Critical Thinking Analysis of 13-14 Years Old Students on Lens Refraction Material
This research aims to analyze HOTS-based science learning in terms of students' critical thinking skills. This research was conducted at SMPN 22 Jambi City using a mixed research method with explanatory design analysis. Two instruments were made in this research: the description test questions...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Indonesian |
Published: |
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/al-biruni/article/view/7119 |
id |
doaj-14d0e629a4654280a3487ce8983474cc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-14d0e629a4654280a3487ce8983474cc2021-09-15T04:34:07ZindInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Raden Intan LampungJurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni2303-18322503-023X2021-05-0110114915710.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i1.71193892Critical Thinking Analysis of 13-14 Years Old Students on Lens Refraction MaterialTanti Tanti0Darmaji Darmaji1Astalini Astalini2Dwi Agus Kurniawan3Lia Kartina4Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Thaha Saifuddin JambiJambi UniversityJambi UniversityJambi UniversityJambi UniversityThis research aims to analyze HOTS-based science learning in terms of students' critical thinking skills. This research was conducted at SMPN 22 Jambi City using a mixed research method with explanatory design analysis. Two instruments were made in this research: the description test questions as an instrument for quantitative approach and interviews for qualitative approach. The research subjects consisted of 58 of 13-14 years old students selected using quota sampling. The tested topic was the lens refraction which consisted of 10 questions. Five indicators were tested; namely, the ability to provide basic explanation, basic support, interference, advanced clarification, and strategy and tactics. After analyzing students' answers, the average score for providing basic explanation was 3.31, building basic supports was 3.59, inferencing was 3.26, providing advanced explanation was 3.88, and utilizing strategies and tactics was 3.41. Students’ HOTS was high with the average scores in the 40-60 interval. Therefore, students’ critical thinking skills were sufficient, which affected students’ HOTS in science learning.http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/al-biruni/article/view/7119critical thinkinghotsnatural sciences |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Indonesian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tanti Tanti Darmaji Darmaji Astalini Astalini Dwi Agus Kurniawan Lia Kartina |
spellingShingle |
Tanti Tanti Darmaji Darmaji Astalini Astalini Dwi Agus Kurniawan Lia Kartina Critical Thinking Analysis of 13-14 Years Old Students on Lens Refraction Material Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni critical thinking hots natural sciences |
author_facet |
Tanti Tanti Darmaji Darmaji Astalini Astalini Dwi Agus Kurniawan Lia Kartina |
author_sort |
Tanti Tanti |
title |
Critical Thinking Analysis of 13-14 Years Old Students on Lens Refraction Material |
title_short |
Critical Thinking Analysis of 13-14 Years Old Students on Lens Refraction Material |
title_full |
Critical Thinking Analysis of 13-14 Years Old Students on Lens Refraction Material |
title_fullStr |
Critical Thinking Analysis of 13-14 Years Old Students on Lens Refraction Material |
title_full_unstemmed |
Critical Thinking Analysis of 13-14 Years Old Students on Lens Refraction Material |
title_sort |
critical thinking analysis of 13-14 years old students on lens refraction material |
publisher |
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung |
series |
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni |
issn |
2303-1832 2503-023X |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
This research aims to analyze HOTS-based science learning in terms of students' critical thinking skills. This research was conducted at SMPN 22 Jambi City using a mixed research method with explanatory design analysis. Two instruments were made in this research: the description test questions as an instrument for quantitative approach and interviews for qualitative approach. The research subjects consisted of 58 of 13-14 years old students selected using quota sampling. The tested topic was the lens refraction which consisted of 10 questions. Five indicators were tested; namely, the ability to provide basic explanation, basic support, interference, advanced clarification, and strategy and tactics. After analyzing students' answers, the average score for providing basic explanation was 3.31, building basic supports was 3.59, inferencing was 3.26, providing advanced explanation was 3.88, and utilizing strategies and tactics was 3.41. Students’ HOTS was high with the average scores in the 40-60 interval. Therefore, students’ critical thinking skills were sufficient, which affected students’ HOTS in science learning. |
topic |
critical thinking hots natural sciences |
url |
http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/al-biruni/article/view/7119 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tantitanti criticalthinkinganalysisof1314yearsoldstudentsonlensrefractionmaterial AT darmajidarmaji criticalthinkinganalysisof1314yearsoldstudentsonlensrefractionmaterial AT astaliniastalini criticalthinkinganalysisof1314yearsoldstudentsonlensrefractionmaterial AT dwiaguskurniawan criticalthinkinganalysisof1314yearsoldstudentsonlensrefractionmaterial AT liakartina criticalthinkinganalysisof1314yearsoldstudentsonlensrefractionmaterial |
_version_ |
1717379291481636864 |