Response to Johnson: A random sample versus the radical event
Timothy Johnson’s working hypothesis in his review of my latest book, The Medium of Contingency, is that I (as well as the ‘quants’ involved in the derivative pricing industry) do not understand the foundations of abstract probability theory. In this response, I show that this is not the case. On th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Edinburgh
2016-12-01
|
| Series: | Finance and Society |
| Online Access: | http://financeandsociety.ed.ac.uk/article/view/1734 |