Comparison of root canal length measurement methods in primary teeth

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of conventional radiography, intraoral digital radiovisiography and electronic apex locator in determining the working length of root canals in primary teeth (in-vivo) and to compare the results with scanning electron microscopy meas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mine Koruyucu, Merve Bayram, Yelda Kasımoğlu, Figen Seymen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2018-07-01
Series:Dentistry 3000
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dentistry3000.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dentistry3000/article/view/83
id doaj-14567cae1e0947aea7126ddfd838f0e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-14567cae1e0947aea7126ddfd838f0e72020-11-25T01:08:23ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghDentistry 30002167-86772018-07-016110.5195/d3000.2018.8350Comparison of root canal length measurement methods in primary teethMine Koruyucu0Merve Bayram1Yelda Kasımoğlu2Figen Seymen3Research Assistant, Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Istanbul, TurkeyAssistant Professor, Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Istanbul, TurkeyResearch Assistant, Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Istanbul, TurkeyProfessor, Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Istanbul, TurkeyObjectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of conventional radiography, intraoral digital radiovisiography and electronic apex locator in determining the working length of root canals in primary teeth (in-vivo) and to compare the results with scanning electron microscopy measurements (ex-vivo). Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 50 primary molar teeth. Standard endodontic access cavity preparations were prepared and the actual length was calculated by calibrated investigators. Working lengths were determined by using conventional radiography, RVG and apex locator in a total of 116 root canals. After the extraction of the teeth, each canal length was determined by using SEM. Data were analysed statistically by using Oneway Anova, Tukey HDS, Student t test and Bonferroni tests. Results: The mean root length measurements with conventional radiography were significantly higher than apex locator, RVG and SEM. The accuracy of apex locator and RVG were higher than conventional radiography in determining the working length in primary teeth. Conclusions: The electronic apex locators provide an acceptable level of accuracy in determining root canal length in primary teeth. Clinical Relevance: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of conventional radiography, intraoral digital radiovisiography and electronic apex locator in determining the working length of root canals in primary teeth and,to compare the results with scanning electron microscopy measurements.http://dentistry3000.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dentistry3000/article/view/83apex locator, conventional radiography, RVG, SEM, working length
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mine Koruyucu
Merve Bayram
Yelda Kasımoğlu
Figen Seymen
spellingShingle Mine Koruyucu
Merve Bayram
Yelda Kasımoğlu
Figen Seymen
Comparison of root canal length measurement methods in primary teeth
Dentistry 3000
apex locator, conventional radiography, RVG, SEM, working length
author_facet Mine Koruyucu
Merve Bayram
Yelda Kasımoğlu
Figen Seymen
author_sort Mine Koruyucu
title Comparison of root canal length measurement methods in primary teeth
title_short Comparison of root canal length measurement methods in primary teeth
title_full Comparison of root canal length measurement methods in primary teeth
title_fullStr Comparison of root canal length measurement methods in primary teeth
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of root canal length measurement methods in primary teeth
title_sort comparison of root canal length measurement methods in primary teeth
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Dentistry 3000
issn 2167-8677
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of conventional radiography, intraoral digital radiovisiography and electronic apex locator in determining the working length of root canals in primary teeth (in-vivo) and to compare the results with scanning electron microscopy measurements (ex-vivo). Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 50 primary molar teeth. Standard endodontic access cavity preparations were prepared and the actual length was calculated by calibrated investigators. Working lengths were determined by using conventional radiography, RVG and apex locator in a total of 116 root canals. After the extraction of the teeth, each canal length was determined by using SEM. Data were analysed statistically by using Oneway Anova, Tukey HDS, Student t test and Bonferroni tests. Results: The mean root length measurements with conventional radiography were significantly higher than apex locator, RVG and SEM. The accuracy of apex locator and RVG were higher than conventional radiography in determining the working length in primary teeth. Conclusions: The electronic apex locators provide an acceptable level of accuracy in determining root canal length in primary teeth. Clinical Relevance: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of conventional radiography, intraoral digital radiovisiography and electronic apex locator in determining the working length of root canals in primary teeth and,to compare the results with scanning electron microscopy measurements.
topic apex locator, conventional radiography, RVG, SEM, working length
url http://dentistry3000.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dentistry3000/article/view/83
work_keys_str_mv AT minekoruyucu comparisonofrootcanallengthmeasurementmethodsinprimaryteeth
AT mervebayram comparisonofrootcanallengthmeasurementmethodsinprimaryteeth
AT yeldakasımoglu comparisonofrootcanallengthmeasurementmethodsinprimaryteeth
AT figenseymen comparisonofrootcanallengthmeasurementmethodsinprimaryteeth
_version_ 1725182848864878592