Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans
Background: Hemorrhagic transformation after acute ischemic stroke is a dreaded and severe complication of thrombolysis and thrombectomy. However, its detection on post-thrombectomy conventional non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan can be complicated by the frequent (and sometimes concomitant)...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neurology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.593098/full |
id |
doaj-14b3c5dea69746fc8eef7b4f2964cdf6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-14b3c5dea69746fc8eef7b4f2964cdf62020-12-22T08:14:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952020-12-011110.3389/fneur.2020.593098593098Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography ScansRonda Lun0Gregory B. Walker1Gregory B. Walker2Adrien Guenego3Mohammed Kassab4Mohammed Kassab5Eduardo Portela6Vignan Yogendrakumar7George Medvedev8Ken Wong9Michel Shamy10Michel Shamy11Dar Dowlatshahi12Dar Dowlatshahi13Robert Fahed14Robert Fahed15Robert Fahed16Ottawa Stroke Program, Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Stroke Program, Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaDivision of Neurology, Fraser Health Authority, Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, BC, CanadaDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, BelgiumDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaInterventional Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaInterventional Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Stroke Program, Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaDivision of Neurology, Fraser Health Authority, Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, BC, CanadaDivision of Medical Imaging, Fraser Health Authority, Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, BC, CanadaOttawa Stroke Program, Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Stroke Program, Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Stroke Program, Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaInterventional Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, CanadaBackground: Hemorrhagic transformation after acute ischemic stroke is a dreaded and severe complication of thrombolysis and thrombectomy. However, its detection on post-thrombectomy conventional non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan can be complicated by the frequent (and sometimes concomitant) presence of contrast, resulting in changes in management.Aims: Our objective was to assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability for the detection of blood and/or contrast on day-1 post-thrombectomy CT scans.Methods: A total of 18 raters across 3 different specialties independently examined 30 post-thrombectomy CT scans selected from the Aspiration vs. STEnt-Retriever (ASTER) trial. They were asked to judge the presence of blood and contrast. Thirty days later, the same 18 raters again independently judged the 30 scans, in randomized order. Agreement was measured with Fleiss' and Cohen's K statistics.Results: Overall agreement on blood and/ or contrast presence was only fair, k = 0.291 (95% CI = 0.273–0.309). There were 0 scans with consensus among the 18 readers on the presence of blood and/or contrast. However, intra-rater global agreement across all 18 physicians was relatively high, with a median kappa value of 0.675. This intra-rater consistency was seen across all specialties, regardless of level of training.Conclusion: Physician judgment for the presence of blood and/or contrast on day-1 post-thrombectomy non-contrast CT scan shows limited inter-observer reliability. Advanced imaging modalities may then be warranted for challenging clinical cases.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.593098/fullstrokeischemic strokethrombectomyhemorrhagecerebralagreement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ronda Lun Gregory B. Walker Gregory B. Walker Adrien Guenego Mohammed Kassab Mohammed Kassab Eduardo Portela Vignan Yogendrakumar George Medvedev Ken Wong Michel Shamy Michel Shamy Dar Dowlatshahi Dar Dowlatshahi Robert Fahed Robert Fahed Robert Fahed |
spellingShingle |
Ronda Lun Gregory B. Walker Gregory B. Walker Adrien Guenego Mohammed Kassab Mohammed Kassab Eduardo Portela Vignan Yogendrakumar George Medvedev Ken Wong Michel Shamy Michel Shamy Dar Dowlatshahi Dar Dowlatshahi Robert Fahed Robert Fahed Robert Fahed Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans Frontiers in Neurology stroke ischemic stroke thrombectomy hemorrhage cerebral agreement |
author_facet |
Ronda Lun Gregory B. Walker Gregory B. Walker Adrien Guenego Mohammed Kassab Mohammed Kassab Eduardo Portela Vignan Yogendrakumar George Medvedev Ken Wong Michel Shamy Michel Shamy Dar Dowlatshahi Dar Dowlatshahi Robert Fahed Robert Fahed Robert Fahed |
author_sort |
Ronda Lun |
title |
Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans |
title_short |
Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans |
title_full |
Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans |
title_fullStr |
Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is This Contrast? Is This Blood? An Agreement Study on Post-thrombectomy Computed Tomography Scans |
title_sort |
is this contrast? is this blood? an agreement study on post-thrombectomy computed tomography scans |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Neurology |
issn |
1664-2295 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Background: Hemorrhagic transformation after acute ischemic stroke is a dreaded and severe complication of thrombolysis and thrombectomy. However, its detection on post-thrombectomy conventional non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan can be complicated by the frequent (and sometimes concomitant) presence of contrast, resulting in changes in management.Aims: Our objective was to assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability for the detection of blood and/or contrast on day-1 post-thrombectomy CT scans.Methods: A total of 18 raters across 3 different specialties independently examined 30 post-thrombectomy CT scans selected from the Aspiration vs. STEnt-Retriever (ASTER) trial. They were asked to judge the presence of blood and contrast. Thirty days later, the same 18 raters again independently judged the 30 scans, in randomized order. Agreement was measured with Fleiss' and Cohen's K statistics.Results: Overall agreement on blood and/ or contrast presence was only fair, k = 0.291 (95% CI = 0.273–0.309). There were 0 scans with consensus among the 18 readers on the presence of blood and/or contrast. However, intra-rater global agreement across all 18 physicians was relatively high, with a median kappa value of 0.675. This intra-rater consistency was seen across all specialties, regardless of level of training.Conclusion: Physician judgment for the presence of blood and/or contrast on day-1 post-thrombectomy non-contrast CT scan shows limited inter-observer reliability. Advanced imaging modalities may then be warranted for challenging clinical cases. |
topic |
stroke ischemic stroke thrombectomy hemorrhage cerebral agreement |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.593098/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rondalun isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT gregorybwalker isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT gregorybwalker isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT adrienguenego isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT mohammedkassab isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT mohammedkassab isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT eduardoportela isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT vignanyogendrakumar isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT georgemedvedev isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT kenwong isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT michelshamy isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT michelshamy isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT dardowlatshahi isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT dardowlatshahi isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT robertfahed isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT robertfahed isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans AT robertfahed isthiscontrastisthisbloodanagreementstudyonpostthrombectomycomputedtomographyscans |
_version_ |
1724374188762857472 |