California forest policy must bend toward the new social order
The template for California's forest policies emerged at the beginning of the 20th century, a time of increasing federal power, global expansion and hard social distinctions. Of the state's 2 million or so people, few were eligible to vote and fewer still were in...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources
2000-03-01
|
| Series: | California Agriculture |
| Online Access: | http://calag.ucanr.edu/archive/?article=ca.v054n02p35 |
| Summary: | The template for California's forest policies emerged at the beginning of the 20th
century, a time of increasing federal power, global expansion and hard social distinctions.
Of the state's 2 million or so people, few were eligible to vote and fewer still were
interested in forests. Forest policy was the arena of a relatively small group. Today
a similar, relatively small group controls California forests, but the political base
for their control is eroding. California's diverse and democratic society of 35 million
people no longer conforms to the wishes of any forest elite, be it scientific, governmental,
industrial or environmental. Yet the state's forest elites continue to arm-wrestle
as though the old social structure still held. California citizens, meanwhile, have
organized hundreds of watershed groups in neighborhoods and communities statewide,
supporting goals such as salmon recovery, urban access and local economic opportunity.
These actions represent a massive spontaneous change in political culture. The simple
choices of 25 or 50 years ago, of preservation versus use, public versus private,
no longer encompass the interests of California's population. By 2025, a highly diversified
landscape of forest institutions, management techniques and ecological conditions
will soften current jurisdictional distinctions. The people who come to the table
to discuss forest policy will no longer be just the elites who shaped forest policy
in the 20th century. Whether we are better off or not will depend on how aggressively
the state pursues the innovations necessary to sustain cohesive and resilient forest
systems serving larger public interests. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0008-0845 2160-8091 |