Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review

It was our objective to identify the psychometric elements to an epistemological reflection through a systematic review of cross-cultural validation procedures of TGMD-2 batteries, MABC-2 and KTK. Searches were carried out by two evaluators independently without year and language restrictions in six...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pâmella de Medeiros, Marcela Almeida Zequinão, Fernanda Cerveira Fronza, João Otacilio Libardoni dos Santos, Fernando Luiz Cardoso
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Desafio Singular 2017-03-01
Series:Motricidade
Online Access:http://revistas.rcaap.pt/motricidade/article/view/6397
id doaj-13d6450f7c074735b5fd86f96337a68d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-13d6450f7c074735b5fd86f96337a68d2020-11-24T20:42:04ZengDesafio SingularMotricidade 1646-107X2182-29722017-03-01123647510.6063/motricidade.63977248Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic reviewPâmella de Medeiros0Marcela Almeida Zequinão1Fernanda Cerveira Fronza2João Otacilio Libardoni dos Santos3Fernando Luiz Cardoso4Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina - UDESCUniversidade do MinhoUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina-UDESCUniversidade Federal do Amazonas - UFAMUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina-UDESCIt was our objective to identify the psychometric elements to an epistemological reflection through a systematic review of cross-cultural validation procedures of TGMD-2 batteries, MABC-2 and KTK. Searches were carried out by two evaluators independently without year and language restrictions in six databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, Lilacs, Scopus, Pubmed and The ScientificElectronic Library Online - SciELO. The key words used were: "MABC", "TGMD" and "KTK" all of them combined with the word "validity". There was a total of 734 articles, of which, after the exclusion criteria, remained only 11 studies. It was found that there are differences between the authors in relation to the psychometric factors taken into account in cross-cultural validation. So that there was a lack of unanimity of the validation criteria of all studies in this field.http://revistas.rcaap.pt/motricidade/article/view/6397
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pâmella de Medeiros
Marcela Almeida Zequinão
Fernanda Cerveira Fronza
João Otacilio Libardoni dos Santos
Fernando Luiz Cardoso
spellingShingle Pâmella de Medeiros
Marcela Almeida Zequinão
Fernanda Cerveira Fronza
João Otacilio Libardoni dos Santos
Fernando Luiz Cardoso
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review
Motricidade
author_facet Pâmella de Medeiros
Marcela Almeida Zequinão
Fernanda Cerveira Fronza
João Otacilio Libardoni dos Santos
Fernando Luiz Cardoso
author_sort Pâmella de Medeiros
title Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review
title_short Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review
title_full Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review
title_fullStr Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review
title_sort motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: a systematic review
publisher Desafio Singular
series Motricidade
issn 1646-107X
2182-2972
publishDate 2017-03-01
description It was our objective to identify the psychometric elements to an epistemological reflection through a systematic review of cross-cultural validation procedures of TGMD-2 batteries, MABC-2 and KTK. Searches were carried out by two evaluators independently without year and language restrictions in six databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, Lilacs, Scopus, Pubmed and The ScientificElectronic Library Online - SciELO. The key words used were: "MABC", "TGMD" and "KTK" all of them combined with the word "validity". There was a total of 734 articles, of which, after the exclusion criteria, remained only 11 studies. It was found that there are differences between the authors in relation to the psychometric factors taken into account in cross-cultural validation. So that there was a lack of unanimity of the validation criteria of all studies in this field.
url http://revistas.rcaap.pt/motricidade/article/view/6397
work_keys_str_mv AT pamellademedeiros motorassessmentinstrumentsandpsychometricproceduresasystematicreview
AT marcelaalmeidazequinao motorassessmentinstrumentsandpsychometricproceduresasystematicreview
AT fernandacerveirafronza motorassessmentinstrumentsandpsychometricproceduresasystematicreview
AT joaootaciliolibardonidossantos motorassessmentinstrumentsandpsychometricproceduresasystematicreview
AT fernandoluizcardoso motorassessmentinstrumentsandpsychometricproceduresasystematicreview
_version_ 1716823372554305536