Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants
This paper examines not only the effectiveness of the South Korean emissions-trading scheme (ETS), but also the determinants of its performance. We apply a directional distance function and stochastic frontier analysis method to estimate environmental efficiency and the marginal CO<sub>2</s...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2504 |
id |
doaj-13ca28818e4447a8a4332379c2772635 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-13ca28818e4447a8a4332379c27726352020-11-25T01:23:18ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-04-01119250410.3390/su11092504su11092504Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power PlantsYongrok Choi0Chao Qi1Global E-governance Program, Inha University, Inharo100, Nam-gu, Incheon 402-751, KoreaGlobal E-governance Program, Inha University, Inharo100, Nam-gu, Incheon 402-751, KoreaThis paper examines not only the effectiveness of the South Korean emissions-trading scheme (ETS), but also the determinants of its performance. We apply a directional distance function and stochastic frontier analysis method to estimate environmental efficiency and the marginal CO<sub>2</sub> abatement costs for 50 coal-fueled power plants from 2008 to 2016. The result indicates that the efficiency differs between the Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye administration periods, with performance in the former period being relatively more effective than in the latter. Meanwhile, there were price gaps of 57.98% and 72.76% in 2015 and 2016, respectively, between the realized carbon market price and our result, indicating significant suppressed pressure on the market. We conclude that the Korean government should strengthen its regulations to more effectively implement a green economy. Policymakers could impose a carbon tax; substantially decrease the carbon emissions-free quota; and provide more incentives, especially to the energy-intensive, resource-saving coal-fueled power plants. This would ultimately keep market prices within a reasonable range and achieve a balance between the supply and demand for carbon emission allowances in the market.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2504coal-fueled power plantmarginal abatement costefficiencyETSKoreastochastic frontier analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yongrok Choi Chao Qi |
spellingShingle |
Yongrok Choi Chao Qi Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants Sustainability coal-fueled power plant marginal abatement cost efficiency ETS Korea stochastic frontier analysis |
author_facet |
Yongrok Choi Chao Qi |
author_sort |
Yongrok Choi |
title |
Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants |
title_short |
Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants |
title_full |
Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants |
title_fullStr |
Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is South Korea’s Emission Trading Scheme Effective? An Analysis Based on the Marginal Abatement Cost of Coal-Fueled Power Plants |
title_sort |
is south korea’s emission trading scheme effective? an analysis based on the marginal abatement cost of coal-fueled power plants |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
This paper examines not only the effectiveness of the South Korean emissions-trading scheme (ETS), but also the determinants of its performance. We apply a directional distance function and stochastic frontier analysis method to estimate environmental efficiency and the marginal CO<sub>2</sub> abatement costs for 50 coal-fueled power plants from 2008 to 2016. The result indicates that the efficiency differs between the Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye administration periods, with performance in the former period being relatively more effective than in the latter. Meanwhile, there were price gaps of 57.98% and 72.76% in 2015 and 2016, respectively, between the realized carbon market price and our result, indicating significant suppressed pressure on the market. We conclude that the Korean government should strengthen its regulations to more effectively implement a green economy. Policymakers could impose a carbon tax; substantially decrease the carbon emissions-free quota; and provide more incentives, especially to the energy-intensive, resource-saving coal-fueled power plants. This would ultimately keep market prices within a reasonable range and achieve a balance between the supply and demand for carbon emission allowances in the market. |
topic |
coal-fueled power plant marginal abatement cost efficiency ETS Korea stochastic frontier analysis |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2504 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yongrokchoi issouthkoreasemissiontradingschemeeffectiveananalysisbasedonthemarginalabatementcostofcoalfueledpowerplants AT chaoqi issouthkoreasemissiontradingschemeeffectiveananalysisbasedonthemarginalabatementcostofcoalfueledpowerplants |
_version_ |
1725123183145648128 |