Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries

The article aims to examine one of the elements of the formal mechanism of maintaining court practice unity in criminal proceedings of Ukraine and European countries – referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court. Similar to the Ukrainian criminal procedure legislation, the grounds...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nazar Bobechko, Alona Voinarovych, Volodymyr Fihurskyi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: VD Dakor 2021-03-01
Series:Access to Justice in Eastern Europe
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ajee-journal.com/upload/attaches/att_1614524446.pdf
id doaj-13c5fdddb501470abbcf124414c1fb47
record_format Article
spelling doaj-13c5fdddb501470abbcf124414c1fb472021-03-10T16:59:04ZengVD DakorAccess to Justice in Eastern Europe2663-05752663-05832021-03-014114316510.33327/AJEE-18-4.1-a000050Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countriesNazar Bobechko0Alona Voinarovych 1Volodymyr Fihurskyi2Ivan Franko National University of LvivIvan Franko National University of LvivIvan Franko National University of LviThe article aims to examine one of the elements of the formal mechanism of maintaining court practice unity in criminal proceedings of Ukraine and European countries – referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court. Similar to the Ukrainian criminal procedure legislation, the grounds for referring a criminal case and the procedure of its application are provided in the legislation of Estonia, Italy and Lithuania. At the same time, the Ukrainian legislator has established a number of special features, however, the wording of the relevant articles of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine is not perfect. The article provides answers to such questions as how forceful the provisions of criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine are, to what extent of effectiveness the Supreme Court exercises its legal authority regarding the unity of court practice in criminal proceedings, and whether the controversies in legal positions of the structural divisions of the Supreme Court have been successfully avoided. In order to achieve the stated aims, parts 2 and 3 are devoted to the examination of the grounds for referring a case in criminal proceedings of Ukraine and European countries. Part 4 outlines the shortcomings of the content of some articles of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine concerning the procedure of the referral of a criminal case to the highest division of the Supreme Court. Part 5 provides the analysis of the validity of decisions made by the boards of judges at the Supreme Court on the referral of criminal proceedings to its higher judicial divisions – the joint chamber of the Criminal Cassation Court and the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court. On the basis of the study of the judgements of boards, the judicial chambers of the Criminal Cassation Court and the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, in part 6 the question is answered on whether the Supreme Court of Ukraine managed to perform its duty on the assurance of court practice unity in such an area as criminal proceedings.http://ajee-journal.com/upload/attaches/att_1614524446.pdfexclusive legal problemdevelopment of lawformation of uniform law enforcement practicethe supreme courtcriminal proceedingsukraine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nazar Bobechko
Alona Voinarovych
Volodymyr Fihurskyi
spellingShingle Nazar Bobechko
Alona Voinarovych
Volodymyr Fihurskyi
Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries
Access to Justice in Eastern Europe
exclusive legal problem
development of law
formation of uniform law enforcement practice
the supreme court
criminal proceedings
ukraine
author_facet Nazar Bobechko
Alona Voinarovych
Volodymyr Fihurskyi
author_sort Nazar Bobechko
title Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries
title_short Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries
title_full Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries
title_fullStr Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries
title_full_unstemmed Referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and European countries
title_sort referring a case to the highest division of the supreme court in the criminal procedure legislation of ukraine and european countries
publisher VD Dakor
series Access to Justice in Eastern Europe
issn 2663-0575
2663-0583
publishDate 2021-03-01
description The article aims to examine one of the elements of the formal mechanism of maintaining court practice unity in criminal proceedings of Ukraine and European countries – referring a case to the highest division of the Supreme Court. Similar to the Ukrainian criminal procedure legislation, the grounds for referring a criminal case and the procedure of its application are provided in the legislation of Estonia, Italy and Lithuania. At the same time, the Ukrainian legislator has established a number of special features, however, the wording of the relevant articles of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine is not perfect. The article provides answers to such questions as how forceful the provisions of criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine are, to what extent of effectiveness the Supreme Court exercises its legal authority regarding the unity of court practice in criminal proceedings, and whether the controversies in legal positions of the structural divisions of the Supreme Court have been successfully avoided. In order to achieve the stated aims, parts 2 and 3 are devoted to the examination of the grounds for referring a case in criminal proceedings of Ukraine and European countries. Part 4 outlines the shortcomings of the content of some articles of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine concerning the procedure of the referral of a criminal case to the highest division of the Supreme Court. Part 5 provides the analysis of the validity of decisions made by the boards of judges at the Supreme Court on the referral of criminal proceedings to its higher judicial divisions – the joint chamber of the Criminal Cassation Court and the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court. On the basis of the study of the judgements of boards, the judicial chambers of the Criminal Cassation Court and the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, in part 6 the question is answered on whether the Supreme Court of Ukraine managed to perform its duty on the assurance of court practice unity in such an area as criminal proceedings.
topic exclusive legal problem
development of law
formation of uniform law enforcement practice
the supreme court
criminal proceedings
ukraine
url http://ajee-journal.com/upload/attaches/att_1614524446.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nazarbobechko referringacasetothehighestdivisionofthesupremecourtinthecriminalprocedurelegislationofukraineandeuropeancountries
AT alonavoinarovych referringacasetothehighestdivisionofthesupremecourtinthecriminalprocedurelegislationofukraineandeuropeancountries
AT volodymyrfihurskyi referringacasetothehighestdivisionofthesupremecourtinthecriminalprocedurelegislationofukraineandeuropeancountries
_version_ 1724226535571849216