Imaging of Spinal Metastatic Disease
Metastases to the spine can involve the bone, epidural space, leptomeninges, and spinal cord. The spine is the third most common site for metastatic disease, following the lung and the liver. Approximately 60–70% of patients with systemic cancer will have spinal metastasis. Materials/Methods. This i...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2011-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Surgical Oncology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/769753 |
id |
doaj-14a8e3eccaa640488644f88ea2ba8f07 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-14a8e3eccaa640488644f88ea2ba8f072020-11-24T23:51:56ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Surgical Oncology2090-14022090-14102011-01-01201110.1155/2011/769753769753Imaging of Spinal Metastatic DiseaseLubdha M. Shah0Karen L. Salzman1Neuroradiology Division, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, The University of Utah, 1A71 SOM, 50 N. Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USANeuroradiology Division, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, The University of Utah, 1A71 SOM, 50 N. Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USAMetastases to the spine can involve the bone, epidural space, leptomeninges, and spinal cord. The spine is the third most common site for metastatic disease, following the lung and the liver. Approximately 60–70% of patients with systemic cancer will have spinal metastasis. Materials/Methods. This is a review of the imaging techniques and typical imaging appearances of spinal metastatic disease. Conclusions. Awareness of the different manifestations of spinal metastatic disease is essential as the spine is the most common site of osseous metastatic disease. Imaging modalities have complimentary roles in the evaluation of spinal metastatic disease. CT best delineates osseous integrity, while MRI is better at assessing soft tissue involvement. Physiologic properties, particularly in treated disease, can be evaluated with other imaging modalities such as FDG PET and advanced MRI sequences. Imaging plays a fundamental role in not only diagnosis but also treatment planning of spinal metastatic disease.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/769753 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lubdha M. Shah Karen L. Salzman |
spellingShingle |
Lubdha M. Shah Karen L. Salzman Imaging of Spinal Metastatic Disease International Journal of Surgical Oncology |
author_facet |
Lubdha M. Shah Karen L. Salzman |
author_sort |
Lubdha M. Shah |
title |
Imaging of Spinal Metastatic Disease |
title_short |
Imaging of Spinal Metastatic Disease |
title_full |
Imaging of Spinal Metastatic Disease |
title_fullStr |
Imaging of Spinal Metastatic Disease |
title_full_unstemmed |
Imaging of Spinal Metastatic Disease |
title_sort |
imaging of spinal metastatic disease |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
International Journal of Surgical Oncology |
issn |
2090-1402 2090-1410 |
publishDate |
2011-01-01 |
description |
Metastases to the spine can involve the bone, epidural space, leptomeninges, and spinal cord. The spine is the third most common site for metastatic disease, following the lung and the liver. Approximately 60–70% of patients with systemic cancer will have spinal metastasis. Materials/Methods. This is a review of the imaging techniques and typical imaging appearances of spinal metastatic disease. Conclusions. Awareness of the different manifestations of spinal metastatic disease is essential as the spine is the most common site of osseous metastatic disease. Imaging modalities have complimentary roles in the evaluation of spinal metastatic disease. CT best delineates osseous integrity, while MRI is better at assessing soft tissue involvement. Physiologic properties, particularly in treated disease, can be evaluated with other imaging modalities such as FDG PET and advanced MRI sequences. Imaging plays a fundamental role in not only diagnosis but also treatment planning of spinal metastatic disease. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/769753 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lubdhamshah imagingofspinalmetastaticdisease AT karenlsalzman imagingofspinalmetastaticdisease |
_version_ |
1725475481338249216 |