Animal Ethics and Politics Beyond the Social Contract

This paper is divided into three sections. First, I describe the wide plurality of views on issues of animal ethics, showing that our disagreements here are deep and profound. This fact of reasonable pluralism about animal ethics presents a political problem. According to the dominant liberal tradit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alan Reynolds
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université de Montréal 2014-09-01
Series:Les Ateliers de l’Ethique
Subjects:
Online Access:http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1029066ar
id doaj-14c6e652c73e45a38ac71f428b83b48a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14c6e652c73e45a38ac71f428b83b48a2020-11-24T22:01:51ZengUniversité de MontréalLes Ateliers de l’Ethique1718-99771718-99772014-09-0193208222http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1029066arAnimal Ethics and Politics Beyond the Social ContractAlan Reynolds0University of OregonThis paper is divided into three sections. First, I describe the wide plurality of views on issues of animal ethics, showing that our disagreements here are deep and profound. This fact of reasonable pluralism about animal ethics presents a political problem. According to the dominant liberal tradition of political philosophy, it is impermissible for one faction of people to impose its values upon another faction of people who reasonably reject those values. Instead, we are obligated to justify our political actions to each other using reasons that everyone can accept. Thus, in the second section I suggest that our condition of reasonable pluralism inspires us to turn toward some form of contractarianism. The social contract tradition emerged precisely as an attempt to think about how a society characterized by deep moral disagreement could nonetheless agree about the basic principles of justice. I will show, in this section, that although the social contract tradition would seem to contain the best tools for thinking about how to deal with moral disagreement, it fails to help us think through the important issues of animal ethics. In the concluding section, I suggest some ways in which political philosophy might move beyond contractarianism when thinking about this issue, including embracing an agonistic style of politics.http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1029066aranimal ethicssocial contract theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alan Reynolds
spellingShingle Alan Reynolds
Animal Ethics and Politics Beyond the Social Contract
Les Ateliers de l’Ethique
animal ethics
social contract theory
author_facet Alan Reynolds
author_sort Alan Reynolds
title Animal Ethics and Politics Beyond the Social Contract
title_short Animal Ethics and Politics Beyond the Social Contract
title_full Animal Ethics and Politics Beyond the Social Contract
title_fullStr Animal Ethics and Politics Beyond the Social Contract
title_full_unstemmed Animal Ethics and Politics Beyond the Social Contract
title_sort animal ethics and politics beyond the social contract
publisher Université de Montréal
series Les Ateliers de l’Ethique
issn 1718-9977
1718-9977
publishDate 2014-09-01
description This paper is divided into three sections. First, I describe the wide plurality of views on issues of animal ethics, showing that our disagreements here are deep and profound. This fact of reasonable pluralism about animal ethics presents a political problem. According to the dominant liberal tradition of political philosophy, it is impermissible for one faction of people to impose its values upon another faction of people who reasonably reject those values. Instead, we are obligated to justify our political actions to each other using reasons that everyone can accept. Thus, in the second section I suggest that our condition of reasonable pluralism inspires us to turn toward some form of contractarianism. The social contract tradition emerged precisely as an attempt to think about how a society characterized by deep moral disagreement could nonetheless agree about the basic principles of justice. I will show, in this section, that although the social contract tradition would seem to contain the best tools for thinking about how to deal with moral disagreement, it fails to help us think through the important issues of animal ethics. In the concluding section, I suggest some ways in which political philosophy might move beyond contractarianism when thinking about this issue, including embracing an agonistic style of politics.
topic animal ethics
social contract theory
url http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1029066ar
work_keys_str_mv AT alanreynolds animalethicsandpoliticsbeyondthesocialcontract
_version_ 1725838180750458880