Actualization and Deactualization in Art Studies

• Main Author: Anna Troitskaya
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Rosenberg & Sellier 2018-04-01
• Series: Rivista di Estetica
• Subjects: art theory; Russian Institute of Art History; actualization; deactualization; cultural exclusion zones
• Online Access: http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/2687

What is a national theoretical tradition in art history? Description of the history of art theory is based on the experience of the Russian Institute of Art History (The Zubov Institute), which was founded as a private educational institution and became a center of art studies. In fact, art theory and art history was actualized in Russia largely thanks to the Institute of Art History. Valentin Zubov and his colleagues had introduced a new viewpoint on the history of art as an important and independent science with its specific place in Russian humanities. On the example of the Institute we examine the change of attitude to the science about art in the 1920-1930s, mostly under ideological pressure. The paperscrutinizes the process of actualization of a new branch of knowledge and its deactualization in the time when sociological method and Marxist theory became the basis for Soviet art studies. Thereby deactualization makes a non-ideological art theory one of cultural exclusion zones. Chang of scientific pragmatism in the field of art studies transforms its grammar and, in fact, destroys art studies themselves.