Tourism Sciences or Tourism Studies?Implications for the Design and Content of Tourism Programming
We regard this invitation to prepare a paper on the topic “Tourism Sciences or Tourism Studies” as both a privilege and a challenge. It is a privilege, in that it provides an opportunity to present a personal perspective on a topic that has been discussed and debated for some time, yet it is a chall...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Presses de l'Université du Québec
2008-03-01
|
Series: | Téoros |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/teoros/1621 |
id |
doaj-14332ecfde8c4a418ce02748b332aa55 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-14332ecfde8c4a418ce02748b332aa552020-12-08T09:28:18ZfraPresses de l'Université du QuébecTéoros0712-86571923-27052008-03-012713341Tourism Sciences or Tourism Studies?Implications for the Design and Content of Tourism ProgrammingJ.R. Brent RitchieLorn R. SheehanSeldjan TimurWe regard this invitation to prepare a paper on the topic “Tourism Sciences or Tourism Studies” as both a privilege and a challenge. It is a privilege, in that it provides an opportunity to present a personal perspective on a topic that has been discussed and debated for some time, yet it is a challenge also, because there has been only a modest resolution of the issues involved. Tourism science is designed to provide a theoretical understanding of tourism. Tourism studies (as the applied study of tourism) are designed to enhance our ability to effectively manage the destination and, in doing so, enhance the well-being of the residents of a tourism destination. It is hoped that the overview of the material we used to make the distinction between tourism science and tourism studies has been helpful. While we would have liked to provide much greater detail in order to make certain of our arguments more effective, we have faced fairly severe space limitations. We can only hope that we have still been able to convey the essence of our message.http://journals.openedition.org/teoros/1621disciplinesciencestudytheory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fra |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
J.R. Brent Ritchie Lorn R. Sheehan Seldjan Timur |
spellingShingle |
J.R. Brent Ritchie Lorn R. Sheehan Seldjan Timur Tourism Sciences or Tourism Studies?Implications for the Design and Content of Tourism Programming Téoros discipline science study theory |
author_facet |
J.R. Brent Ritchie Lorn R. Sheehan Seldjan Timur |
author_sort |
J.R. Brent Ritchie |
title |
Tourism Sciences or Tourism Studies?Implications for the Design and Content of Tourism Programming |
title_short |
Tourism Sciences or Tourism Studies?Implications for the Design and Content of Tourism Programming |
title_full |
Tourism Sciences or Tourism Studies?Implications for the Design and Content of Tourism Programming |
title_fullStr |
Tourism Sciences or Tourism Studies?Implications for the Design and Content of Tourism Programming |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tourism Sciences or Tourism Studies?Implications for the Design and Content of Tourism Programming |
title_sort |
tourism sciences or tourism studies?implications for the design and content of tourism programming |
publisher |
Presses de l'Université du Québec |
series |
Téoros |
issn |
0712-8657 1923-2705 |
publishDate |
2008-03-01 |
description |
We regard this invitation to prepare a paper on the topic “Tourism Sciences or Tourism Studies” as both a privilege and a challenge. It is a privilege, in that it provides an opportunity to present a personal perspective on a topic that has been discussed and debated for some time, yet it is a challenge also, because there has been only a modest resolution of the issues involved. Tourism science is designed to provide a theoretical understanding of tourism. Tourism studies (as the applied study of tourism) are designed to enhance our ability to effectively manage the destination and, in doing so, enhance the well-being of the residents of a tourism destination. It is hoped that the overview of the material we used to make the distinction between tourism science and tourism studies has been helpful. While we would have liked to provide much greater detail in order to make certain of our arguments more effective, we have faced fairly severe space limitations. We can only hope that we have still been able to convey the essence of our message. |
topic |
discipline science study theory |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/teoros/1621 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jrbrentritchie tourismsciencesortourismstudiesimplicationsforthedesignandcontentoftourismprogramming AT lornrsheehan tourismsciencesortourismstudiesimplicationsforthedesignandcontentoftourismprogramming AT seldjantimur tourismsciencesortourismstudiesimplicationsforthedesignandcontentoftourismprogramming |
_version_ |
1724389953746501632 |