Investment Review In Canada- We Can do Better

Although the Investment Canada Act (ICA) is often criticized for leaving investors and the public in the dark on government decisions regarding proposed foreign investments in Canada, nothing in the Conservative government’s platform suggests that the ICA’s basic framework will be changed. Moreover,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lawrence L. Herman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Calgary 2011-09-01
Series:The School of Public Policy Publications
Online Access:https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/herman-invest-canada-online_0.pdf
id doaj-141b56b15957411e937d7e32839bf081
record_format Article
spelling doaj-141b56b15957411e937d7e32839bf0812020-11-25T00:12:38ZengUniversity of CalgaryThe School of Public Policy Publications2560-83122560-83202011-09-01410115https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v4i0.42365Investment Review In Canada- We Can do BetterLawrence L. Herman0Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLPAlthough the Investment Canada Act (ICA) is often criticized for leaving investors and the public in the dark on government decisions regarding proposed foreign investments in Canada, nothing in the Conservative government’s platform suggests that the ICA’s basic framework will be changed. Moreover, there is no evidence that the ICA or the review process has limited foreign investment in Canada since the Act came into force. However, the legislation should be made more open and predictable, both for the application of the net benefit test and for determinations of national security issues. When a foreign acquisition is approved or rejected, the Industry Minister should be required to issue public reasons. Where investment approvals are given subject to undertakings, the general outlines should be made public. More transparency and public disclosure will make foreign investors confident the system is fair, objective and free from bias, bolstering Canada’s reputation as a fine place to invest. https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/herman-invest-canada-online_0.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lawrence L. Herman
spellingShingle Lawrence L. Herman
Investment Review In Canada- We Can do Better
The School of Public Policy Publications
author_facet Lawrence L. Herman
author_sort Lawrence L. Herman
title Investment Review In Canada- We Can do Better
title_short Investment Review In Canada- We Can do Better
title_full Investment Review In Canada- We Can do Better
title_fullStr Investment Review In Canada- We Can do Better
title_full_unstemmed Investment Review In Canada- We Can do Better
title_sort investment review in canada- we can do better
publisher University of Calgary
series The School of Public Policy Publications
issn 2560-8312
2560-8320
publishDate 2011-09-01
description Although the Investment Canada Act (ICA) is often criticized for leaving investors and the public in the dark on government decisions regarding proposed foreign investments in Canada, nothing in the Conservative government’s platform suggests that the ICA’s basic framework will be changed. Moreover, there is no evidence that the ICA or the review process has limited foreign investment in Canada since the Act came into force. However, the legislation should be made more open and predictable, both for the application of the net benefit test and for determinations of national security issues. When a foreign acquisition is approved or rejected, the Industry Minister should be required to issue public reasons. Where investment approvals are given subject to undertakings, the general outlines should be made public. More transparency and public disclosure will make foreign investors confident the system is fair, objective and free from bias, bolstering Canada’s reputation as a fine place to invest.
url https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/herman-invest-canada-online_0.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lawrencelherman investmentreviewincanadawecandobetter
_version_ 1725398469782274048