Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature

Superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions were first described in 1985 by Andrews et al. and later classified into four types by Synder et al. The most prevalent is type II which is fraying of the superior glenoid labrum with detachment of the biceps anchor. Superior labrum anterior posterior (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xinning Li, Timothy Lin, Marcus Jager, Mark D. Price, Nicola Deangelis, Brian D. Busconi, Michael Brown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Medical Publishing 2010-02-01
Series:Orthopedic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/or/article/view/1371
id doaj-13d7369b862b435da45840faa05e09cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-13d7369b862b435da45840faa05e09cb2021-05-02T19:53:34ZengOpen Medical PublishingOrthopedic Reviews2035-82372035-81642010-02-0121e6e610.4081/or.2010.e61063Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literatureXinning Li0Timothy Lin1Marcus Jager2Mark D. Price3Nicola Deangelis4Brian D. Busconi5Michael Brown6University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MAUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MAUniversity of Duesseldorf Medical SchoolUniversity of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MAUniversity of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MAUniversity of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MAUniversity of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MASuperior labrum anterior and posterior lesions were first described in 1985 by Andrews et al. and later classified into four types by Synder et al. The most prevalent is type II which is fraying of the superior glenoid labrum with detachment of the biceps anchor. Superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions can also be associated with other shoulder pathology. Both MRI and MRA can be utilized in making the diagnosis with the coronal images being the most sensitive. The mechanism of injury can be either repetitive stress or acute trauma with the superior labrum most vulnerable to injury during the late cocking phase of throwing. A combination of the modified dynamic labral shear and O’Brien test can be used clinically in making the diagnosis of SLAP lesion. However, the most sensitive and specific test used to diagnosis specifically a type II SLAP lesion is the Biceps Load Test II. The management of type II SLAP lesions is controversial and dependent on patient characteristics. In the young high demanding overhead athlete, repair of the type II lesion is recommended to prevent glenohumeral instability. In middle-aged patients (age 25-45), repair of the type II SLAP lesion with concomitant treatment of other shoulder pathology resulted in better functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, patients who had a distinct traumatic event resulting in the type II SLAP tear did better functionally than patients who did not have the traumatic event when the lesion was repaired. In the older patient population (age over 45 years), minimum intervention (debridement, biceps tenodesis/tenotomy) to the type II SLAP lesion results in excellent patient satisfaction and outcomes.http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/or/article/view/1371SLAP LesionsType II, ManagementClassificationShoulder
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xinning Li
Timothy Lin
Marcus Jager
Mark D. Price
Nicola Deangelis
Brian D. Busconi
Michael Brown
spellingShingle Xinning Li
Timothy Lin
Marcus Jager
Mark D. Price
Nicola Deangelis
Brian D. Busconi
Michael Brown
Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature
Orthopedic Reviews
SLAP Lesions
Type II, Management
Classification
Shoulder
author_facet Xinning Li
Timothy Lin
Marcus Jager
Mark D. Price
Nicola Deangelis
Brian D. Busconi
Michael Brown
author_sort Xinning Li
title Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature
title_short Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature
title_full Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature
title_fullStr Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature
title_sort management of type ii superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature
publisher Open Medical Publishing
series Orthopedic Reviews
issn 2035-8237
2035-8164
publishDate 2010-02-01
description Superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions were first described in 1985 by Andrews et al. and later classified into four types by Synder et al. The most prevalent is type II which is fraying of the superior glenoid labrum with detachment of the biceps anchor. Superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions can also be associated with other shoulder pathology. Both MRI and MRA can be utilized in making the diagnosis with the coronal images being the most sensitive. The mechanism of injury can be either repetitive stress or acute trauma with the superior labrum most vulnerable to injury during the late cocking phase of throwing. A combination of the modified dynamic labral shear and O’Brien test can be used clinically in making the diagnosis of SLAP lesion. However, the most sensitive and specific test used to diagnosis specifically a type II SLAP lesion is the Biceps Load Test II. The management of type II SLAP lesions is controversial and dependent on patient characteristics. In the young high demanding overhead athlete, repair of the type II lesion is recommended to prevent glenohumeral instability. In middle-aged patients (age 25-45), repair of the type II SLAP lesion with concomitant treatment of other shoulder pathology resulted in better functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, patients who had a distinct traumatic event resulting in the type II SLAP tear did better functionally than patients who did not have the traumatic event when the lesion was repaired. In the older patient population (age over 45 years), minimum intervention (debridement, biceps tenodesis/tenotomy) to the type II SLAP lesion results in excellent patient satisfaction and outcomes.
topic SLAP Lesions
Type II, Management
Classification
Shoulder
url http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/or/article/view/1371
work_keys_str_mv AT xinningli managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature
AT timothylin managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature
AT marcusjager managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature
AT markdprice managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature
AT nicoladeangelis managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature
AT briandbusconi managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature
AT michaelbrown managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1721487840863322112