Energy Expenditure of a Single Sit-to-Stand Movement with Slow Versus Normal Speed Using the Different Frequency Accumulation Method

<i>Background and objectives:</i> The purpose of this study was to compare the energy expenditures (EE) of a single sit-to-stand (STS) movements with slow and normal speeds using a multi-stage exercise test. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> Twelve young males, aged 21&#8211;...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takashi Nakagata, Yosuke Yamada, Yoichi Hatamoto, Hisashi Naito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/55/3/77
id doaj-13cf2caa4dd143b0bfecdfb87652413a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-13cf2caa4dd143b0bfecdfb87652413a2020-11-25T01:12:21ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X2019-03-015537710.3390/medicina55030077medicina55030077Energy Expenditure of a Single Sit-to-Stand Movement with Slow Versus Normal Speed Using the Different Frequency Accumulation MethodTakashi Nakagata0Yosuke Yamada1Yoichi Hatamoto2Hisashi Naito3Faculty of Health and Sports Science, Juntendo University, Hiraka-gakuendai 1-1, Inzai, Chiba 270-1695, JapanNational Institute of Health and Nutrition, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, 1-23-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8636, JapanNational Institute of Health and Nutrition, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, 1-23-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8636, JapanFaculty of Health and Sports Science, Juntendo University, Hiraka-gakuendai 1-1, Inzai, Chiba 270-1695, Japan<i>Background and objectives:</i> The purpose of this study was to compare the energy expenditures (EE) of a single sit-to-stand (STS) movements with slow and normal speeds using a multi-stage exercise test. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> Twelve young males, aged 21&#8211;27 years (age, 23.0 &#177; 1.7 years; height, 171.2 &#177; 6.1 cm; weight, 64.3 &#177; 5.6 kg), performed repeated 3-s stand-up and 3-s sit-down (slow) or 1-s stand-up and 1-s sit-down (normal) movement on two different days with random order. All the participants completed multi-stage tests at different STS frequencies per minute. The slope and intercept of the linear regression relationship between the EE (kcal/min) and the STS frequency were obtained, and the slope of the regression was quantified as the EE of an STS. <i>Results:</i> The metabolic equivalents (METs) of the STS-slow was 4.5 METs for the frequency of 10 times/min (in total 1 min), and the net EE was 5.00 &#177; 1.2 kcal/min. The net EE of the STS-slow was 0.37 &#177; 0.12 kcal, which was significantly greater than that during the STS-normal (0.26 &#177; 0.06 kcal). The difference between the EEs of the STS-slow and STS-normal was significantly greater in taller and heavier subjects. <i>Conclusions:</i> We concluded that the intensity of STS-slow movement is moderate, and the EE during an STS-slow (0.37 &#177; 0.12 kcal) is higher than that during an STS-normal (0.26 &#177; 0.06 kcal). Our study results will help exercise and/or health professionals prescribe physical activity programs using STS movement for healthy young population groups.https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/55/3/77sedentary breaknon-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT)stand uphealth promotionpopulation strategyweight controlenergy costhome-based exercise
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Takashi Nakagata
Yosuke Yamada
Yoichi Hatamoto
Hisashi Naito
spellingShingle Takashi Nakagata
Yosuke Yamada
Yoichi Hatamoto
Hisashi Naito
Energy Expenditure of a Single Sit-to-Stand Movement with Slow Versus Normal Speed Using the Different Frequency Accumulation Method
Medicina
sedentary break
non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT)
stand up
health promotion
population strategy
weight control
energy cost
home-based exercise
author_facet Takashi Nakagata
Yosuke Yamada
Yoichi Hatamoto
Hisashi Naito
author_sort Takashi Nakagata
title Energy Expenditure of a Single Sit-to-Stand Movement with Slow Versus Normal Speed Using the Different Frequency Accumulation Method
title_short Energy Expenditure of a Single Sit-to-Stand Movement with Slow Versus Normal Speed Using the Different Frequency Accumulation Method
title_full Energy Expenditure of a Single Sit-to-Stand Movement with Slow Versus Normal Speed Using the Different Frequency Accumulation Method
title_fullStr Energy Expenditure of a Single Sit-to-Stand Movement with Slow Versus Normal Speed Using the Different Frequency Accumulation Method
title_full_unstemmed Energy Expenditure of a Single Sit-to-Stand Movement with Slow Versus Normal Speed Using the Different Frequency Accumulation Method
title_sort energy expenditure of a single sit-to-stand movement with slow versus normal speed using the different frequency accumulation method
publisher MDPI AG
series Medicina
issn 1010-660X
publishDate 2019-03-01
description <i>Background and objectives:</i> The purpose of this study was to compare the energy expenditures (EE) of a single sit-to-stand (STS) movements with slow and normal speeds using a multi-stage exercise test. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> Twelve young males, aged 21&#8211;27 years (age, 23.0 &#177; 1.7 years; height, 171.2 &#177; 6.1 cm; weight, 64.3 &#177; 5.6 kg), performed repeated 3-s stand-up and 3-s sit-down (slow) or 1-s stand-up and 1-s sit-down (normal) movement on two different days with random order. All the participants completed multi-stage tests at different STS frequencies per minute. The slope and intercept of the linear regression relationship between the EE (kcal/min) and the STS frequency were obtained, and the slope of the regression was quantified as the EE of an STS. <i>Results:</i> The metabolic equivalents (METs) of the STS-slow was 4.5 METs for the frequency of 10 times/min (in total 1 min), and the net EE was 5.00 &#177; 1.2 kcal/min. The net EE of the STS-slow was 0.37 &#177; 0.12 kcal, which was significantly greater than that during the STS-normal (0.26 &#177; 0.06 kcal). The difference between the EEs of the STS-slow and STS-normal was significantly greater in taller and heavier subjects. <i>Conclusions:</i> We concluded that the intensity of STS-slow movement is moderate, and the EE during an STS-slow (0.37 &#177; 0.12 kcal) is higher than that during an STS-normal (0.26 &#177; 0.06 kcal). Our study results will help exercise and/or health professionals prescribe physical activity programs using STS movement for healthy young population groups.
topic sedentary break
non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT)
stand up
health promotion
population strategy
weight control
energy cost
home-based exercise
url https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/55/3/77
work_keys_str_mv AT takashinakagata energyexpenditureofasinglesittostandmovementwithslowversusnormalspeedusingthedifferentfrequencyaccumulationmethod
AT yosukeyamada energyexpenditureofasinglesittostandmovementwithslowversusnormalspeedusingthedifferentfrequencyaccumulationmethod
AT yoichihatamoto energyexpenditureofasinglesittostandmovementwithslowversusnormalspeedusingthedifferentfrequencyaccumulationmethod
AT hisashinaito energyexpenditureofasinglesittostandmovementwithslowversusnormalspeedusingthedifferentfrequencyaccumulationmethod
_version_ 1725166976235470848