FDA Experience with Medical Countermeasures under the Animal Rule
The Food and Drug Administration issued a final rule in May 2002 to permit the Agency to approve drugs or license biological products on the basis of animal efficacy studies for use in ameliorating or preventing serious or life-threatening conditions caused by exposure to lethal or permanently disab...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Advances in Preventive Medicine |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/507571 |
id |
doaj-14c3841c0e9a46e49fea475f373065ff |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-14c3841c0e9a46e49fea475f373065ff2020-11-24T21:11:46ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Preventive Medicine2090-34802090-34992012-01-01201210.1155/2012/507571507571FDA Experience with Medical Countermeasures under the Animal RulePaul Aebersold0Global Regulatory Affairs, Quintiles, Inc., 1801 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, USAThe Food and Drug Administration issued a final rule in May 2002 to permit the Agency to approve drugs or license biological products on the basis of animal efficacy studies for use in ameliorating or preventing serious or life-threatening conditions caused by exposure to lethal or permanently disabling toxic biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear substances. Only two drugs were approved in the first nine years of the “Animal Rule” despite massive investment by the federal government since 2001 to stimulate development of medical countermeasures to biological threats. This article therefore examines the Food and Drug Administration reviews made public after approval of those two drugs and the public discussion at the Agency's Anti-Infective Drugs Advisory Committee of one biological product under development under the Animal Rule. Despite the paucity of approved drugs or licensed biological products as medical countermeasures, several investigational drugs have been placed in the National Strategic Stockpile for use as medical countermeasures, if needed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/507571 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Paul Aebersold |
spellingShingle |
Paul Aebersold FDA Experience with Medical Countermeasures under the Animal Rule Advances in Preventive Medicine |
author_facet |
Paul Aebersold |
author_sort |
Paul Aebersold |
title |
FDA Experience with Medical Countermeasures under the Animal Rule |
title_short |
FDA Experience with Medical Countermeasures under the Animal Rule |
title_full |
FDA Experience with Medical Countermeasures under the Animal Rule |
title_fullStr |
FDA Experience with Medical Countermeasures under the Animal Rule |
title_full_unstemmed |
FDA Experience with Medical Countermeasures under the Animal Rule |
title_sort |
fda experience with medical countermeasures under the animal rule |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Advances in Preventive Medicine |
issn |
2090-3480 2090-3499 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
The Food and Drug Administration issued a final rule in May 2002 to permit the Agency to approve drugs or license biological products on the basis of animal efficacy studies for use in ameliorating or preventing serious or life-threatening conditions caused by exposure to lethal or permanently disabling toxic biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear substances. Only two drugs were approved in the first nine years of the “Animal Rule” despite massive investment by the federal government since 2001 to stimulate development of medical countermeasures to biological threats. This article therefore examines the Food and Drug Administration reviews made public after approval of those two drugs and the public discussion at the Agency's Anti-Infective Drugs Advisory Committee of one biological product under development under the Animal Rule. Despite the paucity of approved drugs or licensed biological products as medical countermeasures, several investigational drugs have been placed in the National Strategic Stockpile for use as medical countermeasures, if needed. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/507571 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paulaebersold fdaexperiencewithmedicalcountermeasuresundertheanimalrule |
_version_ |
1716752792335417344 |