Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants

This paper examines not only the effectiveness of the South Korean emissions-trading scheme (ETS), but also the determinants of its performance. We apply a directional distance function and stochastic frontier analysis method to estimate environmental efficiency and the marginal CO<sub>2</s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yongrok Choi, Chao Qi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
ETS
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2504
id doaj-13ca28818e4447a8a4332379c2772635
record_format Article
spelling doaj-13ca28818e4447a8a4332379c27726352020-11-25T01:23:18ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-04-01119250410.3390/su11092504su11092504Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power PlantsYongrok Choi0Chao Qi1Global E-governance Program, Inha University, Inharo100, Nam-gu, Incheon 402-751, KoreaGlobal E-governance Program, Inha University, Inharo100, Nam-gu, Incheon 402-751, KoreaThis paper examines not only the effectiveness of the South Korean emissions-trading scheme (ETS), but also the determinants of its performance. We apply a directional distance function and stochastic frontier analysis method to estimate environmental efficiency and the marginal CO<sub>2</sub> abatement costs for 50 coal-fueled power plants from 2008 to 2016. The result indicates that the efficiency differs between the Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye administration periods, with performance in the former period being relatively more effective than in the latter. Meanwhile, there were price gaps of 57.98% and 72.76% in 2015 and 2016, respectively, between the realized carbon market price and our result, indicating significant suppressed pressure on the market. We conclude that the Korean government should strengthen its regulations to more effectively implement a green economy. Policymakers could impose a carbon tax; substantially decrease the carbon emissions-free quota; and provide more incentives, especially to the energy-intensive, resource-saving coal-fueled power plants. This would ultimately keep market prices within a reasonable range and achieve a balance between the supply and demand for carbon emission allowances in the market.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2504coal-fueled power plantmarginal abatement costefficiencyETSKoreastochastic frontier analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yongrok Choi
Chao Qi
spellingShingle Yongrok Choi
Chao Qi
Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants
Sustainability
coal-fueled power plant
marginal abatement cost
efficiency
ETS
Korea
stochastic frontier analysis
author_facet Yongrok Choi
Chao Qi
author_sort Yongrok Choi
title Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants
title_short Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants
title_full Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants
title_fullStr Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants
title_full_unstemmed Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants
title_sort is south korea’s emission trading scheme effective? an analysis based on the marginal abatement cost of coal-fueled power plants
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-04-01
description This paper examines not only the effectiveness of the South Korean emissions-trading scheme (ETS), but also the determinants of its performance. We apply a directional distance function and stochastic frontier analysis method to estimate environmental efficiency and the marginal CO<sub>2</sub> abatement costs for 50 coal-fueled power plants from 2008 to 2016. The result indicates that the efficiency differs between the Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye administration periods, with performance in the former period being relatively more effective than in the latter. Meanwhile, there were price gaps of 57.98% and 72.76% in 2015 and 2016, respectively, between the realized carbon market price and our result, indicating significant suppressed pressure on the market. We conclude that the Korean government should strengthen its regulations to more effectively implement a green economy. Policymakers could impose a carbon tax; substantially decrease the carbon emissions-free quota; and provide more incentives, especially to the energy-intensive, resource-saving coal-fueled power plants. This would ultimately keep market prices within a reasonable range and achieve a balance between the supply and demand for carbon emission allowances in the market.
topic coal-fueled power plant
marginal abatement cost
efficiency
ETS
Korea
stochastic frontier analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2504
work_keys_str_mv AT yongrokchoi issouthkoreasemissiontradingschemeeffectiveananalysisbasedonthemarginalabatementcostofcoalfueledpowerplants
AT chaoqi issouthkoreasemissiontradingschemeeffectiveananalysisbasedonthemarginalabatementcostofcoalfueledpowerplants
_version_ 1725123183145648128