Clinical outcome after orbital floor fracture reduction with special regard to patient's satisfaction

• Main Authors: Stefan Hartwig, Marie-Christine Nissen, Jan Oliver Voss, Christian Doll, Nicolai Adolphs, Max Heiland, Jan Dirk Raguse
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2019-06-01
• Series: Chinese Journal of Traumatology
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127518302980

Purpose: Primary reconstruction via transconjunctival approach is a standardized treatment option for orbital floor fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the findings of specific ophthalmologic assessment with the patient's complaints after fracture reduction. Methods: A retrospective medical chart analysis was performed on patients who had undergone transconjunctival orbital floor fracture reduction for fracture therapy with resorbable foil (ethisorb sheet or polydioxanone foil). A follow-up assessment including ophthalmological evaluation regarding visual acuity (eye chart projector), binocular visual field screening (Bagolini striated glasses test) and diplopia (cover test, Hess screen test) was conducted. Additionally, a questionnaire was performed to assess patients' satisfaction. Results: A total of 53 patients with a mean follow-up of 23 months (ranging from 11 to 72) after surgical therapy were included. Diplopia was present preoperatively in 23 (43.4%) and reduced in follow-up examination (n = 12, 22.6%). Limitations in ocular motility reduced from 37.7% to 7.5%. The questionnaire about the patient's satisfaction revealed excellent outcomes in relation to the functional and esthetical parameters. Conclusion: Transconjunctival approach is a safe approach for orbital fracture therapy. Postoperative diplopia is nearly never perceptible for the individual and differs to pathologic findings in the ophthalmic assessment. Keywords: Orbital floor fractures, Blow out fractures, Transconjunctival approach, Clinical outcome