Freud and the algorithm: neuropsychoanalysis as a framework to understand artificial general intelligence

Abstract The core hypothesis of this paper is that neuropsychoanalysis provides a new paradigm for artificial general intelligence (AGI). The AGI agenda could be greatly advanced if it were grounded in affective neuroscience and neuropsychoanalysis rather than cognitive science. Research in AGI has...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Luca M. Possati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2021-05-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00812-y
id doaj-14b9f9b272eb4826ad8d82ecd8b29277
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14b9f9b272eb4826ad8d82ecd8b292772021-06-06T11:06:41ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922021-05-018111910.1057/s41599-021-00812-yFreud and the algorithm: neuropsychoanalysis as a framework to understand artificial general intelligenceLuca M. Possati0University of PortoAbstract The core hypothesis of this paper is that neuropsychoanalysis provides a new paradigm for artificial general intelligence (AGI). The AGI agenda could be greatly advanced if it were grounded in affective neuroscience and neuropsychoanalysis rather than cognitive science. Research in AGI has so far remained too cortical-centric; that is, it has privileged the activities of the cerebral cortex, the outermost part of our brain, and the main cognitive functions. Neuropsychoanalysis and affective neuroscience, on the other hand, affirm the centrality of emotions and affects—i.e., the subcortical area that represents the deepest and most ancient part of the brain in psychic life. The aim of this paper is to define some general design principles of an AGI system based on the brain/mind relationship model formulated in the works of Mark Solms and Jaak Panksepp. In particular, the paper analyzes Panksepp’s seven effective systems and how they can be embedded into an AGI system through Judea Pearl’s causal analysis. In the conclusions, the author explains why building a sub-cortical AGI is the best way to solve the problem of AI control. This paper is intended to be an original contribution to the discussion on AGI by elaborating positive arguments in favor of it.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00812-y
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luca M. Possati
spellingShingle Luca M. Possati
Freud and the algorithm: neuropsychoanalysis as a framework to understand artificial general intelligence
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
author_facet Luca M. Possati
author_sort Luca M. Possati
title Freud and the algorithm: neuropsychoanalysis as a framework to understand artificial general intelligence
title_short Freud and the algorithm: neuropsychoanalysis as a framework to understand artificial general intelligence
title_full Freud and the algorithm: neuropsychoanalysis as a framework to understand artificial general intelligence
title_fullStr Freud and the algorithm: neuropsychoanalysis as a framework to understand artificial general intelligence
title_full_unstemmed Freud and the algorithm: neuropsychoanalysis as a framework to understand artificial general intelligence
title_sort freud and the algorithm: neuropsychoanalysis as a framework to understand artificial general intelligence
publisher Springer Nature
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
issn 2662-9992
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract The core hypothesis of this paper is that neuropsychoanalysis provides a new paradigm for artificial general intelligence (AGI). The AGI agenda could be greatly advanced if it were grounded in affective neuroscience and neuropsychoanalysis rather than cognitive science. Research in AGI has so far remained too cortical-centric; that is, it has privileged the activities of the cerebral cortex, the outermost part of our brain, and the main cognitive functions. Neuropsychoanalysis and affective neuroscience, on the other hand, affirm the centrality of emotions and affects—i.e., the subcortical area that represents the deepest and most ancient part of the brain in psychic life. The aim of this paper is to define some general design principles of an AGI system based on the brain/mind relationship model formulated in the works of Mark Solms and Jaak Panksepp. In particular, the paper analyzes Panksepp’s seven effective systems and how they can be embedded into an AGI system through Judea Pearl’s causal analysis. In the conclusions, the author explains why building a sub-cortical AGI is the best way to solve the problem of AI control. This paper is intended to be an original contribution to the discussion on AGI by elaborating positive arguments in favor of it.
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00812-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lucampossati freudandthealgorithmneuropsychoanalysisasaframeworktounderstandartificialgeneralintelligence
_version_ 1721394379540660224