Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries
The article aims to examine one of the elements of the formal mechanism of maintaining court practice unity in criminal proceedings of Ukraine and European countries – referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court. Similar to the Ukrainian criminal procedure legislation, the grounds...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
VD Dakor
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Access to Justice in Eastern Europe |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ajee-journal.com/upload/attaches/att_1614524446.pdf |
id |
doaj-13c5fdddb501470abbcf124414c1fb47 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-13c5fdddb501470abbcf124414c1fb472021-03-10T16:59:04ZengVD DakorAccess to Justice in Eastern Europe2663-05752663-05832021-03-014114316510.33327/AJEE-18-4.1-a000050Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countriesNazar Bobechko0Alona Voinarovych 1Volodymyr Fihurskyi2Ivan Franko National University of LvivIvan Franko National University of LvivIvan Franko National University of LviThe article aims to examine one of the elements of the formal mechanism of maintaining court practice unity in criminal proceedings of Ukraine and European countries – referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court. Similar to the Ukrainian criminal procedure legislation, the grounds for referring a criminal case and the procedure of its application are provided in the legislation of Estonia, Italy and Lithuania. At the same time, the Ukrainian legislator has established a number of special features, however, the wording of the relevant articles of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine is not perfect. The article provides answers to such questions as how forceful the provisions of criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine are, to what extent of effectiveness the Supreme Court exercises its legal authority regarding the unity of court practice in criminal proceedings, and whether the controversies in legal positions of the structural divisions of the Supreme Court have been successfully avoided. In order to achieve the stated aims, parts 2 and 3 are devoted to the examination of the grounds for referring a case in criminal proceedings of Ukraine and European countries. Part 4 outlines the shortcomings of the content of some articles of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine concerning the procedure of the referral of a criminal case to the highest division of the Supreme Court. Part 5 provides the analysis of the validity of decisions made by the boards of judges at the Supreme Court on the referral of criminal proceedings to its higher judicial divisions – the joint chamber of the Criminal Cassation Court and the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court. On the basis of the study of the judgements of boards, the judicial chambers of the Criminal Cassation Court and the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, in part 6 the question is answered on whether the Supreme Court of Ukraine managed to perform its duty on the assurance of court practice unity in such an area as criminal proceedings.http://ajee-journal.com/upload/attaches/att_1614524446.pdfexclusive legal problemdevelopment of lawformation of uniform law enforcement practicethe supreme courtcriminal proceedingsukraine |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nazar Bobechko Alona Voinarovych Volodymyr Fihurskyi |
spellingShingle |
Nazar Bobechko Alona Voinarovych Volodymyr Fihurskyi Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries Access to Justice in Eastern Europe exclusive legal problem development of law formation of uniform law enforcement practice the supreme court criminal proceedings ukraine |
author_facet |
Nazar Bobechko Alona Voinarovych Volodymyr Fihurskyi |
author_sort |
Nazar Bobechko |
title |
Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries |
title_short |
Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries |
title_full |
Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries |
title_fullStr |
Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries |
title_sort |
referring a case to the highest division of the supreme court in the criminal procedure legislation of ukraine and european countries |
publisher |
VD Dakor |
series |
Access to Justice in Eastern Europe |
issn |
2663-0575 2663-0583 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
The article aims to examine one of the elements of the formal mechanism of maintaining court practice unity in criminal proceedings of Ukraine and European countries – referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court. Similar to the Ukrainian criminal procedure legislation, the grounds for referring a criminal
case and the procedure of its application are provided in the legislation of Estonia, Italy and Lithuania. At the same time, the Ukrainian legislator has established a number of special features, however, the wording of the relevant articles of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine is not perfect. The article provides answers to such questions as how forceful the provisions of criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine are, to what extent of effectiveness the Supreme Court exercises its legal authority regarding the unity of court practice in criminal proceedings, and whether the controversies in legal positions of the structural divisions of the Supreme Court have been successfully avoided.
In order to achieve the stated aims, parts 2 and 3 are devoted to the examination of the grounds for referring a case in criminal proceedings of Ukraine and European countries. Part 4 outlines the shortcomings of the content of some articles of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine concerning the procedure of the referral of a criminal case to the highest division of the Supreme Court. Part 5 provides the analysis of the validity of decisions made by the boards of judges at the Supreme Court on the referral of criminal proceedings to its higher judicial divisions – the joint chamber of the Criminal Cassation Court and the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court. On the basis of the study of the judgements of boards, the judicial chambers of the Criminal Cassation Court and the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, in part 6 the question is answered on whether the Supreme Court of Ukraine managed to perform its duty on the assurance of court practice unity in such an area as criminal proceedings. |
topic |
exclusive legal problem development of law formation of uniform law enforcement practice the supreme court criminal proceedings ukraine |
url |
http://ajee-journal.com/upload/attaches/att_1614524446.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nazarbobechko referringacasetothehighestdivisionofthesupremecourtinthecriminalprocedurelegislationofukraineandeuropeancountries AT alonavoinarovych referringacasetothehighestdivisionofthesupremecourtinthecriminalprocedurelegislationofukraineandeuropeancountries AT volodymyrfihurskyi referringacasetothehighestdivisionofthesupremecourtinthecriminalprocedurelegislationofukraineandeuropeancountries |
_version_ |
1724226535571849216 |