Are Private Providers more Productive and Efficient than Public Providers of International Education? Evidence from New Zealand

This study has investigated the productivity growth and efficiency of private and public providers of international education in New Zealand. It has used secondary data to calculate the DEA-based Malmquist productivity index for measuring Total Factor Productivity (TFP)-growth and efficiency of both...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dayal TALUKDER
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Saphira Publishing 2011-10-01
Series:Oeconomics of Knowledge
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sites.google.com/site/oeconomicsofknowledge/v3_i4_4q_2011_dt.pdf
id doaj-140b5fc73233479892c4a664f29bf306
record_format Article
spelling doaj-140b5fc73233479892c4a664f29bf3062020-11-24T21:19:00ZengSaphira PublishingOeconomics of Knowledge2066-83252011-10-0134223Are Private Providers more Productive and Efficient than Public Providers of International Education? Evidence from New ZealandDayal TALUKDERThis study has investigated the productivity growth and efficiency of private and public providers of international education in New Zealand. It has used secondary data to calculate the DEA-based Malmquist productivity index for measuring Total Factor Productivity (TFP)-growth and efficiency of both public and private providers of international education during 1999-2010. The study has found that private providers experienced a larger TFP-growth than that of public providers during 1999-2004. However, they experienced a sharp decline in TFP-growth since 2005 through to 2010 and experienced a much smaller TFP-growth than that of public providers during this period. Conversely, public providers experienced a positive TFP-growth during 1999-2004 but they experienced a negative TFP-growth since 2005 through to 2010. Considering efficiency, both private and public providers experienced almost a constant Technical Efficiency Change (TEC) having a same level of efficiency of one. Both private and public providers exhibited a constant return to scale during 1999-2010. This study argues that on an average, private providers are more productive than public providers of international education. However, they are not more efficient than public providers as both types of providers exhibited a constant return to scale during 1999-2010. This study also argues that TFP-growth of New Zealand’s international education was determined by Technological Change (TC), not by TEC during this period.https://sites.google.com/site/oeconomicsofknowledge/v3_i4_4q_2011_dt.pdfInternational educationtotal factor productivity growthproductivityefficiencyprivate and public education providersNew Zealand
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dayal TALUKDER
spellingShingle Dayal TALUKDER
Are Private Providers more Productive and Efficient than Public Providers of International Education? Evidence from New Zealand
Oeconomics of Knowledge
International education
total factor productivity growth
productivity
efficiency
private and public education providers
New Zealand
author_facet Dayal TALUKDER
author_sort Dayal TALUKDER
title Are Private Providers more Productive and Efficient than Public Providers of International Education? Evidence from New Zealand
title_short Are Private Providers more Productive and Efficient than Public Providers of International Education? Evidence from New Zealand
title_full Are Private Providers more Productive and Efficient than Public Providers of International Education? Evidence from New Zealand
title_fullStr Are Private Providers more Productive and Efficient than Public Providers of International Education? Evidence from New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed Are Private Providers more Productive and Efficient than Public Providers of International Education? Evidence from New Zealand
title_sort are private providers more productive and efficient than public providers of international education? evidence from new zealand
publisher Saphira Publishing
series Oeconomics of Knowledge
issn 2066-8325
publishDate 2011-10-01
description This study has investigated the productivity growth and efficiency of private and public providers of international education in New Zealand. It has used secondary data to calculate the DEA-based Malmquist productivity index for measuring Total Factor Productivity (TFP)-growth and efficiency of both public and private providers of international education during 1999-2010. The study has found that private providers experienced a larger TFP-growth than that of public providers during 1999-2004. However, they experienced a sharp decline in TFP-growth since 2005 through to 2010 and experienced a much smaller TFP-growth than that of public providers during this period. Conversely, public providers experienced a positive TFP-growth during 1999-2004 but they experienced a negative TFP-growth since 2005 through to 2010. Considering efficiency, both private and public providers experienced almost a constant Technical Efficiency Change (TEC) having a same level of efficiency of one. Both private and public providers exhibited a constant return to scale during 1999-2010. This study argues that on an average, private providers are more productive than public providers of international education. However, they are not more efficient than public providers as both types of providers exhibited a constant return to scale during 1999-2010. This study also argues that TFP-growth of New Zealand’s international education was determined by Technological Change (TC), not by TEC during this period.
topic International education
total factor productivity growth
productivity
efficiency
private and public education providers
New Zealand
url https://sites.google.com/site/oeconomicsofknowledge/v3_i4_4q_2011_dt.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dayaltalukder areprivateprovidersmoreproductiveandefficientthanpublicprovidersofinternationaleducationevidencefromnewzealand
_version_ 1726007217680809984