Compransion Of The Clinical Outcomes Of Primary Closure And Patch Plasty Thecniques In Carotid Endarterectomy

Background: In this study, patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with primary closure or patch angioplasty for carotid artery disease were evaluated retrospectively and our early results were presented. Methods: In our clinic, fifty-five patients who performed carotid endarterectomy for carotid...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aydın Tuncay, Tamer Eroğlu, Rifat Ozmen, Deniz Elcik, Muhammet Bozgüney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rabia Yılmaz 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Contemporary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jcm/issue/54170/675512
id doaj-13c3199cfbed42f6bf79e80a0c9d7d4e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-13c3199cfbed42f6bf79e80a0c9d7d4e2021-08-29T10:32:44ZengRabia YılmazJournal of Contemporary Medicine2667-71802020-06-0110218118510.16899/jcm.6755121809Compransion Of The Clinical Outcomes Of Primary Closure And Patch Plasty Thecniques In Carotid EndarterectomyAydın Tuncay0Tamer Eroğlu1Rifat Ozmen2Deniz Elcik3Muhammet Bozgüney4ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİNIGDE OMER HALISDEMIR UNIVERSITYERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİFACULTY OF MEDICINEADANA ŞEHİR HASTANESİBackground: In this study, patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with primary closure or patch angioplasty for carotid artery disease were evaluated retrospectively and our early results were presented. Methods: In our clinic, fifty-five patients who performed carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery disease between November 2013 and May 2017 were enrolled in the study. The files of patients were reviewed retrospectively. These patients were divided into two groups as Group 1 (primer closure group, n =32) and Group 2 (patch angioplasty group, n = 23). Both groups were compared in terms of demographic data, surgical technique, complications and early results. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in terms of intensive care unit stay and hospitalization, postoperative neck hematoma/exploration, postoperative renal failure and the other demographic data, symptomatology, surgical technique, ≥30-day stroke, ≥30-day restenosis, ≥30-day death between both groups. Conclusion: Our study results have shown that the closure of arteriotomy with primary or patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy is a safe method in terms of early results.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jcm/issue/54170/675512angioplastycarotid endarterectomycarotid artery stenosismotality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aydın Tuncay
Tamer Eroğlu
Rifat Ozmen
Deniz Elcik
Muhammet Bozgüney
spellingShingle Aydın Tuncay
Tamer Eroğlu
Rifat Ozmen
Deniz Elcik
Muhammet Bozgüney
Compransion Of The Clinical Outcomes Of Primary Closure And Patch Plasty Thecniques In Carotid Endarterectomy
Journal of Contemporary Medicine
angioplasty
carotid endarterectomy
carotid artery stenosis
motality
author_facet Aydın Tuncay
Tamer Eroğlu
Rifat Ozmen
Deniz Elcik
Muhammet Bozgüney
author_sort Aydın Tuncay
title Compransion Of The Clinical Outcomes Of Primary Closure And Patch Plasty Thecniques In Carotid Endarterectomy
title_short Compransion Of The Clinical Outcomes Of Primary Closure And Patch Plasty Thecniques In Carotid Endarterectomy
title_full Compransion Of The Clinical Outcomes Of Primary Closure And Patch Plasty Thecniques In Carotid Endarterectomy
title_fullStr Compransion Of The Clinical Outcomes Of Primary Closure And Patch Plasty Thecniques In Carotid Endarterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Compransion Of The Clinical Outcomes Of Primary Closure And Patch Plasty Thecniques In Carotid Endarterectomy
title_sort compransion of the clinical outcomes of primary closure and patch plasty thecniques in carotid endarterectomy
publisher Rabia Yılmaz
series Journal of Contemporary Medicine
issn 2667-7180
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Background: In this study, patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with primary closure or patch angioplasty for carotid artery disease were evaluated retrospectively and our early results were presented. Methods: In our clinic, fifty-five patients who performed carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery disease between November 2013 and May 2017 were enrolled in the study. The files of patients were reviewed retrospectively. These patients were divided into two groups as Group 1 (primer closure group, n =32) and Group 2 (patch angioplasty group, n = 23). Both groups were compared in terms of demographic data, surgical technique, complications and early results. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in terms of intensive care unit stay and hospitalization, postoperative neck hematoma/exploration, postoperative renal failure and the other demographic data, symptomatology, surgical technique, ≥30-day stroke, ≥30-day restenosis, ≥30-day death between both groups. Conclusion: Our study results have shown that the closure of arteriotomy with primary or patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy is a safe method in terms of early results.
topic angioplasty
carotid endarterectomy
carotid artery stenosis
motality
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jcm/issue/54170/675512
work_keys_str_mv AT aydıntuncay compransionoftheclinicaloutcomesofprimaryclosureandpatchplastythecniquesincarotidendarterectomy
AT tamereroglu compransionoftheclinicaloutcomesofprimaryclosureandpatchplastythecniquesincarotidendarterectomy
AT rifatozmen compransionoftheclinicaloutcomesofprimaryclosureandpatchplastythecniquesincarotidendarterectomy
AT denizelcik compransionoftheclinicaloutcomesofprimaryclosureandpatchplastythecniquesincarotidendarterectomy
AT muhammetbozguney compransionoftheclinicaloutcomesofprimaryclosureandpatchplastythecniquesincarotidendarterectomy
_version_ 1721187230583619584