Catastrophic failure of a dual mobility bearing in a revision total hip arthroplasty

The following case demonstrates an example of a catastrophic failure of a dual mobility (DM) bearing used in the setting of a revision total hip arthroplasty for an acetabular component with an excessive abduction angle. Currently, in the literature, it has been demonstrated that DM bearings have de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brett G. Brazier, BA, Ethan R. Wren, DO, Michael J. Blackmer, DO, Dominic V. Marino, DO, Jason M. Cochran, DO
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-09-01
Series:Arthroplasty Today
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344118300426
id doaj-14dd590fbb9c4195b11adf9cfa59ba91
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14dd590fbb9c4195b11adf9cfa59ba912020-11-25T02:47:49ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412018-09-0143275278Catastrophic failure of a dual mobility bearing in a revision total hip arthroplastyBrett G. Brazier, BA0Ethan R. Wren, DO1Michael J. Blackmer, DO2Dominic V. Marino, DO3Jason M. Cochran, DO4College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Corresponding author. 4185 Cornell Road, Okemos, MI 48874, USA. Tel.: +1 517 347 3735.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, McLaren Greater Lansing Hospital, Sparrow Hospital, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USAThe following case demonstrates an example of a catastrophic failure of a dual mobility (DM) bearing used in the setting of a revision total hip arthroplasty for an acetabular component with an excessive abduction angle. Currently, in the literature, it has been demonstrated that DM bearings have decreased polyethylene wear at abduction angles up to 65°; however, this has only been shown in in vitro studies. To our knowledge, there have been no reports of in vivo DM bearings that have demonstrated these same results. In this case, a DM bearing was used in a revision surgery with a retained acetabular component that had an abduction angle of approximately 70°-75° which ultimately led to catastrophic polyethylene failure. Keywords: Dual mobility bearing, Polyethylene wear, Revision total hip arthroplasty, Increased abduction anglehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344118300426
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brett G. Brazier, BA
Ethan R. Wren, DO
Michael J. Blackmer, DO
Dominic V. Marino, DO
Jason M. Cochran, DO
spellingShingle Brett G. Brazier, BA
Ethan R. Wren, DO
Michael J. Blackmer, DO
Dominic V. Marino, DO
Jason M. Cochran, DO
Catastrophic failure of a dual mobility bearing in a revision total hip arthroplasty
Arthroplasty Today
author_facet Brett G. Brazier, BA
Ethan R. Wren, DO
Michael J. Blackmer, DO
Dominic V. Marino, DO
Jason M. Cochran, DO
author_sort Brett G. Brazier, BA
title Catastrophic failure of a dual mobility bearing in a revision total hip arthroplasty
title_short Catastrophic failure of a dual mobility bearing in a revision total hip arthroplasty
title_full Catastrophic failure of a dual mobility bearing in a revision total hip arthroplasty
title_fullStr Catastrophic failure of a dual mobility bearing in a revision total hip arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Catastrophic failure of a dual mobility bearing in a revision total hip arthroplasty
title_sort catastrophic failure of a dual mobility bearing in a revision total hip arthroplasty
publisher Elsevier
series Arthroplasty Today
issn 2352-3441
publishDate 2018-09-01
description The following case demonstrates an example of a catastrophic failure of a dual mobility (DM) bearing used in the setting of a revision total hip arthroplasty for an acetabular component with an excessive abduction angle. Currently, in the literature, it has been demonstrated that DM bearings have decreased polyethylene wear at abduction angles up to 65°; however, this has only been shown in in vitro studies. To our knowledge, there have been no reports of in vivo DM bearings that have demonstrated these same results. In this case, a DM bearing was used in a revision surgery with a retained acetabular component that had an abduction angle of approximately 70°-75° which ultimately led to catastrophic polyethylene failure. Keywords: Dual mobility bearing, Polyethylene wear, Revision total hip arthroplasty, Increased abduction angle
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344118300426
work_keys_str_mv AT brettgbrazierba catastrophicfailureofadualmobilitybearinginarevisiontotalhiparthroplasty
AT ethanrwrendo catastrophicfailureofadualmobilitybearinginarevisiontotalhiparthroplasty
AT michaeljblackmerdo catastrophicfailureofadualmobilitybearinginarevisiontotalhiparthroplasty
AT dominicvmarinodo catastrophicfailureofadualmobilitybearinginarevisiontotalhiparthroplasty
AT jasonmcochrando catastrophicfailureofadualmobilitybearinginarevisiontotalhiparthroplasty
_version_ 1724751120755064832