¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX)

This paper proposes that the use of the bow and arrow and boleadoras (stone throwers) as a weapon system was simultaneously employed —in different environments— by the Aonikenk hunter-gatherer groups in the post 1520 AD period, which is different from the hypothesis found in previous historical-ethn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: María José Saletta, Mariana Sacchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de los Andes 2019-01-01
Series:Revista de Estudios Sociales
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/res67.2019.08
id doaj-14faea5c655440288fc7dbf1e4db672c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14faea5c655440288fc7dbf1e4db672c2020-11-25T01:48:29ZengUniversidad de los AndesRevista de Estudios Sociales0123-885X1900-51802019-01-016710111410.7440/res67.2019.08¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX)María José Saletta0Mariana Sacchi1Universidad Nacional de La Matanza (Argentina)Universidad Nacional de La Matanza (Argentina)This paper proposes that the use of the bow and arrow and boleadoras (stone throwers) as a weapon system was simultaneously employed —in different environments— by the Aonikenk hunter-gatherer groups in the post 1520 AD period, which is different from the hypothesis found in previous historical-ethnographic studies. To test our hypothesis and due to the scarcity of stone balls in the stratigraphic excavations, we chose an analysis of the frequency of projectile points, end-scrapers and side-scrapers found in 38 post-contact sites. These three types of artefacts presented different frequencies, which may be associated with the different functions of the respective sites (limited activities vs. multiple activities). This analysis, together with the topography of the sites, allowed us to confirm our initial hypothesis, showing the usefulness of a regional approach to the analysis of post-Contact archaeology.https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/res67.2019.08Author: post-contactprojectile pointssouthern Patagoniaweapons systems
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author María José Saletta
Mariana Sacchi
spellingShingle María José Saletta
Mariana Sacchi
¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX)
Revista de Estudios Sociales
Author: post-contact
projectile points
southern Patagonia
weapons systems
author_facet María José Saletta
Mariana Sacchi
author_sort María José Saletta
title ¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX)
title_short ¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX)
title_full ¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX)
title_fullStr ¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX)
title_full_unstemmed ¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX)
title_sort ¿ausencias o abandonos? las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de patagonia meridional (siglos xvi al xx)
publisher Universidad de los Andes
series Revista de Estudios Sociales
issn 0123-885X
1900-5180
publishDate 2019-01-01
description This paper proposes that the use of the bow and arrow and boleadoras (stone throwers) as a weapon system was simultaneously employed —in different environments— by the Aonikenk hunter-gatherer groups in the post 1520 AD period, which is different from the hypothesis found in previous historical-ethnographic studies. To test our hypothesis and due to the scarcity of stone balls in the stratigraphic excavations, we chose an analysis of the frequency of projectile points, end-scrapers and side-scrapers found in 38 post-contact sites. These three types of artefacts presented different frequencies, which may be associated with the different functions of the respective sites (limited activities vs. multiple activities). This analysis, together with the topography of the sites, allowed us to confirm our initial hypothesis, showing the usefulness of a regional approach to the analysis of post-Contact archaeology.
topic Author: post-contact
projectile points
southern Patagonia
weapons systems
url https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/res67.2019.08
work_keys_str_mv AT mariajosesaletta ausenciasoabandonoslaspuntasdeproyectilensitiospostcontactodepatagoniameridionalsiglosxvialxx
AT marianasacchi ausenciasoabandonoslaspuntasdeproyectilensitiospostcontactodepatagoniameridionalsiglosxvialxx
_version_ 1725011955744243712