Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand

Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the cost and benefit of four different cervical cancer screening strategies involving primary HPV 16/18 genotyping, hrHPV testing alone and cytology for detecting CIN2+. Methods: Economical analysis using Markov modeling approach to combine the epidemi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wichai Termrungruanglert, Nipon Khemapech, Tanitra Tantitamit, Suleeporn Sangrajrang, Piyalamporn Havanond, Piyawat Laowahutanont
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-11-01
Series:Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578917300991
id doaj-143647dc5df94099aa51ce772297ef45
record_format Article
spelling doaj-143647dc5df94099aa51ce772297ef452020-11-25T00:04:03ZengElsevierGynecologic Oncology Reports2352-57892017-11-0122C586310.1016/j.gore.2017.09.007Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in ThailandWichai Termrungruanglert0Nipon Khemapech1Tanitra Tantitamit2Suleeporn Sangrajrang3Piyalamporn Havanond4Piyawat Laowahutanont5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Nakhonnayok, ThailandHealth System Development, National Cancer Institute of Thailand, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, ThailandGynecologic Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute of Thailand, Bangkok, ThailandObjectives: The aim of this study is to compare the cost and benefit of four different cervical cancer screening strategies involving primary HPV 16/18 genotyping, hrHPV testing alone and cytology for detecting CIN2+. Methods: Economical analysis using Markov modeling approach to combine the epidemiological data from current population-based study of The National Cancer Institute of Thailand. A cohort of 100,000 hypothetical female population age 30–65 years was simulated in each strategy. The compared strategies are HPV 16/18 genotyping with reflexed cytology, hrHPV testing alone followed by colposcopy, Papanicolaou standard cytology and liquid based cytology followed by colposcopy. The interval of screening was 5 years' interval. The main outcomes were defined as a number of CIN2+ cases and cost per 100,000 women screening over 35 years. Results: Model predictions indicated that, the most cost-effectiveness strategy is hrHPV testing alone by reducing cost and also increase CIN2+ detection rate. It identify an additional 130 cases and decrease cost by 46,950,840 THB (1,394,441 USD) per 100,000 women screened when compared to HPV 16/18 genotyping. Compared with cytology, hrHPV testing decrease cost by 51,279,781 THB (1,523,011 USD) and detected more 506 cases of CIN2+. From sensitivity analysis, the cost of HPV testing, cost of colposcopy, incidence of HPV infection and sensitivity of cytology may affect the results. (1 USD = 33.67 Baht). Conclusion: The results of this cost-effectiveness analysis support the full scale implementation of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578917300991Cervical cancerScreeningHuman papillomavirus testingLiquid based cytologyMarkov modelCost effectiveness analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wichai Termrungruanglert
Nipon Khemapech
Tanitra Tantitamit
Suleeporn Sangrajrang
Piyalamporn Havanond
Piyawat Laowahutanont
spellingShingle Wichai Termrungruanglert
Nipon Khemapech
Tanitra Tantitamit
Suleeporn Sangrajrang
Piyalamporn Havanond
Piyawat Laowahutanont
Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Cervical cancer
Screening
Human papillomavirus testing
Liquid based cytology
Markov model
Cost effectiveness analysis
author_facet Wichai Termrungruanglert
Nipon Khemapech
Tanitra Tantitamit
Suleeporn Sangrajrang
Piyalamporn Havanond
Piyawat Laowahutanont
author_sort Wichai Termrungruanglert
title Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis study of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis study of hpv testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in thailand
publisher Elsevier
series Gynecologic Oncology Reports
issn 2352-5789
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the cost and benefit of four different cervical cancer screening strategies involving primary HPV 16/18 genotyping, hrHPV testing alone and cytology for detecting CIN2+. Methods: Economical analysis using Markov modeling approach to combine the epidemiological data from current population-based study of The National Cancer Institute of Thailand. A cohort of 100,000 hypothetical female population age 30–65 years was simulated in each strategy. The compared strategies are HPV 16/18 genotyping with reflexed cytology, hrHPV testing alone followed by colposcopy, Papanicolaou standard cytology and liquid based cytology followed by colposcopy. The interval of screening was 5 years' interval. The main outcomes were defined as a number of CIN2+ cases and cost per 100,000 women screening over 35 years. Results: Model predictions indicated that, the most cost-effectiveness strategy is hrHPV testing alone by reducing cost and also increase CIN2+ detection rate. It identify an additional 130 cases and decrease cost by 46,950,840 THB (1,394,441 USD) per 100,000 women screened when compared to HPV 16/18 genotyping. Compared with cytology, hrHPV testing decrease cost by 51,279,781 THB (1,523,011 USD) and detected more 506 cases of CIN2+. From sensitivity analysis, the cost of HPV testing, cost of colposcopy, incidence of HPV infection and sensitivity of cytology may affect the results. (1 USD = 33.67 Baht). Conclusion: The results of this cost-effectiveness analysis support the full scale implementation of HPV testing as a primary cervical cancer screening in Thailand.
topic Cervical cancer
Screening
Human papillomavirus testing
Liquid based cytology
Markov model
Cost effectiveness analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578917300991
work_keys_str_mv AT wichaitermrungruanglert costeffectivenessanalysisstudyofhpvtestingasaprimarycervicalcancerscreeninginthailand
AT niponkhemapech costeffectivenessanalysisstudyofhpvtestingasaprimarycervicalcancerscreeninginthailand
AT tanitratantitamit costeffectivenessanalysisstudyofhpvtestingasaprimarycervicalcancerscreeninginthailand
AT suleepornsangrajrang costeffectivenessanalysisstudyofhpvtestingasaprimarycervicalcancerscreeninginthailand
AT piyalampornhavanond costeffectivenessanalysisstudyofhpvtestingasaprimarycervicalcancerscreeninginthailand
AT piyawatlaowahutanont costeffectivenessanalysisstudyofhpvtestingasaprimarycervicalcancerscreeninginthailand
_version_ 1725431344183377920