¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX)
This paper proposes that the use of the bow and arrow and boleadoras (stone throwers) as a weapon system was simultaneously employed —in different environments— by the Aonikenk hunter-gatherer groups in the post 1520 AD period, which is different from the hypothesis found in previous historical-ethn...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad de los Andes
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Revista de Estudios Sociales |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/res67.2019.08 |
id |
doaj-14faea5c655440288fc7dbf1e4db672c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-14faea5c655440288fc7dbf1e4db672c2020-11-25T01:48:29ZengUniversidad de los AndesRevista de Estudios Sociales0123-885X1900-51802019-01-016710111410.7440/res67.2019.08¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX)María José Saletta0Mariana Sacchi1Universidad Nacional de La Matanza (Argentina)Universidad Nacional de La Matanza (Argentina)This paper proposes that the use of the bow and arrow and boleadoras (stone throwers) as a weapon system was simultaneously employed —in different environments— by the Aonikenk hunter-gatherer groups in the post 1520 AD period, which is different from the hypothesis found in previous historical-ethnographic studies. To test our hypothesis and due to the scarcity of stone balls in the stratigraphic excavations, we chose an analysis of the frequency of projectile points, end-scrapers and side-scrapers found in 38 post-contact sites. These three types of artefacts presented different frequencies, which may be associated with the different functions of the respective sites (limited activities vs. multiple activities). This analysis, together with the topography of the sites, allowed us to confirm our initial hypothesis, showing the usefulness of a regional approach to the analysis of post-Contact archaeology.https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/res67.2019.08Author: post-contactprojectile pointssouthern Patagoniaweapons systems |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
María José Saletta Mariana Sacchi |
spellingShingle |
María José Saletta Mariana Sacchi ¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX) Revista de Estudios Sociales Author: post-contact projectile points southern Patagonia weapons systems |
author_facet |
María José Saletta Mariana Sacchi |
author_sort |
María José Saletta |
title |
¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX) |
title_short |
¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX) |
title_full |
¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX) |
title_fullStr |
¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX) |
title_full_unstemmed |
¿Ausencias o abandonos? Las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de Patagonia meridional (siglos XVI al XX) |
title_sort |
¿ausencias o abandonos? las puntas de proyectil en sitios postcontacto de patagonia meridional (siglos xvi al xx) |
publisher |
Universidad de los Andes |
series |
Revista de Estudios Sociales |
issn |
0123-885X 1900-5180 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
This paper proposes that the use of the bow and arrow and boleadoras (stone throwers) as a weapon system was simultaneously employed —in different environments— by the Aonikenk hunter-gatherer groups in the post 1520 AD period, which is different from the hypothesis found in previous historical-ethnographic studies. To test our hypothesis and due to the scarcity of stone balls in the stratigraphic excavations, we chose an analysis of the frequency of projectile points, end-scrapers and side-scrapers found in 38 post-contact sites. These three types of artefacts presented different frequencies, which may be associated with the different functions of the respective sites (limited activities vs. multiple activities). This analysis, together with the topography of the sites, allowed us to confirm our initial hypothesis, showing the usefulness of a regional approach to the analysis of post-Contact archaeology. |
topic |
Author: post-contact projectile points southern Patagonia weapons systems |
url |
https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/res67.2019.08 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariajosesaletta ausenciasoabandonoslaspuntasdeproyectilensitiospostcontactodepatagoniameridionalsiglosxvialxx AT marianasacchi ausenciasoabandonoslaspuntasdeproyectilensitiospostcontactodepatagoniameridionalsiglosxvialxx |
_version_ |
1725011955744243712 |