Evaluating financial education initiatives in South Africa: The importance of multiple evaluation approaches

Background: Given the low levels of financial literacy in South Africa, financial education projects have a significant role to play in reducing some of the demand side barriers to financial inclusion. Measuring the impact of a financial education project is important to assess whether the project a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily Massey, Alyna Wyatt, Caitlin Smit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2016-06-01
Series:African Evaluation Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/125
id doaj-14e6b721ee4f473f96320d5ef6a6b5b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14e6b721ee4f473f96320d5ef6a6b5b82020-11-25T00:59:07ZengAOSISAfrican Evaluation Journal2310-49882306-51332016-06-0141e1e610.4102/aej.v4i1.12556Evaluating financial education initiatives in South Africa: The importance of multiple evaluation approachesEmily Massey0Alyna Wyatt1Caitlin Smit2Genesis AnalyticsGenesis AnalyticsGenesis AnalyticsBackground: Given the low levels of financial literacy in South Africa, financial education projects have a significant role to play in reducing some of the demand side barriers to financial inclusion. Measuring the impact of a financial education project is important to assess whether the project achieves its ultimate objectives, for justifying scaling up and for policy design. However, impact evaluations alone are not sufficient in describing the success or failure of a project. Objectives: This study aims to show that, particularly in a South African context, where investment in financial education interventions is mandated by the Financial Sector Codes, impact should not be the only criterion assessed when evaluating financial education projects. Research method and design: This study was informed by a literature review, a synthesis of team experience on a range of financial education projects in South Africa and the development of case studies. Results: Describing the success or failure of a project needs to go beyond impact and explore factors such as project relevance, design and quality. In order to verify these other factors, different types of evaluations are necessary at the various stages of the project’s life-cycle. Conclusion: Expanding the learning objective beyond the exclusive identification of whether financial behaviour was achieved is particularly important where financial education projects, and the monitoring and evaluation thereof, is mandated. In the African context, where resources are scarce, money for monitoring and evaluation should be selectively channelled into determining project relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and then only impact.https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/125Not provided.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emily Massey
Alyna Wyatt
Caitlin Smit
spellingShingle Emily Massey
Alyna Wyatt
Caitlin Smit
Evaluating financial education initiatives in South Africa: The importance of multiple evaluation approaches
African Evaluation Journal
Not provided.
author_facet Emily Massey
Alyna Wyatt
Caitlin Smit
author_sort Emily Massey
title Evaluating financial education initiatives in South Africa: The importance of multiple evaluation approaches
title_short Evaluating financial education initiatives in South Africa: The importance of multiple evaluation approaches
title_full Evaluating financial education initiatives in South Africa: The importance of multiple evaluation approaches
title_fullStr Evaluating financial education initiatives in South Africa: The importance of multiple evaluation approaches
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating financial education initiatives in South Africa: The importance of multiple evaluation approaches
title_sort evaluating financial education initiatives in south africa: the importance of multiple evaluation approaches
publisher AOSIS
series African Evaluation Journal
issn 2310-4988
2306-5133
publishDate 2016-06-01
description Background: Given the low levels of financial literacy in South Africa, financial education projects have a significant role to play in reducing some of the demand side barriers to financial inclusion. Measuring the impact of a financial education project is important to assess whether the project achieves its ultimate objectives, for justifying scaling up and for policy design. However, impact evaluations alone are not sufficient in describing the success or failure of a project. Objectives: This study aims to show that, particularly in a South African context, where investment in financial education interventions is mandated by the Financial Sector Codes, impact should not be the only criterion assessed when evaluating financial education projects. Research method and design: This study was informed by a literature review, a synthesis of team experience on a range of financial education projects in South Africa and the development of case studies. Results: Describing the success or failure of a project needs to go beyond impact and explore factors such as project relevance, design and quality. In order to verify these other factors, different types of evaluations are necessary at the various stages of the project’s life-cycle. Conclusion: Expanding the learning objective beyond the exclusive identification of whether financial behaviour was achieved is particularly important where financial education projects, and the monitoring and evaluation thereof, is mandated. In the African context, where resources are scarce, money for monitoring and evaluation should be selectively channelled into determining project relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and then only impact.
topic Not provided.
url https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/125
work_keys_str_mv AT emilymassey evaluatingfinancialeducationinitiativesinsouthafricatheimportanceofmultipleevaluationapproaches
AT alynawyatt evaluatingfinancialeducationinitiativesinsouthafricatheimportanceofmultipleevaluationapproaches
AT caitlinsmit evaluatingfinancialeducationinitiativesinsouthafricatheimportanceofmultipleevaluationapproaches
_version_ 1725218739317637120