Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review
Abstract Background There is convincing evidence that birth in hospitals with high birth volumes increases the chance of healthy survival in high-risk infants. However, it is unclear whether this is true also for low risk infants. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze effects of hospital’...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03988-y |
id |
doaj-14b9649bcbb94671b67478809bb5064f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-14b9649bcbb94671b67478809bb5064f2021-08-01T11:35:27ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932021-07-0121111610.1186/s12884-021-03988-yAre birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic reviewFelix Walther0Denise Kuester1Anja Bieber2Jürgen Malzahn3Mario Rüdiger4Jochen Schmitt5Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU DresdenCenter for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU DresdenInstitute of Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-WittenbergFederation of Local Health Insurance Funds, Clinical CareDepartment for Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität DresdenCenter for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU DresdenAbstract Background There is convincing evidence that birth in hospitals with high birth volumes increases the chance of healthy survival in high-risk infants. However, it is unclear whether this is true also for low risk infants. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze effects of hospital’s birth volume on mortality, mode of delivery, readmissions, complications and subsequent developmental delays in all births or predefined low risk birth cohorts. The search strategy included EMBASE and Medline supplemented by citing and cited literature of included studies and expert panel highlighting additional literature, published between January/2000 and February/2020. We included studies which were published in English or German language reporting effects of birth volumes on mortality in term or all births in countries with neonatal mortality < 5/1000. We undertook a double-independent title-abstract- and full-text screening and extraction of study characteristics, critical appraisal and outcomes in a qualitative evidence synthesis. Results 13 retrospective studies with mostly acceptable quality were included. Heterogeneous volume-thresholds, risk adjustments, outcomes and populations hindered a meta-analysis. Qualitatively, four of six studies reported significantly higher perinatal mortality in lower birth volume hospitals. Volume-outcome effects on neonatal mortality (n = 7), stillbirths (n = 3), maternal mortality (n = 1), caesarean sections (n = 2), maternal (n = 1) and neonatal complications (n = 1) were inconclusive. Conclusion Analyzed studies indicate higher rates of perinatal mortality for low risk birth in hospitals with low birth volumes. Due to heterogeneity of studies, data synthesis was complicated and a meta-analysis was not possible. Therefore international core outcome sets should be defined and implemented in perinatal registries. Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42018095289https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03988-yMortalityInfantLow risk birthPerinatal regionalizationVolume-outcome |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Felix Walther Denise Kuester Anja Bieber Jürgen Malzahn Mario Rüdiger Jochen Schmitt |
spellingShingle |
Felix Walther Denise Kuester Anja Bieber Jürgen Malzahn Mario Rüdiger Jochen Schmitt Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Mortality Infant Low risk birth Perinatal regionalization Volume-outcome |
author_facet |
Felix Walther Denise Kuester Anja Bieber Jürgen Malzahn Mario Rüdiger Jochen Schmitt |
author_sort |
Felix Walther |
title |
Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review |
title_short |
Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review |
title_full |
Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review |
title_sort |
are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? a systematic review |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth |
issn |
1471-2393 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Background There is convincing evidence that birth in hospitals with high birth volumes increases the chance of healthy survival in high-risk infants. However, it is unclear whether this is true also for low risk infants. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze effects of hospital’s birth volume on mortality, mode of delivery, readmissions, complications and subsequent developmental delays in all births or predefined low risk birth cohorts. The search strategy included EMBASE and Medline supplemented by citing and cited literature of included studies and expert panel highlighting additional literature, published between January/2000 and February/2020. We included studies which were published in English or German language reporting effects of birth volumes on mortality in term or all births in countries with neonatal mortality < 5/1000. We undertook a double-independent title-abstract- and full-text screening and extraction of study characteristics, critical appraisal and outcomes in a qualitative evidence synthesis. Results 13 retrospective studies with mostly acceptable quality were included. Heterogeneous volume-thresholds, risk adjustments, outcomes and populations hindered a meta-analysis. Qualitatively, four of six studies reported significantly higher perinatal mortality in lower birth volume hospitals. Volume-outcome effects on neonatal mortality (n = 7), stillbirths (n = 3), maternal mortality (n = 1), caesarean sections (n = 2), maternal (n = 1) and neonatal complications (n = 1) were inconclusive. Conclusion Analyzed studies indicate higher rates of perinatal mortality for low risk birth in hospitals with low birth volumes. Due to heterogeneity of studies, data synthesis was complicated and a meta-analysis was not possible. Therefore international core outcome sets should be defined and implemented in perinatal registries. Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42018095289 |
topic |
Mortality Infant Low risk birth Perinatal regionalization Volume-outcome |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03988-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT felixwalther arebirthoutcomesinlowriskbirthcohortsrelatedtohospitalbirthvolumesasystematicreview AT denisekuester arebirthoutcomesinlowriskbirthcohortsrelatedtohospitalbirthvolumesasystematicreview AT anjabieber arebirthoutcomesinlowriskbirthcohortsrelatedtohospitalbirthvolumesasystematicreview AT jurgenmalzahn arebirthoutcomesinlowriskbirthcohortsrelatedtohospitalbirthvolumesasystematicreview AT mariorudiger arebirthoutcomesinlowriskbirthcohortsrelatedtohospitalbirthvolumesasystematicreview AT jochenschmitt arebirthoutcomesinlowriskbirthcohortsrelatedtohospitalbirthvolumesasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1721245747049922560 |