Differences in Science American College Testing Scores between Traditional and Alternative Science Sequences

To examine differences between sequences of secondary science courses on achievement on science high stakes exams, a purposive quantitative research design was utilized in this study. A short survey was sent out to public high schools in the state of Missouri that asked to identify their main scie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dr. John Gilbert, James Concannon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ICASE 2020-12-01
Series:Science Education International
Subjects:
id doaj-14cc4b6b34a9420c8b5d849acc0802f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14cc4b6b34a9420c8b5d849acc0802f42021-01-26T01:06:36ZengICASEScience Education International2077-23272020-12-0131442543010.33828/sei.v31.i4.12Differences in Science American College Testing Scores between Traditional and Alternative Science Sequences Dr. John Gilbert 0James Concannon 1 Principal, Rich Hill, Missouri, USA Director for the School of Education and Program Manager for STEM Education, William Woods University, Fulton, Missouri, USA To examine differences between sequences of secondary science courses on achievement on science high stakes exams, a purposive quantitative research design was utilized in this study. A short survey was sent out to public high schools in the state of Missouri that asked to identify their main science course sequence. In addition, participants were asked to indicate if they had altered their science course sequence between the years of 2012 and 2017. This data were compared to their average building science American College Testing (ACT) score for the 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 school years in which all 16–17-year-olds in the state were required to take the exam. The analysis of the results found no connection between science course sequence and performance on the science section of the ACT for either year. In addition, it was found that schools that indicated that they altered their science course sequence had no difference in performance on the science portion of the ACT. Further research is needed to determine if there are any benefits to altering a science course sequence. secondary scienceteaching sequencequantitative analysislongitudinal study
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dr. John Gilbert
James Concannon
spellingShingle Dr. John Gilbert
James Concannon
Differences in Science American College Testing Scores between Traditional and Alternative Science Sequences
Science Education International
secondary science
teaching sequence
quantitative analysis
longitudinal study
author_facet Dr. John Gilbert
James Concannon
author_sort Dr. John Gilbert
title Differences in Science American College Testing Scores between Traditional and Alternative Science Sequences
title_short Differences in Science American College Testing Scores between Traditional and Alternative Science Sequences
title_full Differences in Science American College Testing Scores between Traditional and Alternative Science Sequences
title_fullStr Differences in Science American College Testing Scores between Traditional and Alternative Science Sequences
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Science American College Testing Scores between Traditional and Alternative Science Sequences
title_sort differences in science american college testing scores between traditional and alternative science sequences
publisher ICASE
series Science Education International
issn 2077-2327
publishDate 2020-12-01
description To examine differences between sequences of secondary science courses on achievement on science high stakes exams, a purposive quantitative research design was utilized in this study. A short survey was sent out to public high schools in the state of Missouri that asked to identify their main science course sequence. In addition, participants were asked to indicate if they had altered their science course sequence between the years of 2012 and 2017. This data were compared to their average building science American College Testing (ACT) score for the 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 school years in which all 16–17-year-olds in the state were required to take the exam. The analysis of the results found no connection between science course sequence and performance on the science section of the ACT for either year. In addition, it was found that schools that indicated that they altered their science course sequence had no difference in performance on the science portion of the ACT. Further research is needed to determine if there are any benefits to altering a science course sequence.
topic secondary science
teaching sequence
quantitative analysis
longitudinal study
work_keys_str_mv AT drjohngilbert differencesinscienceamericancollegetestingscoresbetweentraditionalandalternativesciencesequences
AT jamesconcannon differencesinscienceamericancollegetestingscoresbetweentraditionalandalternativesciencesequences
_version_ 1724323424521682944