Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review

Abstract Background There is convincing evidence that birth in hospitals with high birth volumes increases the chance of healthy survival in high-risk infants. However, it is unclear whether this is true also for low risk infants. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze effects of hospital’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Felix Walther, Denise Kuester, Anja Bieber, Jürgen Malzahn, Mario Rüdiger, Jochen Schmitt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-07-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03988-y
id doaj-14b9649bcbb94671b67478809bb5064f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14b9649bcbb94671b67478809bb5064f2021-08-01T11:35:27ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932021-07-0121111610.1186/s12884-021-03988-yAre birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic reviewFelix Walther0Denise Kuester1Anja Bieber2Jürgen Malzahn3Mario Rüdiger4Jochen Schmitt5Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU DresdenCenter for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU DresdenInstitute of Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-WittenbergFederation of Local Health Insurance Funds, Clinical CareDepartment for Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität DresdenCenter for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU DresdenAbstract Background There is convincing evidence that birth in hospitals with high birth volumes increases the chance of healthy survival in high-risk infants. However, it is unclear whether this is true also for low risk infants. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze effects of hospital’s birth volume on mortality, mode of delivery, readmissions, complications and subsequent developmental delays in all births or predefined low risk birth cohorts. The search strategy included EMBASE and Medline supplemented by citing and cited literature of included studies and expert panel highlighting additional literature, published between January/2000 and February/2020. We included studies which were published in English or German language reporting effects of birth volumes on mortality in term or all births in countries with neonatal mortality < 5/1000. We undertook a double-independent title-abstract- and full-text screening and extraction of study characteristics, critical appraisal and outcomes in a qualitative evidence synthesis. Results 13 retrospective studies with mostly acceptable quality were included. Heterogeneous volume-thresholds, risk adjustments, outcomes and populations hindered a meta-analysis. Qualitatively, four of six studies reported significantly higher perinatal mortality in lower birth volume hospitals. Volume-outcome effects on neonatal mortality (n = 7), stillbirths (n = 3), maternal mortality (n = 1), caesarean sections (n = 2), maternal (n = 1) and neonatal complications (n = 1) were inconclusive. Conclusion Analyzed studies indicate higher rates of perinatal mortality for low risk birth in hospitals with low birth volumes. Due to heterogeneity of studies, data synthesis was complicated and a meta-analysis was not possible. Therefore international core outcome sets should be defined and implemented in perinatal registries. Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42018095289https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03988-yMortalityInfantLow risk birthPerinatal regionalizationVolume-outcome
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Felix Walther
Denise Kuester
Anja Bieber
Jürgen Malzahn
Mario Rüdiger
Jochen Schmitt
spellingShingle Felix Walther
Denise Kuester
Anja Bieber
Jürgen Malzahn
Mario Rüdiger
Jochen Schmitt
Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Mortality
Infant
Low risk birth
Perinatal regionalization
Volume-outcome
author_facet Felix Walther
Denise Kuester
Anja Bieber
Jürgen Malzahn
Mario Rüdiger
Jochen Schmitt
author_sort Felix Walther
title Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review
title_short Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review
title_full Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review
title_fullStr Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review
title_sort are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? a systematic review
publisher BMC
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
issn 1471-2393
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Background There is convincing evidence that birth in hospitals with high birth volumes increases the chance of healthy survival in high-risk infants. However, it is unclear whether this is true also for low risk infants. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze effects of hospital’s birth volume on mortality, mode of delivery, readmissions, complications and subsequent developmental delays in all births or predefined low risk birth cohorts. The search strategy included EMBASE and Medline supplemented by citing and cited literature of included studies and expert panel highlighting additional literature, published between January/2000 and February/2020. We included studies which were published in English or German language reporting effects of birth volumes on mortality in term or all births in countries with neonatal mortality < 5/1000. We undertook a double-independent title-abstract- and full-text screening and extraction of study characteristics, critical appraisal and outcomes in a qualitative evidence synthesis. Results 13 retrospective studies with mostly acceptable quality were included. Heterogeneous volume-thresholds, risk adjustments, outcomes and populations hindered a meta-analysis. Qualitatively, four of six studies reported significantly higher perinatal mortality in lower birth volume hospitals. Volume-outcome effects on neonatal mortality (n = 7), stillbirths (n = 3), maternal mortality (n = 1), caesarean sections (n = 2), maternal (n = 1) and neonatal complications (n = 1) were inconclusive. Conclusion Analyzed studies indicate higher rates of perinatal mortality for low risk birth in hospitals with low birth volumes. Due to heterogeneity of studies, data synthesis was complicated and a meta-analysis was not possible. Therefore international core outcome sets should be defined and implemented in perinatal registries. Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42018095289
topic Mortality
Infant
Low risk birth
Perinatal regionalization
Volume-outcome
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03988-y
work_keys_str_mv AT felixwalther arebirthoutcomesinlowriskbirthcohortsrelatedtohospitalbirthvolumesasystematicreview
AT denisekuester arebirthoutcomesinlowriskbirthcohortsrelatedtohospitalbirthvolumesasystematicreview
AT anjabieber arebirthoutcomesinlowriskbirthcohortsrelatedtohospitalbirthvolumesasystematicreview
AT jurgenmalzahn arebirthoutcomesinlowriskbirthcohortsrelatedtohospitalbirthvolumesasystematicreview
AT mariorudiger arebirthoutcomesinlowriskbirthcohortsrelatedtohospitalbirthvolumesasystematicreview
AT jochenschmitt arebirthoutcomesinlowriskbirthcohortsrelatedtohospitalbirthvolumesasystematicreview
_version_ 1721245747049922560