Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans

Background: Hemorrhagic transformation after acute ischemic stroke is a dreaded and severe complication of thrombolysis and thrombectomy. However, its detection on post-thrombectomy conventional non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan can be complicated by the frequent (and sometimes concomitant)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ronda Lun, Gregory B. Walker, Adrien Guenego, Mohammed Kassab, Eduardo Portela, Vignan Yogendrakumar, George Medvedev, Ken Wong, Michel Shamy, Dar Dowlatshahi, Robert Fahed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.593098/full
id doaj-14b3c5dea69746fc8eef7b4f2964cdf6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14b3c5dea69746fc8eef7b4f2964cdf62020-12-22T08:14:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952020-12-011110.3389/fneur.2020.593098593098Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography ScansRonda Lun0Gregory B. Walker1Gregory B. Walker2Adrien Guenego3Mohammed Kassab4Mohammed Kassab5Eduardo Portela6Vignan Yogendrakumar7George Medvedev8Ken Wong9Michel Shamy10Michel Shamy11Dar Dowlatshahi12Dar Dowlatshahi13Robert Fahed14Robert Fahed15Robert Fahed16Ottawa Stroke Program, Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Stroke Program, Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaDivision of Neurology, Fraser Health Authority, Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, BC, CanadaDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, BelgiumDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaInterventional Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaInterventional Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Stroke Program, Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaDivision of Neurology, Fraser Health Authority, Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, BC, CanadaDivision of Medical Imaging, Fraser Health Authority, Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, BC, CanadaOttawa Stroke Program, Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Stroke Program, Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Stroke Program, Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaInterventional Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, CanadaBackground: Hemorrhagic transformation after acute ischemic stroke is a dreaded and severe complication of thrombolysis and thrombectomy. However, its detection on post-thrombectomy conventional non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan can be complicated by the frequent (and sometimes concomitant) presence of contrast, resulting in changes in management.Aims: Our objective was to assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability for the detection of blood and/or contrast on day-1 post-thrombectomy CT scans.Methods: A total of 18 raters across 3 different specialties independently examined 30 post-thrombectomy CT scans selected from the Aspiration vs. STEnt-Retriever (ASTER) trial. They were asked to judge the presence of blood and contrast. Thirty days later, the same 18 raters again independently judged the 30 scans, in randomized order. Agreement was measured with Fleiss' and Cohen's K statistics.Results: Overall agreement on blood and/ or contrast presence was only fair, k = 0.291 (95% CI = 0.273–0.309). There were 0 scans with consensus among the 18 readers on the presence of blood and/or contrast. However, intra-rater global agreement across all 18 physicians was relatively high, with a median kappa value of 0.675. This intra-rater consistency was seen across all specialties, regardless of level of training.Conclusion: Physician judgment for the presence of blood and/or contrast on day-1 post-thrombectomy non-contrast CT scan shows limited inter-observer reliability. Advanced imaging modalities may then be warranted for challenging clinical cases.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.593098/fullstrokeischemic strokethrombectomyhemorrhagecerebralagreement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ronda Lun
Gregory B. Walker
Gregory B. Walker
Adrien Guenego
Mohammed Kassab
Mohammed Kassab
Eduardo Portela
Vignan Yogendrakumar
George Medvedev
Ken Wong
Michel Shamy
Michel Shamy
Dar Dowlatshahi
Dar Dowlatshahi
Robert Fahed
Robert Fahed
Robert Fahed
spellingShingle Ronda Lun
Gregory B. Walker
Gregory B. Walker
Adrien Guenego
Mohammed Kassab
Mohammed Kassab
Eduardo Portela
Vignan Yogendrakumar
George Medvedev
Ken Wong
Michel Shamy
Michel Shamy
Dar Dowlatshahi
Dar Dowlatshahi
Robert Fahed
Robert Fahed
Robert Fahed
Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans
Frontiers in Neurology
stroke
ischemic stroke
thrombectomy
hemorrhage
cerebral
agreement
author_facet Ronda Lun
Gregory B. Walker
Gregory B. Walker
Adrien Guenego
Mohammed Kassab
Mohammed Kassab
Eduardo Portela
Vignan Yogendrakumar
George Medvedev
Ken Wong
Michel Shamy
Michel Shamy
Dar Dowlatshahi
Dar Dowlatshahi
Robert Fahed
Robert Fahed
Robert Fahed
author_sort Ronda Lun
title Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans
title_short Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans
title_full Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans
title_fullStr Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans
title_full_unstemmed Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans
title_sort is this contrast? is this blood? an agreement study on post-thrombectomy computed tomography scans
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Background: Hemorrhagic transformation after acute ischemic stroke is a dreaded and severe complication of thrombolysis and thrombectomy. However, its detection on post-thrombectomy conventional non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan can be complicated by the frequent (and sometimes concomitant) presence of contrast, resulting in changes in management.Aims: Our objective was to assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability for the detection of blood and/or contrast on day-1 post-thrombectomy CT scans.Methods: A total of 18 raters across 3 different specialties independently examined 30 post-thrombectomy CT scans selected from the Aspiration vs. STEnt-Retriever (ASTER) trial. They were asked to judge the presence of blood and contrast. Thirty days later, the same 18 raters again independently judged the 30 scans, in randomized order. Agreement was measured with Fleiss' and Cohen's K statistics.Results: Overall agreement on blood and/ or contrast presence was only fair, k = 0.291 (95% CI = 0.273–0.309). There were 0 scans with consensus among the 18 readers on the presence of blood and/or contrast. However, intra-rater global agreement across all 18 physicians was relatively high, with a median kappa value of 0.675. This intra-rater consistency was seen across all specialties, regardless of level of training.Conclusion: Physician judgment for the presence of blood and/or contrast on day-1 post-thrombectomy non-contrast CT scan shows limited inter-observer reliability. Advanced imaging modalities may then be warranted for challenging clinical cases.
topic stroke
ischemic stroke
thrombectomy
hemorrhage
cerebral
agreement
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.593098/full
work_keys_str_mv AT rondalun isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT gregorybwalker isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT gregorybwalker isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT adrienguenego isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT mohammedkassab isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT mohammedkassab isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT eduardoportela isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT vignanyogendrakumar isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT georgemedvedev isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT kenwong isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT michelshamy isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT michelshamy isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT dardowlatshahi isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT dardowlatshahi isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT robertfahed isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT robertfahed isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
AT robertfahed isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans
_version_ 1724374188762857472