Design, Use, and Effects of Sex Dolls and Sex Robots: Scoping Review

BackgroundAlthough sex toys representing human body parts are widely accepted and normalized, human-like full-body sex dolls and sex robots have elicited highly controversial debates. ObjectiveThis systematic scoping review of the academic literature on sex dolls...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Döring, Nicola, Mohseni, M Rohangis, Walter, Roberto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2020-07-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:https://www.jmir.org/2020/7/e18551
id doaj-13c50ea05fb64d0db97b7a119d2ca04e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-13c50ea05fb64d0db97b7a119d2ca04e2021-04-02T21:36:10ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712020-07-01227e1855110.2196/18551Design, Use, and Effects of Sex Dolls and Sex Robots: Scoping ReviewDöring, NicolaMohseni, M RohangisWalter, Roberto BackgroundAlthough sex toys representing human body parts are widely accepted and normalized, human-like full-body sex dolls and sex robots have elicited highly controversial debates. ObjectiveThis systematic scoping review of the academic literature on sex dolls and sex robots, the first of its kind, aimed to examine the extent and type of existing academic knowledge and to identify research gaps against this backdrop. MethodsA comprehensive multidisciplinary, multidatabase search strategy was used. All steps of literature search and selection, data charting, and synthesis followed the leading methodological guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. A total of 29 (17 peer reviewed) and 98 publications (32 peer reviewed) for sex dolls and sex robots, respectively, from 1993 to 2019 were included. ResultsAccording to the topics and methodologies, the sex doll and sex robot publications were divided into 5 and 6 groups, respectively. The majority of publications were theoretical papers. Thus far, no observational or experimental research exists that uses actual sex dolls or sex robots as stimulus material. ConclusionsThere is a need to improve the theoretical elaboration and the scope and depth of empirical research examining the sexual uses of human-like full-body material artifacts, particularly concerning not only risks but also opportunities for sexual and social well-being.https://www.jmir.org/2020/7/e18551
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Döring, Nicola
Mohseni, M Rohangis
Walter, Roberto
spellingShingle Döring, Nicola
Mohseni, M Rohangis
Walter, Roberto
Design, Use, and Effects of Sex Dolls and Sex Robots: Scoping Review
Journal of Medical Internet Research
author_facet Döring, Nicola
Mohseni, M Rohangis
Walter, Roberto
author_sort Döring, Nicola
title Design, Use, and Effects of Sex Dolls and Sex Robots: Scoping Review
title_short Design, Use, and Effects of Sex Dolls and Sex Robots: Scoping Review
title_full Design, Use, and Effects of Sex Dolls and Sex Robots: Scoping Review
title_fullStr Design, Use, and Effects of Sex Dolls and Sex Robots: Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Design, Use, and Effects of Sex Dolls and Sex Robots: Scoping Review
title_sort design, use, and effects of sex dolls and sex robots: scoping review
publisher JMIR Publications
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
issn 1438-8871
publishDate 2020-07-01
description BackgroundAlthough sex toys representing human body parts are widely accepted and normalized, human-like full-body sex dolls and sex robots have elicited highly controversial debates. ObjectiveThis systematic scoping review of the academic literature on sex dolls and sex robots, the first of its kind, aimed to examine the extent and type of existing academic knowledge and to identify research gaps against this backdrop. MethodsA comprehensive multidisciplinary, multidatabase search strategy was used. All steps of literature search and selection, data charting, and synthesis followed the leading methodological guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. A total of 29 (17 peer reviewed) and 98 publications (32 peer reviewed) for sex dolls and sex robots, respectively, from 1993 to 2019 were included. ResultsAccording to the topics and methodologies, the sex doll and sex robot publications were divided into 5 and 6 groups, respectively. The majority of publications were theoretical papers. Thus far, no observational or experimental research exists that uses actual sex dolls or sex robots as stimulus material. ConclusionsThere is a need to improve the theoretical elaboration and the scope and depth of empirical research examining the sexual uses of human-like full-body material artifacts, particularly concerning not only risks but also opportunities for sexual and social well-being.
url https://www.jmir.org/2020/7/e18551
work_keys_str_mv AT doringnicola designuseandeffectsofsexdollsandsexrobotsscopingreview
AT mohsenimrohangis designuseandeffectsofsexdollsandsexrobotsscopingreview
AT walterroberto designuseandeffectsofsexdollsandsexrobotsscopingreview
_version_ 1721544916623949824