Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review
It was our objective to identify the psychometric elements to an epistemological reflection through a systematic review of cross-cultural validation procedures of TGMD-2 batteries, MABC-2 and KTK. Searches were carried out by two evaluators independently without year and language restrictions in six...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Desafio Singular
2017-03-01
|
Series: | Motricidade |
Online Access: | http://revistas.rcaap.pt/motricidade/article/view/6397 |
id |
doaj-13d6450f7c074735b5fd86f96337a68d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-13d6450f7c074735b5fd86f96337a68d2020-11-24T20:42:04ZengDesafio SingularMotricidade 1646-107X2182-29722017-03-01123647510.6063/motricidade.63977248Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic reviewPâmella de Medeiros0Marcela Almeida Zequinão1Fernanda Cerveira Fronza2João Otacilio Libardoni dos Santos3Fernando Luiz Cardoso4Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina - UDESCUniversidade do MinhoUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina-UDESCUniversidade Federal do Amazonas - UFAMUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina-UDESCIt was our objective to identify the psychometric elements to an epistemological reflection through a systematic review of cross-cultural validation procedures of TGMD-2 batteries, MABC-2 and KTK. Searches were carried out by two evaluators independently without year and language restrictions in six databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, Lilacs, Scopus, Pubmed and The ScientificElectronic Library Online - SciELO. The key words used were: "MABC", "TGMD" and "KTK" all of them combined with the word "validity". There was a total of 734 articles, of which, after the exclusion criteria, remained only 11 studies. It was found that there are differences between the authors in relation to the psychometric factors taken into account in cross-cultural validation. So that there was a lack of unanimity of the validation criteria of all studies in this field.http://revistas.rcaap.pt/motricidade/article/view/6397 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pâmella de Medeiros Marcela Almeida Zequinão Fernanda Cerveira Fronza João Otacilio Libardoni dos Santos Fernando Luiz Cardoso |
spellingShingle |
Pâmella de Medeiros Marcela Almeida Zequinão Fernanda Cerveira Fronza João Otacilio Libardoni dos Santos Fernando Luiz Cardoso Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review Motricidade |
author_facet |
Pâmella de Medeiros Marcela Almeida Zequinão Fernanda Cerveira Fronza João Otacilio Libardoni dos Santos Fernando Luiz Cardoso |
author_sort |
Pâmella de Medeiros |
title |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review |
title_short |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review |
title_full |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review |
title_sort |
motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: a systematic review |
publisher |
Desafio Singular |
series |
Motricidade |
issn |
1646-107X 2182-2972 |
publishDate |
2017-03-01 |
description |
It was our objective to identify the psychometric elements to an epistemological reflection through a systematic review of cross-cultural validation procedures of TGMD-2 batteries, MABC-2 and KTK. Searches were carried out by two evaluators independently without year and language restrictions in six databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, Lilacs, Scopus, Pubmed and The ScientificElectronic Library Online - SciELO. The key words used were: "MABC", "TGMD" and "KTK" all of them combined with the word "validity". There was a total of 734 articles, of which, after the exclusion criteria, remained only 11 studies. It was found that there are differences between the authors in relation to the psychometric factors taken into account in cross-cultural validation. So that there was a lack of unanimity of the validation criteria of all studies in this field. |
url |
http://revistas.rcaap.pt/motricidade/article/view/6397 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pamellademedeiros motorassessmentinstrumentsandpsychometricproceduresasystematicreview AT marcelaalmeidazequinao motorassessmentinstrumentsandpsychometricproceduresasystematicreview AT fernandacerveirafronza motorassessmentinstrumentsandpsychometricproceduresasystematicreview AT joaootaciliolibardonidossantos motorassessmentinstrumentsandpsychometricproceduresasystematicreview AT fernandoluizcardoso motorassessmentinstrumentsandpsychometricproceduresasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1716823372554305536 |