Evaluation of quality in social-work practice

This theoretical article describes and discusses the concept of quality in relation to the evaluation of social-work practice. Of particular interest are the difference between quality of services and quality of life and the importance of balancing the stakeholders’ different interests in order to m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Björn Blom, Stefan Morén
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oslo and Akershus University College 2012-09-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/njsr/article/view/2062
id doaj-1432d87b2e2d4003af1f4f45d6469ea7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1432d87b2e2d4003af1f4f45d6469ea72020-11-24T21:48:29ZengOslo and Akershus University CollegeNordic Journal of Social Research1892-27832012-09-01310.7577/njsr.20621241Evaluation of quality in social-work practiceBjörn Blom0Stefan Morén1Dept. of Social Work, Umeå UniversityDept. of Social Work, Umeå UniversityThis theoretical article describes and discusses the concept of quality in relation to the evaluation of social-work practice. Of particular interest are the difference between quality of services and quality of life and the importance of balancing the stakeholders’ different interests in order to make a sound judgement of quality in social work possible. This article begins with presenting some basic perspectives on quality as well as the transference of the concept of quality from manufacturing industry to social-work practice. Thereafter the two main issues are discussed: the concepts of quality of service and of quality of life and the importance of balancing different stakeholders’ perspectives in the evaluation of quality in social-work practice. This article concludes that: 1) it is crucial to be aware of and to consider the distinction between quality of service and quality of life; 2) clients’ perspective on quality of life is an aspect of outcome that currently receives insufficient attention; 3) clients’ subjective experiences of welfare of well-being deserve greater attention for ethical as well as methodological reasons; and 4) judgement of quality in social work are inevitably dependent on different stakeholders’ perspectives.https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/njsr/article/view/2062EvaluationQuality of lifeQuality of serviceWelfareWell-beingSocial work
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Björn Blom
Stefan Morén
spellingShingle Björn Blom
Stefan Morén
Evaluation of quality in social-work practice
Nordic Journal of Social Research
Evaluation
Quality of life
Quality of service
Welfare
Well-being
Social work
author_facet Björn Blom
Stefan Morén
author_sort Björn Blom
title Evaluation of quality in social-work practice
title_short Evaluation of quality in social-work practice
title_full Evaluation of quality in social-work practice
title_fullStr Evaluation of quality in social-work practice
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of quality in social-work practice
title_sort evaluation of quality in social-work practice
publisher Oslo and Akershus University College
series Nordic Journal of Social Research
issn 1892-2783
publishDate 2012-09-01
description This theoretical article describes and discusses the concept of quality in relation to the evaluation of social-work practice. Of particular interest are the difference between quality of services and quality of life and the importance of balancing the stakeholders’ different interests in order to make a sound judgement of quality in social work possible. This article begins with presenting some basic perspectives on quality as well as the transference of the concept of quality from manufacturing industry to social-work practice. Thereafter the two main issues are discussed: the concepts of quality of service and of quality of life and the importance of balancing different stakeholders’ perspectives in the evaluation of quality in social-work practice. This article concludes that: 1) it is crucial to be aware of and to consider the distinction between quality of service and quality of life; 2) clients’ perspective on quality of life is an aspect of outcome that currently receives insufficient attention; 3) clients’ subjective experiences of welfare of well-being deserve greater attention for ethical as well as methodological reasons; and 4) judgement of quality in social work are inevitably dependent on different stakeholders’ perspectives.
topic Evaluation
Quality of life
Quality of service
Welfare
Well-being
Social work
url https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/njsr/article/view/2062
work_keys_str_mv AT bjornblom evaluationofqualityinsocialworkpractice
AT stefanmoren evaluationofqualityinsocialworkpractice
_version_ 1725891835996405760