The Floor is not the Ground

Although transportation infrastructures occupy an important part of public space, they have apparently been lead astray by recent developments in logistics services. Despite the categorical difference between transportation and logistics, narratives of quality, security and standards accompanied by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: George Papam Papamattheakis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jap Sam Books 2018-11-01
Series:Footprint
Online Access:https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/2040
id doaj-1449784991154775b49ca0d3266417b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1449784991154775b49ca0d3266417b32021-02-08T12:05:52ZengJap Sam BooksFootprint1875-15041875-14902018-11-0112210.7480/footprint.12.2.2040The Floor is not the GroundGeorge Papam Papamattheakis0Harokopio University in Athens, Urban Geography Although transportation infrastructures occupy an important part of public space, they have apparently been lead astray by recent developments in logistics services. Despite the categorical difference between transportation and logistics, narratives of quality, security and standards accompanied by specific spatial patterns, have infiltrated our everyday mobility infrastructures. Space structure is defined by logistics-influenced ‘functional diagrams’ and is reduced to mere transitory settings. This essay is an effort to challenge the contemporary ‘fulfilment’-influenced, network-based perception of human transportation spaces, towards, instead, a relational, and effectively political, understanding of them. This is not to return to previous debates on the re-emergence of place and identity, but rather to seek possible strategies of interruption of that detrimental, endlessly intensified circulation imposed on public space. The essay is structured upon two competing ideas, conceptually represented by the notions of floor and ground. The floor is the most important element of logistics architecture, preparing a smooth surface for commodities circulation. By contrast, the ground embraces anomalies representing finitude, an important notion for the project of interruptions. The essay proposes a recalibration and balancing of both these forces, establishing an ecology that also encourages seemingly ‘unproductive’ relations, detours and other spaces of distractions, ideas that logistical architecture cannot even grasp. https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/2040
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author George Papam Papamattheakis
spellingShingle George Papam Papamattheakis
The Floor is not the Ground
Footprint
author_facet George Papam Papamattheakis
author_sort George Papam Papamattheakis
title The Floor is not the Ground
title_short The Floor is not the Ground
title_full The Floor is not the Ground
title_fullStr The Floor is not the Ground
title_full_unstemmed The Floor is not the Ground
title_sort floor is not the ground
publisher Jap Sam Books
series Footprint
issn 1875-1504
1875-1490
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Although transportation infrastructures occupy an important part of public space, they have apparently been lead astray by recent developments in logistics services. Despite the categorical difference between transportation and logistics, narratives of quality, security and standards accompanied by specific spatial patterns, have infiltrated our everyday mobility infrastructures. Space structure is defined by logistics-influenced ‘functional diagrams’ and is reduced to mere transitory settings. This essay is an effort to challenge the contemporary ‘fulfilment’-influenced, network-based perception of human transportation spaces, towards, instead, a relational, and effectively political, understanding of them. This is not to return to previous debates on the re-emergence of place and identity, but rather to seek possible strategies of interruption of that detrimental, endlessly intensified circulation imposed on public space. The essay is structured upon two competing ideas, conceptually represented by the notions of floor and ground. The floor is the most important element of logistics architecture, preparing a smooth surface for commodities circulation. By contrast, the ground embraces anomalies representing finitude, an important notion for the project of interruptions. The essay proposes a recalibration and balancing of both these forces, establishing an ecology that also encourages seemingly ‘unproductive’ relations, detours and other spaces of distractions, ideas that logistical architecture cannot even grasp.
url https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/2040
work_keys_str_mv AT georgepapampapamattheakis thefloorisnottheground
AT georgepapampapamattheakis floorisnottheground
_version_ 1724280125351002112