Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data

Although ethical guidelines for doing Internet research are available, most prominently those of the Association of Internet Researchers ( www.aoir.org ), ethical decision-making for research on publicly available, naturally-occurring data remains a major challenge. As researchers might also turn to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wyke Stommel, Lynn de Rijk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-07-01
Series:Research Ethics Review
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767
id doaj-1409bb9a1b904f43aa36852c78cd4397
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1409bb9a1b904f43aa36852c78cd43972021-07-19T21:33:49ZengSAGE PublishingResearch Ethics Review1747-01612047-60942021-07-011710.1177/1747016120988767Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online dataWyke StommelLynn de RijkAlthough ethical guidelines for doing Internet research are available, most prominently those of the Association of Internet Researchers ( www.aoir.org ), ethical decision-making for research on publicly available, naturally-occurring data remains a major challenge. As researchers might also turn to others to inform their decisions, this article reviews recent research papers on publicly available, online data. Research involving forums such as Facebook pages, Twitter, YouTube, news comments, blogs, etc. is examined to see how authors report ethical considerations and how they quote these data. We included 132 articles published in discourse analysis-oriented journals between January 2017 and February 2020. Roughly one third of the articles (85 out of 132) did not discuss ethical issues, mostly claiming the data were publicly available. Quotations nevertheless tended to be anonymized, although retrievability of posts was generally not taken into account. In those articles in which ethical concerns were reported, related decisions appeared to vary substantially. In most cases it was argued that informed consent was not required. Similarly, approval from research ethics committees was mostly regarded unnecessary. Other ethical issues like consideration of users’ expectations and intentions, freedom of choice, possible harm, sensitive topics, and vulnerable groups were rarely discussed in the articles. We argue for increased attention to ethical issues and legal aspects in discourse analytic articles involving online data beyond mentioning general concerns. Instead, we argue for more involvement of users/participants in ethical decision-making, for consideration of retrievability of posts and for a role for journal editors.https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wyke Stommel
Lynn de Rijk
spellingShingle Wyke Stommel
Lynn de Rijk
Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data
Research Ethics Review
author_facet Wyke Stommel
Lynn de Rijk
author_sort Wyke Stommel
title Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data
title_short Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data
title_full Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data
title_fullStr Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data
title_full_unstemmed Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data
title_sort ethical approval: none sought. how discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Research Ethics Review
issn 1747-0161
2047-6094
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Although ethical guidelines for doing Internet research are available, most prominently those of the Association of Internet Researchers ( www.aoir.org ), ethical decision-making for research on publicly available, naturally-occurring data remains a major challenge. As researchers might also turn to others to inform their decisions, this article reviews recent research papers on publicly available, online data. Research involving forums such as Facebook pages, Twitter, YouTube, news comments, blogs, etc. is examined to see how authors report ethical considerations and how they quote these data. We included 132 articles published in discourse analysis-oriented journals between January 2017 and February 2020. Roughly one third of the articles (85 out of 132) did not discuss ethical issues, mostly claiming the data were publicly available. Quotations nevertheless tended to be anonymized, although retrievability of posts was generally not taken into account. In those articles in which ethical concerns were reported, related decisions appeared to vary substantially. In most cases it was argued that informed consent was not required. Similarly, approval from research ethics committees was mostly regarded unnecessary. Other ethical issues like consideration of users’ expectations and intentions, freedom of choice, possible harm, sensitive topics, and vulnerable groups were rarely discussed in the articles. We argue for increased attention to ethical issues and legal aspects in discourse analytic articles involving online data beyond mentioning general concerns. Instead, we argue for more involvement of users/participants in ethical decision-making, for consideration of retrievability of posts and for a role for journal editors.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767
work_keys_str_mv AT wykestommel ethicalapprovalnonesoughthowdiscourseanalystsreportethicalissuesaroundpubliclyavailableonlinedata
AT lynnderijk ethicalapprovalnonesoughthowdiscourseanalystsreportethicalissuesaroundpubliclyavailableonlinedata
_version_ 1721294365971709952