The Quality of Canadian and U.S. Government Health Documents Remains Unchallenged Until Better Research Can Be Undertaken
A review of: Lambert, Frank. “Assessing the Authoritativeness of Canadian and American Health Documents: A Comparative Analysis Using Informetric Methodologies.” Government Information Quarterly 22.2 (2005): 277-96. Objective - To assess by means of citation analysis whether the public trust...
Main Author: | Michael Corkett |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Alberta
2006-12-01
|
Series: | Evidence Based Library and Information Practice |
Online Access: | https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/75 |
Similar Items
-
The Quality of Canadian and U.S. Government Health Documents Remains Unchallenged Until Better Research Can Be Undertaken. A review of: Lambert, Frank. “Assessing the Authoritativeness of Canadian and American Health Documents: A Comparative Analysis Using Informetric Methodologies.” Government Information Quarterly 22.2 (2005): 277‐96.
by: Michael Corkett
Published: (2006-12-01) -
REVIEW: Unchallenged bible of NZ media law
by: Alan Samson
Published: (2005-09-01) -
The Return of Remains: How Can Dignity Be Better Safeguarded?
by: Cook, Sian
Published: (2015) -
Cholesterol: until which age 'the lower the better'?
by: Niccolò Marchionni, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Until One of Us Disappears
by: Stacy, Ryan C
Published: (2018)