A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ROMANIA AND MOLDOVA FROM AN INSTITUTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE

This paper takes an institutional perspective and puts forward the idea that ensuring sustainability, in all its three dimensions – economic, social and ecological, mainly depends on the rules of the game that guide human behavior. In other words, it is the right mix of formal (such as, well-defined...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreea-Oana IACOBUȚĂ, Rodica PERCIUN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Technopress 2017-06-01
Series:Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jopafl.com/uploads/issue11/A_COMPARATIVE_ANALYSIS_OF_SUSTAINABLE_DEVELOPMENT_IN_ROMANIA_AND_MOLDOVA_FROM_AN_INSTITUTIONALIST_PERSPECTIVE.pdf
id doaj-13af505dfd5347069325caef7dd00e6f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-13af505dfd5347069325caef7dd00e6f2020-11-25T00:16:17ZengTechnopressJournal of Public Administration, Finance and Law2285-22042285-34992017-06-0161193102A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ROMANIA AND MOLDOVA FROM AN INSTITUTIONALIST PERSPECTIVEAndreea-Oana IACOBUȚĂ0Rodica PERCIUN1Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationNational Institute for Economic Research of ASM, MoldovaThis paper takes an institutional perspective and puts forward the idea that ensuring sustainability, in all its three dimensions – economic, social and ecological, mainly depends on the rules of the game that guide human behavior. In other words, it is the right mix of formal (such as, well-defined and enforced property rights) and informal (for example, norms of reciprocity of trust, involvement, tolerance etc.) institutions that provides proper incentives for the individuals to take responsibility rather than make compromises for fear of being sanctioned. Using indicators on sustainable development and the quality of institutional framework, the paper provides a comparative analysis of Romanian and Moldova regarding these issues and discusses the potential of Romania and Moldova to reach sustainability.http://www.jopafl.com/uploads/issue11/A_COMPARATIVE_ANALYSIS_OF_SUSTAINABLE_DEVELOPMENT_IN_ROMANIA_AND_MOLDOVA_FROM_AN_INSTITUTIONALIST_PERSPECTIVE.pdfsustainable developmentformal and informal institutionsromaniamoldovaprogresschallenges
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreea-Oana IACOBUȚĂ
Rodica PERCIUN
spellingShingle Andreea-Oana IACOBUȚĂ
Rodica PERCIUN
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ROMANIA AND MOLDOVA FROM AN INSTITUTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE
Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law
sustainable development
formal and informal institutions
romania
moldova
progress
challenges
author_facet Andreea-Oana IACOBUȚĂ
Rodica PERCIUN
author_sort Andreea-Oana IACOBUȚĂ
title A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ROMANIA AND MOLDOVA FROM AN INSTITUTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE
title_short A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ROMANIA AND MOLDOVA FROM AN INSTITUTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE
title_full A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ROMANIA AND MOLDOVA FROM AN INSTITUTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE
title_fullStr A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ROMANIA AND MOLDOVA FROM AN INSTITUTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE
title_full_unstemmed A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ROMANIA AND MOLDOVA FROM AN INSTITUTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE
title_sort comparative analysis of sustainable development in romania and moldova from an institutionalist perspective
publisher Technopress
series Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law
issn 2285-2204
2285-3499
publishDate 2017-06-01
description This paper takes an institutional perspective and puts forward the idea that ensuring sustainability, in all its three dimensions – economic, social and ecological, mainly depends on the rules of the game that guide human behavior. In other words, it is the right mix of formal (such as, well-defined and enforced property rights) and informal (for example, norms of reciprocity of trust, involvement, tolerance etc.) institutions that provides proper incentives for the individuals to take responsibility rather than make compromises for fear of being sanctioned. Using indicators on sustainable development and the quality of institutional framework, the paper provides a comparative analysis of Romanian and Moldova regarding these issues and discusses the potential of Romania and Moldova to reach sustainability.
topic sustainable development
formal and informal institutions
romania
moldova
progress
challenges
url http://www.jopafl.com/uploads/issue11/A_COMPARATIVE_ANALYSIS_OF_SUSTAINABLE_DEVELOPMENT_IN_ROMANIA_AND_MOLDOVA_FROM_AN_INSTITUTIONALIST_PERSPECTIVE.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT andreeaoanaiacobuta acomparativeanalysisofsustainabledevelopmentinromaniaandmoldovafromaninstitutionalistperspective
AT rodicaperciun acomparativeanalysisofsustainabledevelopmentinromaniaandmoldovafromaninstitutionalistperspective
AT andreeaoanaiacobuta comparativeanalysisofsustainabledevelopmentinromaniaandmoldovafromaninstitutionalistperspective
AT rodicaperciun comparativeanalysisofsustainabledevelopmentinromaniaandmoldovafromaninstitutionalistperspective
_version_ 1725383485715120128