Planning Uncertainty: Creating an Artefact Density Index for North Yorkshire, England

Portable antiquities (sometimes known as small finds or chance finds) are often recorded within most Historic Environment Records to a spurious level of precision. For example, finds located only within a parish, or general area, are often mapped within GIS systems to exact points. Similarly, finds...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nick Boldrini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of York 2007-04-01
Series:Internet Archaeology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue21/boldrini_index.html
id doaj-1452781af07e4601b5e00638f91c73e9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1452781af07e4601b5e00638f91c73e92020-11-24T23:52:33ZengUniversity of YorkInternet Archaeology1363-53872007-04-012110.11141/ia.21.1Planning Uncertainty: Creating an Artefact Density Index for North Yorkshire, EnglandNick Boldrini0Heritage Unit, County Hall, NorthallertonPortable antiquities (sometimes known as small finds or chance finds) are often recorded within most Historic Environment Records to a spurious level of precision. For example, finds located only within a parish, or general area, are often mapped within GIS systems to exact points. Similarly, finds known only to the nearest kilometre square are usually mapped in the bottom left-hand corner of the square in GIS. While such mappings can be taken into account to some extent when trying to assess the archaeological potential of an area, the degree to which the records may give distorted views of the archaeological potential of an area may not be fully appreciated. This may mean that the full archaeological impacts of development may not be taken into account during development control decision making. This article looks at an alternative method for mapping such finds in order to produce an Artefact Density Index for areas, which more usefully reflects the pattern of activities across the landscape. The Artefact Density Index (ADI) was divided to reflect broad archaeological periods (e.g. Roman, medieval etc.), as well as broad artefact types (e.g. weapons, tools etc.). The ADI was based on combining weighted values for finds types, with the weight reflecting the precision of the location of the finds (i.e. finds recorded only at parish level will be given less weight than those recorded more precisely). An ADI was developed for a sub-area of the North Yorkshire County Council HER area, and also incorporated data from the Portable Antiquities scheme as a case study for the project.http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue21/boldrini_index.htmlarchaeological development controlartefact density mappingGeographical Information SystemHERs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nick Boldrini
spellingShingle Nick Boldrini
Planning Uncertainty: Creating an Artefact Density Index for North Yorkshire, England
Internet Archaeology
archaeological development control
artefact density mapping
Geographical Information System
HERs
author_facet Nick Boldrini
author_sort Nick Boldrini
title Planning Uncertainty: Creating an Artefact Density Index for North Yorkshire, England
title_short Planning Uncertainty: Creating an Artefact Density Index for North Yorkshire, England
title_full Planning Uncertainty: Creating an Artefact Density Index for North Yorkshire, England
title_fullStr Planning Uncertainty: Creating an Artefact Density Index for North Yorkshire, England
title_full_unstemmed Planning Uncertainty: Creating an Artefact Density Index for North Yorkshire, England
title_sort planning uncertainty: creating an artefact density index for north yorkshire, england
publisher University of York
series Internet Archaeology
issn 1363-5387
publishDate 2007-04-01
description Portable antiquities (sometimes known as small finds or chance finds) are often recorded within most Historic Environment Records to a spurious level of precision. For example, finds located only within a parish, or general area, are often mapped within GIS systems to exact points. Similarly, finds known only to the nearest kilometre square are usually mapped in the bottom left-hand corner of the square in GIS. While such mappings can be taken into account to some extent when trying to assess the archaeological potential of an area, the degree to which the records may give distorted views of the archaeological potential of an area may not be fully appreciated. This may mean that the full archaeological impacts of development may not be taken into account during development control decision making. This article looks at an alternative method for mapping such finds in order to produce an Artefact Density Index for areas, which more usefully reflects the pattern of activities across the landscape. The Artefact Density Index (ADI) was divided to reflect broad archaeological periods (e.g. Roman, medieval etc.), as well as broad artefact types (e.g. weapons, tools etc.). The ADI was based on combining weighted values for finds types, with the weight reflecting the precision of the location of the finds (i.e. finds recorded only at parish level will be given less weight than those recorded more precisely). An ADI was developed for a sub-area of the North Yorkshire County Council HER area, and also incorporated data from the Portable Antiquities scheme as a case study for the project.
topic archaeological development control
artefact density mapping
Geographical Information System
HERs
url http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue21/boldrini_index.html
work_keys_str_mv AT nickboldrini planninguncertaintycreatinganartefactdensityindexfornorthyorkshireengland
_version_ 1725473110393618432