Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future

Serological techniques commonly used to quantify influenza-specific antibodies include the Haemagglutination Inhibition (HI), Single Radial Haemolysis (SRH) and Virus Neutralization (VN) assays. HI and SRH are established and reproducible techniques, whereas VN is more demanding. Every new influenza...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claudia Maria Trombetta, Daniele Perini, Stuart Mather, Nigel Temperton, Emanuele Montomoli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-10-01
Series:Vaccines
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/2/4/707
id doaj-1506eced0f984ab3ab6d09d5e8e0f65f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1506eced0f984ab3ab6d09d5e8e0f65f2020-11-24T21:43:43ZengMDPI AGVaccines2076-393X2014-10-012470773410.3390/vaccines2040707vaccines2040707Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and FutureClaudia Maria Trombetta0Daniele Perini1Stuart Mather2Nigel Temperton3Emanuele Montomoli4Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Via Aldo Moro, 53100 Siena, ItalyVisMederi srl, Enterprise in Life Sciences, Via Fiorentina 1, 53100 Siena, ItalyViral Pseudotype Unit, School of Pharmacy, University of Kent, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UKViral Pseudotype Unit, School of Pharmacy, University of Kent, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UKDepartment of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Via Aldo Moro, 53100 Siena, ItalySerological techniques commonly used to quantify influenza-specific antibodies include the Haemagglutination Inhibition (HI), Single Radial Haemolysis (SRH) and Virus Neutralization (VN) assays. HI and SRH are established and reproducible techniques, whereas VN is more demanding. Every new influenza vaccine needs to fulfil the strict criteria issued by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in order to be licensed. These criteria currently apply exclusively to SRH and HI assays and refer to two different target groups—healthy adults and the elderly, but other vaccine recipient age groups have not been considered (i.e., children). The purpose of this timely review is to highlight the current scenario on correlates of protection concerning influenza vaccines and underline the need to revise the criteria and assays currently in use. In addition to SRH and HI assays, the technical advantages provided by other techniques such as the VN assay, pseudotype-based neutralization assay, neuraminidase and cell-mediated immunity assays need to be considered and regulated via EMA criteria, considering the many significant advantages that they could offer for the development of effective vaccines.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/2/4/707correlates of protectionEMA criteriaantibody titres
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Claudia Maria Trombetta
Daniele Perini
Stuart Mather
Nigel Temperton
Emanuele Montomoli
spellingShingle Claudia Maria Trombetta
Daniele Perini
Stuart Mather
Nigel Temperton
Emanuele Montomoli
Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future
Vaccines
correlates of protection
EMA criteria
antibody titres
author_facet Claudia Maria Trombetta
Daniele Perini
Stuart Mather
Nigel Temperton
Emanuele Montomoli
author_sort Claudia Maria Trombetta
title Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future
title_short Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future
title_full Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future
title_fullStr Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future
title_full_unstemmed Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future
title_sort overview of serological techniques for influenza vaccine evaluation: past, present and future
publisher MDPI AG
series Vaccines
issn 2076-393X
publishDate 2014-10-01
description Serological techniques commonly used to quantify influenza-specific antibodies include the Haemagglutination Inhibition (HI), Single Radial Haemolysis (SRH) and Virus Neutralization (VN) assays. HI and SRH are established and reproducible techniques, whereas VN is more demanding. Every new influenza vaccine needs to fulfil the strict criteria issued by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in order to be licensed. These criteria currently apply exclusively to SRH and HI assays and refer to two different target groups—healthy adults and the elderly, but other vaccine recipient age groups have not been considered (i.e., children). The purpose of this timely review is to highlight the current scenario on correlates of protection concerning influenza vaccines and underline the need to revise the criteria and assays currently in use. In addition to SRH and HI assays, the technical advantages provided by other techniques such as the VN assay, pseudotype-based neutralization assay, neuraminidase and cell-mediated immunity assays need to be considered and regulated via EMA criteria, considering the many significant advantages that they could offer for the development of effective vaccines.
topic correlates of protection
EMA criteria
antibody titres
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/2/4/707
work_keys_str_mv AT claudiamariatrombetta overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture
AT danieleperini overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture
AT stuartmather overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture
AT nigeltemperton overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture
AT emanuelemontomoli overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture
_version_ 1725912340952514560