Men and Money

Past studies suggested that sex ratio influences individuals’ economic behaviors; however, the underlying mechanism of this effect remains unclear. In the current work, we examined how sex ratio influenced women’s preference for relative gain over greater absolute gain in the context of games involv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cai Xing, Jiale Chen, Chenduo Du
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-11-01
Series:Evolutionary Psychology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916674726
id doaj-1508820193c54b199d17a2dbafd454a3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1508820193c54b199d17a2dbafd454a32020-11-25T03:16:34ZengSAGE PublishingEvolutionary Psychology1474-70492016-11-011410.1177/147470491667472610.1177_1474704916674726Men and MoneyCai Xing0Jiale Chen1Chenduo Du2 Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, ChinaPast studies suggested that sex ratio influences individuals’ economic behaviors; however, the underlying mechanism of this effect remains unclear. In the current work, we examined how sex ratio influenced women’s preference for relative gain over greater absolute gain in the context of games involving resource allocation between oneself and another woman; the role of intrasexual competition in this process was also explored. By experimentally manipulating women’s perceptions of local sex ratio, the present study found that women primed with a female-biased sex ratio (i.e., an excess of women) showed higher levels of intrasexual competition. Exposure to the cue of a scarcity of men also led women to care more about their relative gain compared with absolute gain. The effect of sex ratio on shifts of women’s preference between relative gain and absolute gain was mediated by the strength of women’s competitive attitude toward same-sex others. These findings suggest that, by altering the intensity of female–female competition, sex ratio may have a pronounced effect on women’ economic-related decisions.https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916674726
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cai Xing
Jiale Chen
Chenduo Du
spellingShingle Cai Xing
Jiale Chen
Chenduo Du
Men and Money
Evolutionary Psychology
author_facet Cai Xing
Jiale Chen
Chenduo Du
author_sort Cai Xing
title Men and Money
title_short Men and Money
title_full Men and Money
title_fullStr Men and Money
title_full_unstemmed Men and Money
title_sort men and money
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Evolutionary Psychology
issn 1474-7049
publishDate 2016-11-01
description Past studies suggested that sex ratio influences individuals’ economic behaviors; however, the underlying mechanism of this effect remains unclear. In the current work, we examined how sex ratio influenced women’s preference for relative gain over greater absolute gain in the context of games involving resource allocation between oneself and another woman; the role of intrasexual competition in this process was also explored. By experimentally manipulating women’s perceptions of local sex ratio, the present study found that women primed with a female-biased sex ratio (i.e., an excess of women) showed higher levels of intrasexual competition. Exposure to the cue of a scarcity of men also led women to care more about their relative gain compared with absolute gain. The effect of sex ratio on shifts of women’s preference between relative gain and absolute gain was mediated by the strength of women’s competitive attitude toward same-sex others. These findings suggest that, by altering the intensity of female–female competition, sex ratio may have a pronounced effect on women’ economic-related decisions.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916674726
work_keys_str_mv AT caixing menandmoney
AT jialechen menandmoney
AT chenduodu menandmoney
_version_ 1724635428457283584