Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future
Serological techniques commonly used to quantify influenza-specific antibodies include the Haemagglutination Inhibition (HI), Single Radial Haemolysis (SRH) and Virus Neutralization (VN) assays. HI and SRH are established and reproducible techniques, whereas VN is more demanding. Every new influenza...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2014-10-01
|
Series: | Vaccines |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/2/4/707 |
id |
doaj-1506eced0f984ab3ab6d09d5e8e0f65f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1506eced0f984ab3ab6d09d5e8e0f65f2020-11-24T21:43:43ZengMDPI AGVaccines2076-393X2014-10-012470773410.3390/vaccines2040707vaccines2040707Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and FutureClaudia Maria Trombetta0Daniele Perini1Stuart Mather2Nigel Temperton3Emanuele Montomoli4Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Via Aldo Moro, 53100 Siena, ItalyVisMederi srl, Enterprise in Life Sciences, Via Fiorentina 1, 53100 Siena, ItalyViral Pseudotype Unit, School of Pharmacy, University of Kent, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UKViral Pseudotype Unit, School of Pharmacy, University of Kent, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UKDepartment of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Via Aldo Moro, 53100 Siena, ItalySerological techniques commonly used to quantify influenza-specific antibodies include the Haemagglutination Inhibition (HI), Single Radial Haemolysis (SRH) and Virus Neutralization (VN) assays. HI and SRH are established and reproducible techniques, whereas VN is more demanding. Every new influenza vaccine needs to fulfil the strict criteria issued by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in order to be licensed. These criteria currently apply exclusively to SRH and HI assays and refer to two different target groups—healthy adults and the elderly, but other vaccine recipient age groups have not been considered (i.e., children). The purpose of this timely review is to highlight the current scenario on correlates of protection concerning influenza vaccines and underline the need to revise the criteria and assays currently in use. In addition to SRH and HI assays, the technical advantages provided by other techniques such as the VN assay, pseudotype-based neutralization assay, neuraminidase and cell-mediated immunity assays need to be considered and regulated via EMA criteria, considering the many significant advantages that they could offer for the development of effective vaccines.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/2/4/707correlates of protectionEMA criteriaantibody titres |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Claudia Maria Trombetta Daniele Perini Stuart Mather Nigel Temperton Emanuele Montomoli |
spellingShingle |
Claudia Maria Trombetta Daniele Perini Stuart Mather Nigel Temperton Emanuele Montomoli Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future Vaccines correlates of protection EMA criteria antibody titres |
author_facet |
Claudia Maria Trombetta Daniele Perini Stuart Mather Nigel Temperton Emanuele Montomoli |
author_sort |
Claudia Maria Trombetta |
title |
Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future |
title_short |
Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future |
title_full |
Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future |
title_fullStr |
Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future |
title_full_unstemmed |
Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future |
title_sort |
overview of serological techniques for influenza vaccine evaluation: past, present and future |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Vaccines |
issn |
2076-393X |
publishDate |
2014-10-01 |
description |
Serological techniques commonly used to quantify influenza-specific antibodies include the Haemagglutination Inhibition (HI), Single Radial Haemolysis (SRH) and Virus Neutralization (VN) assays. HI and SRH are established and reproducible techniques, whereas VN is more demanding. Every new influenza vaccine needs to fulfil the strict criteria issued by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in order to be licensed. These criteria currently apply exclusively to SRH and HI assays and refer to two different target groups—healthy adults and the elderly, but other vaccine recipient age groups have not been considered (i.e., children). The purpose of this timely review is to highlight the current scenario on correlates of protection concerning influenza vaccines and underline the need to revise the criteria and assays currently in use. In addition to SRH and HI assays, the technical advantages provided by other techniques such as the VN assay, pseudotype-based neutralization assay, neuraminidase and cell-mediated immunity assays need to be considered and regulated via EMA criteria, considering the many significant advantages that they could offer for the development of effective vaccines. |
topic |
correlates of protection EMA criteria antibody titres |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/2/4/707 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT claudiamariatrombetta overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture AT danieleperini overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture AT stuartmather overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture AT nigeltemperton overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture AT emanuelemontomoli overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture |
_version_ |
1725912340952514560 |