbouring countries. Methods. Data on 229,824 cases for 16 cancers diagnosed in 1995–2007 were extracted from the cancer registries in Northern Ireland (NI) and Republic of Ireland (RoI). Cancers in the two countries were compared using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) adjusted for age and age plus area-based SES. Results. Adjusting for SES in addition to age had a considerable impact on NI/RoI comparisons for cancers strongly related to SES. Before SES adjustment, lung cancer incidence rates were 11% higher for males and 7% higher for females in NI, while after adjustment, the IRR was not statistically significant. Cervical cancer rates were lower in NI than in RoI after adjustment for age (IRR: 0.90 (0.84–0.97)), with this difference increasing after adjustment for SES (IRR: 0.85 (0.79–0.92)). For cancers with a weak or nonexistent relationship to SES, adjustment for SES made little difference to the IRR. Conclusion. Socioeconomic factors explain some international variations but also obscure other crucial differences; thus, adjustment for these factors should not become part of international comparisons.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/612514
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David W. Donnelly
Avril Hegarty
Linda Sharp
Anne-Elie Carsin
Sandra Deady
Neil McCluskey
Harry Comber
Anna Gavin
spellingShingle David W. Donnelly
Avril Hegarty
Linda Sharp
Anne-Elie Carsin
Sandra Deady
Neil McCluskey
Harry Comber
Anna Gavin
The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries
Journal of Cancer Epidemiology
author_facet David W. Donnelly
Avril Hegarty
Linda Sharp
Anne-Elie Carsin
Sandra Deady
Neil McCluskey
Harry Comber
Anna Gavin
author_sort David W. Donnelly
title The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries
title_short The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries
title_full The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries
title_fullStr The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Comparisons of Cancer Incidence between Two European Countries
title_sort impact of adjustment for socioeconomic status on comparisons of cancer incidence between two european countries
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Cancer Epidemiology
issn 1687-8558
1687-8566
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Background. Cancer incidence rates vary considerably between countries and by socioeconomic status (SES). We investigate the impact of SES upon the relative cancer risk in two neighbouring countries. Methods. Data on 229,824 cases for 16 cancers diagnosed in 1995–2007 were extracted from the cancer registries in Northern Ireland (NI) and Republic of Ireland (RoI). Cancers in the two countries were compared using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) adjusted for age and age plus area-based SES. Results. Adjusting for SES in addition to age had a considerable impact on NI/RoI comparisons for cancers strongly related to SES. Before SES adjustment, lung cancer incidence rates were 11% higher for males and 7% higher for females in NI, while after adjustment, the IRR was not statistically significant. Cervical cancer rates were lower in NI than in RoI after adjustment for age (IRR: 0.90 (0.84–0.97)), with this difference increasing after adjustment for SES (IRR: 0.85 (0.79–0.92)). For cancers with a weak or nonexistent relationship to SES, adjustment for SES made little difference to the IRR. Conclusion. Socioeconomic factors explain some international variations but also obscure other crucial differences; thus, adjustment for these factors should not become part of international comparisons.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/612514
work_keys_str_mv AT davidwdonnelly theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT avrilhegarty theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT lindasharp theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT anneeliecarsin theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT sandradeady theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT neilmccluskey theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT harrycomber theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT annagavin theimpactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT davidwdonnelly impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT avrilhegarty impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT lindasharp impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT anneeliecarsin impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT sandradeady impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT neilmccluskey impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT harrycomber impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
AT annagavin impactofadjustmentforsocioeconomicstatusoncomparisonsofcancerincidencebetweentwoeuropeancountries
_version_ 1725491752962359296