Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand
Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the cost and benefit of four different cervical cancer screening strategies involving primary HPV 16/18 genotyping, hrHPV testing alone and cytology for detecting CIN2+. Methods: Economical analysis using Markov modeling approach to combine the epidemi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017-11-01
|
Series: | Gynecologic Oncology Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578917300991 |
id |
doaj-143647dc5df94099aa51ce772297ef45 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-143647dc5df94099aa51ce772297ef452020-11-25T00:04:03ZengElsevierGynecologic Oncology Reports2352-57892017-11-0122C586310.1016/j.gore.2017.09.007Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in ThailandWichai Termrungruanglert0Nipon Khemapech1Tanitra Tantitamit2Suleeporn Sangrajrang3Piyalamporn Havanond4Piyawat Laowahutanont5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Nakhonnayok, ThailandHealth System Development, National Cancer Institute of Thailand, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, ThailandGynecologic Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute of Thailand, Bangkok, ThailandObjectives: The aim of this study is to compare the cost and benefit of four different cervical cancer screening strategies involving primary HPV 16/18 genotyping, hrHPV testing alone and cytology for detecting CIN2+. Methods: Economical analysis using Markov modeling approach to combine the epidemiological data from current population-based study of The National Cancer Institute of Thailand. A cohort of 100,000 hypothetical female population age 30–65 years was simulated in each strategy. The compared strategies are HPV 16/18 genotyping with reflexed cytology, hrHPV testing alone followed by colposcopy, Papanicolaou standard cytology and liquid based cytology followed by colposcopy. The interval of screening was 5 years' interval. The main outcomes were defined as a number of CIN2+ cases and cost per 100,000 women screening over 35 years. Results: Model predictions indicated that, the most cost-effectiveness strategy is hrHPV testing alone by reducing cost and also increase CIN2+ detection rate. It identify an additional 130 cases and decrease cost by 46,950,840 THB (1,394,441 USD) per 100,000 women screened when compared to HPV 16/18 genotyping. Compared with cytology, hrHPV testing decrease cost by 51,279,781 THB (1,523,011 USD) and detected more 506 cases of CIN2+. From sensitivity analysis, the cost of HPV testing, cost of colposcopy, incidence of HPV infection and sensitivity of cytology may affect the results. (1 USD = 33.67 Baht). Conclusion: The results of this cost-effectiveness analysis support the full scale implementation of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578917300991Cervical cancerScreeningHuman papillomavirus testingLiquid based cytologyMarkov modelCost effectiveness analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wichai Termrungruanglert Nipon Khemapech Tanitra Tantitamit Suleeporn Sangrajrang Piyalamporn Havanond Piyawat Laowahutanont |
spellingShingle |
Wichai Termrungruanglert Nipon Khemapech Tanitra Tantitamit Suleeporn Sangrajrang Piyalamporn Havanond Piyawat Laowahutanont Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand Gynecologic Oncology Reports Cervical cancer Screening Human papillomavirus testing Liquid based cytology Markov model Cost effectiveness analysis |
author_facet |
Wichai Termrungruanglert Nipon Khemapech Tanitra Tantitamit Suleeporn Sangrajrang Piyalamporn Havanond Piyawat Laowahutanont |
author_sort |
Wichai Termrungruanglert |
title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand |
title_short |
Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand |
title_full |
Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand |
title_fullStr |
Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand |
title_sort |
cost-effectiveness analysis study of hpv testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in thailand |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Gynecologic Oncology Reports |
issn |
2352-5789 |
publishDate |
2017-11-01 |
description |
Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the cost and benefit of four different cervical cancer screening strategies involving primary HPV 16/18 genotyping, hrHPV testing alone and cytology for detecting CIN2+.
Methods: Economical analysis using Markov modeling approach to combine the epidemiological data from current population-based study of The National Cancer Institute of Thailand. A cohort of 100,000 hypothetical female population age 30–65 years was simulated in each strategy. The compared strategies are HPV 16/18 genotyping with reflexed cytology, hrHPV testing alone followed by colposcopy, Papanicolaou standard cytology and liquid based cytology followed by colposcopy. The interval of screening was 5 years' interval. The main outcomes were defined as a number of CIN2+ cases and cost per 100,000 women screening over 35 years.
Results: Model predictions indicated that, the most cost-effectiveness strategy is hrHPV testing alone by reducing cost and also increase CIN2+ detection rate. It identify an additional 130 cases and decrease cost by 46,950,840 THB (1,394,441 USD) per 100,000 women screened when compared to HPV 16/18 genotyping. Compared with cytology, hrHPV testing decrease cost by 51,279,781 THB (1,523,011 USD) and detected more 506 cases of CIN2+. From sensitivity analysis, the cost of HPV testing, cost of colposcopy, incidence of HPV infection and sensitivity of cytology may affect the results. (1 USD = 33.67 Baht).
Conclusion: The results of this cost-effectiveness analysis support the full scale implementation of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand. |
topic |
Cervical cancer Screening Human papillomavirus testing Liquid based cytology Markov model Cost effectiveness analysis |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578917300991 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wichaitermrungruanglert costeffectivenessanalysisstudyofhpvtestingasaprimarycervicalcancerscreeninginthailand AT niponkhemapech costeffectivenessanalysisstudyofhpvtestingasaprimarycervicalcancerscreeninginthailand AT tanitratantitamit costeffectivenessanalysisstudyofhpvtestingasaprimarycervicalcancerscreeninginthailand AT suleepornsangrajrang costeffectivenessanalysisstudyofhpvtestingasaprimarycervicalcancerscreeninginthailand AT piyalampornhavanond costeffectivenessanalysisstudyofhpvtestingasaprimarycervicalcancerscreeninginthailand AT piyawatlaowahutanont costeffectivenessanalysisstudyofhpvtestingasaprimarycervicalcancerscreeninginthailand |
_version_ |
1725431344183377920 |