Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature
Superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions were first described in 1985 by Andrews et al. and later classified into four types by Synder et al. The most prevalent is type II which is fraying of the superior glenoid labrum with detachment of the biceps anchor. Superior labrum anterior posterior (...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Medical Publishing
2010-02-01
|
Series: | Orthopedic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/or/article/view/1371 |
id |
doaj-13d7369b862b435da45840faa05e09cb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-13d7369b862b435da45840faa05e09cb2021-05-02T19:53:34ZengOpen Medical PublishingOrthopedic Reviews2035-82372035-81642010-02-0121e6e610.4081/or.2010.e61063Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literatureXinning Li0Timothy Lin1Marcus Jager2Mark D. Price3Nicola Deangelis4Brian D. Busconi5Michael Brown6University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MAUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MAUniversity of Duesseldorf Medical SchoolUniversity of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MAUniversity of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MAUniversity of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MAUniversity of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MASuperior labrum anterior and posterior lesions were first described in 1985 by Andrews et al. and later classified into four types by Synder et al. The most prevalent is type II which is fraying of the superior glenoid labrum with detachment of the biceps anchor. Superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions can also be associated with other shoulder pathology. Both MRI and MRA can be utilized in making the diagnosis with the coronal images being the most sensitive. The mechanism of injury can be either repetitive stress or acute trauma with the superior labrum most vulnerable to injury during the late cocking phase of throwing. A combination of the modified dynamic labral shear and O’Brien test can be used clinically in making the diagnosis of SLAP lesion. However, the most sensitive and specific test used to diagnosis specifically a type II SLAP lesion is the Biceps Load Test II. The management of type II SLAP lesions is controversial and dependent on patient characteristics. In the young high demanding overhead athlete, repair of the type II lesion is recommended to prevent glenohumeral instability. In middle-aged patients (age 25-45), repair of the type II SLAP lesion with concomitant treatment of other shoulder pathology resulted in better functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, patients who had a distinct traumatic event resulting in the type II SLAP tear did better functionally than patients who did not have the traumatic event when the lesion was repaired. In the older patient population (age over 45 years), minimum intervention (debridement, biceps tenodesis/tenotomy) to the type II SLAP lesion results in excellent patient satisfaction and outcomes.http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/or/article/view/1371SLAP LesionsType II, ManagementClassificationShoulder |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xinning Li Timothy Lin Marcus Jager Mark D. Price Nicola Deangelis Brian D. Busconi Michael Brown |
spellingShingle |
Xinning Li Timothy Lin Marcus Jager Mark D. Price Nicola Deangelis Brian D. Busconi Michael Brown Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature Orthopedic Reviews SLAP Lesions Type II, Management Classification Shoulder |
author_facet |
Xinning Li Timothy Lin Marcus Jager Mark D. Price Nicola Deangelis Brian D. Busconi Michael Brown |
author_sort |
Xinning Li |
title |
Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature |
title_short |
Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature |
title_full |
Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature |
title_fullStr |
Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature |
title_sort |
management of type ii superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature |
publisher |
Open Medical Publishing |
series |
Orthopedic Reviews |
issn |
2035-8237 2035-8164 |
publishDate |
2010-02-01 |
description |
Superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions were first described in 1985 by Andrews et al. and later classified into four types by Synder et al. The most prevalent is type II which is fraying of the superior glenoid labrum with detachment of the biceps anchor. Superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions can also be associated with other shoulder pathology. Both MRI and MRA can be utilized in making the diagnosis with the coronal images being the most sensitive. The mechanism of injury can be either repetitive stress or acute trauma with the superior labrum most vulnerable to injury during the late cocking phase of throwing. A combination of the modified dynamic labral shear and O’Brien test can be used clinically in making the diagnosis of SLAP lesion. However, the most sensitive and specific test used to diagnosis specifically a type II SLAP lesion is the Biceps Load Test II. The management of type II SLAP lesions is controversial and dependent on patient characteristics. In the young high demanding overhead athlete, repair of the type II lesion is recommended to prevent glenohumeral instability. In middle-aged patients (age 25-45), repair of the type II SLAP lesion with concomitant treatment of other shoulder pathology resulted in better functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, patients who had a distinct traumatic event resulting in the type II SLAP tear did better functionally than patients who did not have the traumatic event when the lesion was repaired. In the older patient population (age over 45 years), minimum intervention (debridement, biceps tenodesis/tenotomy) to the type II SLAP lesion results in excellent patient satisfaction and outcomes. |
topic |
SLAP Lesions Type II, Management Classification Shoulder |
url |
http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/or/article/view/1371 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xinningli managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature AT timothylin managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature AT marcusjager managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature AT markdprice managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature AT nicoladeangelis managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature AT briandbusconi managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature AT michaelbrown managementoftypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriorposteriorlesionsareviewoftheliterature |
_version_ |
1721487840863322112 |